Skip to main content

Principles of Medical Imaging in the Diagnosis and Staging of the Cancer Patient

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical PET-CT in Radiology
  • 2516 Accesses

Abstract

Staging is a critical issue in the evaluation, prognosis, and treatment planning for patients with cancer. Newer imaging techniques play an important role in determining the extent of cancer and the optimal treatment regimen. The recent introduction of PET and PET/CT has been shown to increase the stage of many patients, leading to changes in the treatment plan. Stage migration will lead to improved treatment results, which must be kept in mind when viewing historical data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Doll R. The Pierre Denoix Memorial Lecture: nature and nurture in the control of cancer. Eur J Cancer 1999;35(1):16–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer AJCC. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edn. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gospodarowicz MK, Miller D, Groome PA, Greene FL, Logan PA, Sobin LH. The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification. Cancer 2004;100(1):1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fong Y, Kemeney N, Lawrence T. Cancer of the liver and biliary tree. In: DeVita Jr VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds.). Cancer Principles & Practice of Oncology, 6th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001:1182

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kluge R, Schmidt F, Caca K, et al. Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose for diagnosis and staging of bile duct cancer. Hepatology 2001;33(5):1029–1035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim YJ, Yun M, Lee WJ, Kim KS, Lee JD. Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30(11):1467–1472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 1985;312(25):1604–1608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodward WA, Strom EA, Tucker SL, et al. Changes in the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for breast cancer dramatically affect stage-specific survival. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(17):3244–3248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandez FG, Drebin JA, Linehan DC, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, Strasberg SM. Five-year survival after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer in patients screened by positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). Ann Surg 2004;240(3):438–447; discussion 447–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Westreenen HL, Westerterp M, Bossuyt PM, et al. Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ­positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22(18):3805–3812.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi JY, Jang HJ, Shim YM, et al. 18F-FDG PET in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative surgery: prognostic implications. J Nucl Med 2004;45(11):1843–1850.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eloubeidi MA, Desmond R, Arguedas MR, Reed CE, Wilcox CM. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal ­carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status. Cancer 2002;95(7):1434–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, et al. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol 2004;22(21):4357–4368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao CL, Dean RC, Pinto A, et al. Detection of circulating prostate specific antigen expressing prostatic cells in the bone marrow of radical prostatectomy patients by sensitive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. J Urol. Apr 1999; 161(4); 1070–1076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony F. Shields .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shields, A.F. (2011). Principles of Medical Imaging in the Diagnosis and Staging of the Cancer Patient. In: Shreve, P., Townsend, D. (eds) Clinical PET-CT in Radiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48902-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48902-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-48900-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-48902-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics