Skip to main content

Risk Modeling and Analysis for Sustainable Asset Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Asset Management and Infrastructure Sustainability

Abstract

Sustainability has become a key driver in defining how companies are expected to operate. To adapt to this new industrial setting, companies are now broadening their focus from emphasis on economical gains to include environmental and societal issues. Within the field of asset management, the application of sustainable practices, in a way, can imply adopting a total lifecycle approach; i.e. managing the activities of assets in pre-manufacturing, manufacturing, use and post-use stages. To ensure a competitive approach, this requires risk modeling and analysis to support decision making processes to maximize return and to avoid negative environmental and societal impacts. Though some considerable work has been done in the field of risk modeling involving developments within information management, much work is still needed to develop models that can provide effective comprehensive overview for decision makers. Such information is especially important when dealing with hidden risks. This requires risk management tools that capture, the factors that affect asset performance, the interdependence of these factors, their likelihood, and their possible impacts. This paper briefly presents a framework for sustainable asset management. This framework is guided by sustainability principles to improve the triple bottom line (economy, society and environment) perspective following a total lifecycle approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liyanage JP (2003) Operations and maintenance performance in oil and gas production assets: theoretical architecture and capital value theory in perspective. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway. ISBN 82-471-5604-0/ISSN 0809-103X

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liyanage JP (2006) Strategies for sustainability risk management through active bap (business-asset- process) performance integration. The 1st World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM), Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Woodhouse J (2001) Asset management: asset management processes and tools. The Woodhouse Partnership Ltd, UK

    Google Scholar 

  4. Woodhouse J (2010) What is asset management in 2010? The Institute of Asset Management. [Online] 2009. http://www.theiam.org. Accessed 26 May 2010

  5. Komonen K, Kortelainen H, Raikkonen M (2006) An asset management framework to improve longer term returns on investments in the capital intensive industries. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Engineering Asset Management, Gold Coast, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  6. Badurdeen F, Metta H, Bedida K, Marksberry P. Moving forward: from maintenance to sustainable asset management. J Qual. Maintenance Eng. (currently under review)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lutchman R (2006) Suatainable asset management. DEStech Publications, Inc, Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haimes YY (2004) Risk modeling, assessment, and management. A.J Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Manag Rev 36(2):90–100

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liyanage JP, Badurdeen F (2010) Strategies for integrating maintenance for sustainable manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 4th world congress on engineering asset management, Athens, Greece, pp 308–315

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joshi K, Venkatachalam A, Jawahir IS (2006) A new methodology for transforming 3R concept into 6R concept for improved product sustainability. Global conference on sustainable product development and life cycle engineering, Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO 31000 (2009) Risk management–principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haimes YY (1991) Total risk management. Risk Anal 11(2):169–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1(1):11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Achenbach J, Fahrenthold DA (2010) Oil spill dumped 4.9 million barrels into Gulf of Mexico, latest measure shows. The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/02/AR2010080204695.html. Accessed 19 Aug 2010

  16. Cohen MA (2010) A Taxonomy of oil spill costs. Backgrounder Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. Deepwater horizon joint investigation. http://www.deepwaterinvestigation.com/go/page/3043/47459/. Accessed 02 Aug 2010

  18. The Role of BP in the Deepwater Horizon Explosion and Oil Spill (2010) Hearing before the subcommittee on oversight and investigations of the house energy and commerce committee. 111th Congress

    Google Scholar 

  19. Waxman HA, Stupak B (2010) Letter to Tony Hayward, CEO, BP. US House of Representatives, Committee on Energy and Commerce. http://energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100608/Hayward.BP.2010.6.8.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2010

  20. Lee J (2010) A new process and a new escrow account for Gulf Oil spill claims from BP. The White House. http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/17/a-new-process-and-a-new-escrow-account-gulf-oil-spill-claims-bp. Accessed 05 Aug 2010

  21. Liyanage JP (2006) Sustainability risk management: managing business risk in complex environments through systematic operations and maintenance performance specifications. 18th European maintenance congress: Euromaintenance 2006, Basel, Switzerland, pp 677–682

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bowden AR, Lane MR, Martin JH (2001) Triple bottom line risk management: enhancing profit, environmental performance, and community benefits. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Badurdeen F, Wijekoon K, Shuaib M, Goldsby TJ, Iyengar D, Jawahir IS (2010) Integrated modeling to enhance resilience in sustainable supply chains: a review. Accepted for presentation at IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (IEEE CASE) 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Badurdeen, F., Shuaib, M., Liyanage, J.P. (2012). Risk Modeling and Analysis for Sustainable Asset Management. In: Mathew, J., Ma, L., Tan, A., Weijnen, M., Lee, J. (eds) Engineering Asset Management and Infrastructure Sustainability. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-493-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-493-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-301-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-493-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics