Skip to main content

Characterizing Bioinks for Extrusion Bioprinting: Printability and Rheology

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
3D Bioprinting

Abstract

In recent years, new technologies based on 3D bioprinting have emerged as ideal tools with which to arrange cells and biomaterials in three dimensions and so achieve tissue engineering’s original goals. The simplest and most widely used form of bioprinting is based on pneumatic extrusion, where 3D structures are built up by drawing patterns of cell-laden or non–cell-laden material through a robotically manipulated syringe. Developing and characterizing new biomaterials for 3D bioprinting (i.e., bioinks) is critical for the progress of the field. This chapter describes a series of protocols for developing, optimizing, and testing new bioinks for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 03 November 2022

    In chapter 7, on page 111, an author’s name was misspelt as “Yifan Li”. It has been updated as “Yifan Zhang”.

References

  1. Vacanti JP, Langer R (1999) Tissue engineering: the design and fabrication of living replacement devices for surgical reconstruction and transplantation. Lancet 354:S32–S34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kang H-W, Lee SJ, Ko IK et al (2016) A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol 34:312–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D et al (2017) The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol Adv 35:217–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS (2009) Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 103(4):655–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Therriault D, White SR, J a L (2003) Chaotic mixing in three-dimensional microvascular networks fabricated by direct-write assembly. Nat Mater 2:265–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS et al (2014) 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv Mater 26:3124–3130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang Y (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310:1139–1143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Engler AJ, M a G, Sen S et al (2004) Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J Cell Biol 166:877–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Saha K, Keung AJ, Irwin EF et al (2008) Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophys J 95:4426–4438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert F, O’Connell CD, Mladenovska T et al (2017) Print me an organ? Ethical and regulatory issues emerging from 3D bioprinting in medicine. Sci Eng Ethics 24(1):73–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schuurman W, Levett PA, Pot MW et al (2013) Gelatin-methacrylamide hydrogels as potential biomaterials for fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. Macromol Biosci 13:551–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T et al (2017) Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability. Biofabrication 9(4):044107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connell CD, Di Bella C, Thompson F et al (2016) Development of the Biopen: a handheld device for surgical printing of adipose stem cells at a chondral wound site. Biofabrication 8:15019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. He Y, Yang F, Zhao H et al (2016) Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting. Sci Rep 6:29977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Duchi S, Onofrillo C, O’Connell CD et al (2017) Handheld co-axial bioprinting: application to in situ surgical cartilage repair. Sci Rep 7:5837

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Di Bella C, Duchi S, O’Connell CD et al (2017) In situ handheld three-dimensional bioprinting for cartilage regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12(3):611–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cathal O’Connell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

O’Connell, C. et al. (2020). Characterizing Bioinks for Extrusion Bioprinting: Printability and Rheology. In: Crook, J.M. (eds) 3D Bioprinting. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2140. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0520-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0520-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0519-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0520-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics