Skip to main content

PET-CT of Melanoma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical PET-CT in Radiology
  • 2089 Accesses

Abstract

Due to the very high avidity of melanoma for FDG, FDG PET is a sensitive imaging technique in the detection of metastatic melanoma (M-staging) and is superior to CT for small lesions in locations other than the brain and lungs, particularly small metastases to lymph nodes, soft tissue, and small bowel. FDG PET appears most useful for patients at high risk for harboring distant spread who are under consideration for further surgical therapy. This generally applies to patients with more advanced disease (stage III and IV with isolated distant metastases). These patients may benefit from the identification of unsuspected or additional distant metastases with subsequent change in management by means of additional surgical resection or avoidance of unnecessary procedures. The most common indications for PET-CT in the initial staging of melanoma, then, would include patients with locoregional disease at high risk for distant metastases, including patients with in-transit and regional lymph node metastases based on clinical findings, biopsy, or sentinel node biopsy (stage III). PET-CT with its inherent whole body capability is arguably the best imaging option to search for metastases from melanoma, with the potential to change treatment plansas high as 48%. The routine use of FDG PET and hence PET-CT is not well defined in asymptomatic patients with clinically early staged melanoma (stage I and II). FDG PET is not indicated for thinner primary melanoma (<1.5 mm depth) because of low probability of disseminated disease at diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Seigel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:106–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang AE, Karnell LH, Menck HR. The national cancer data base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma: a summary of 84,836 cases from the past decade. Cancer 1998;83:1664–1678.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lens MB, Dawes M. Global perspectives of contemporary epidemiological trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2004;150:179–185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Christianson DF, Anderson CM. Close monitoring and lifetime follow-up is optimal for patients with a history of melanoma. Semin Oncol 2003;30:369–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirkwood JM, Ibrahim JG, Sosman JA, et al. High dose interferon alfa-2b significantly prolongs relapse-free and overall survival compared with the GM2-KLH/QS-21 vaccine in patients with resected stage IIB-III melanoma: results of intergroup trial E1694/S9512/C509801. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2370–2380.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lange JR, Sharfman WH, Alani RM, et al. Melanoma. In: Abeloff MD, Armitage JO, Niederhuber JE, et al.(eds.). Abeloff: Clinical Oncology, 3rd edn. New York: Elsevier-Churchill Livingstone, 2004, pp. 1561–1588.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ballo MT, Ang KK. Radiation therapy for malignant melanoma. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:323–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of the American Joint Society on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3635–3648.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malignant melanoma of skin. In: Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (eds.). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 6th edn. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2002, pp. 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wrightson WR, Wong SL, Edwards MJ, et al. Complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:676–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morton DL, Hoon DSB, Cochran AJ, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma. Ann Surg 2003;238:538–550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Will O, Purkayastha S, Chan S, et al. Diagnostic precision of nanoparticle-enhanced MRI for lymph-node metastases: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:52–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wahl RL, Hutchins GD, Buchsbaum DJ, et al. 18F-2-deoxy-2 fluoro-D-glucose uptake into human xenografts. Cancer 1991;67:1544–1550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner JD, Schauwecker D, Davidson D, et al. FDG PET sensitivity for melanoma lymph node metastases is dependent on tumor volume. J Surg Oncol 2001;77:237–242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schöder H, Larson SM, Yeung WD. PET/CT in oncology: integration into clinical management of lymphoma, melanoma and gastrointestinal malignancies. J Nucl Med 2004;45:72S–81S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reinhardt MJ, Joe AY, Jaeger U, et al. Diagnostic performance of whole body dual modality 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for N- and M-staging of malignant melanoma: experience with 250 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1178–1187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel JK, Didolkar MS, Pickren JW, et al. Metastatic pattern of malignant melanoma: a study of 216 autopsy cases. Am J Surg 1978;135:807–810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawashima A, Fishman EK, Kuhnlman JE, et al. CT of malignant melanoma: pattern of small bowel and mesenteric involvement.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:570–574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kath R, Hayungs J, Bornfeld N, et al. Prognosis and treatment of disseminated uveal melanoma. Cancer 1993;72:2219–2223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner JD, Schauwecker D, Davidson D, et al. Prospective study of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography of lymph node basins in melanoma patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1508–1515.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Crippa F, Leutner M, Belli F, et al. Which kind of lymph node metastases can FDG PET detect? A clinical study in melanoma.J Nucl Med 2000;41:1491–1494.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Friedman KP, Wahl RL. Clinical use of positron emission tomography in the management of cutaneous melanoma. Semin Nucl Med 2004;34:242–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Segall GM, Swetter SM. PET imaging in melanoma. In: Valk PE, Bailey DL, Townsend DW, Maisey MN (eds.). Positron Emission Tomography. Basic Science and Clinical Practice. London: Springer-Verlag, 2003:625–636

    Google Scholar 

  24. Swetter SM, Carroll LA, Johnson DL, et al. Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography for metastatic detection in melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:646–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tyler DS, Onaitis M, Kherani A, et al. Positron emission tomography scanning in malignant melanoma, Clinical utility in paitenst with stage III disease. Cancer 2000;89:1019–1025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reske SN, Kotzerke J. FDG PET for clinical use: results of the 3rd German interdisciplinary consensus conference, “Onko-PET III,” 21 July and 19 September 2000. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:1707–1723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rinne D, Baum RP, Hör G, et al. Primary staging and follow-up of high risk melanoma patients with whole body 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, results of a prospective study of 100 patients. Cancer 1998;82:1664–1671.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dummer R, Panizzon R, Bloch PH, et al. Updated Swiss guidelines for the treatment and follow-up of cutaneous melanoma. Dermatology 2005;210:39–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wagner JD, Schauwecker D, Davidson D, et al. Inefficacy of F-18 fluorodeoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography scans for initial evaluation in early-stage cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 2005;104:570–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Acland KM, O’Doherty MJ, Russell-Jones R. The value of positron emission tomography scanning in the detection of subclinical metastatic melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:606–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Calabro A, Singletary SE, Balch CM. Pattern of relapse in 1001 consecutive patients with melanoma nodal metastases. Arch Surg 1989;124:1051–1055.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stas M, Stroobants S, Dupont P, et al. 18-FDG PET scan in the staging of recurrent melanoma: additional value and therapeutic impact. Melanoma Res 2002;12:479–490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Beyer T, et al. To enhance or not to enhance? 18F-FDG and CT contrast agents in dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2004;45:56S–65S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vogel WV, Oyen WJG, Barentsz JO, et al. PET/CT: panacea, redundancy, or something in between. J Nucl Med 2004;45:15S–24S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mercier GA, Alavi A, Fraker DL. FDG positron emission tomography in isolated limb perfusion therapy in patients with locally advanced melanoma: preliminary results. Clin Nucl Med 2001;26:832–836.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  1. Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, et al. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4357–4368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Essner R. Surgical treatment of malignant melanoma. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:109–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mack LA, McKinnon JG. Controversies in the management of metastatic melanoma to regional lymphatic basins. J Surg Oncol 2004;86:189–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reinartz P, Wieres FJ, Schneider W, et al. Side-by-side of PET and CT scans in oncology: which patients might profit from integrated PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:1456–1461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsao H, Atkins MB, Sober AJ. Management of cutaneous melanoma. N Engl J Med 2004;351:998–1012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Shreve .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bui, C., Shreve, P. (2011). PET-CT of Melanoma. In: Shreve, P., Townsend, D. (eds) Clinical PET-CT in Radiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48902-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48902-5_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-48900-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-48902-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics