Abstract
Interpersonal distance and gaze provide a wealth of information during face-to-face social interactions. These “proxemic” behaviors offer a window into everyday social cognition by revealing interactants’ affective states (e.g., interpersonal attitudes) and cognitive responses (e.g., social attention). Here we provide a brief overview of the social psychological literature in this domain. We focus on new techniques for experimentally manipulating and measuring proxemics, including the use of immersive virtual environments and digital motion capture. We also discuss ways in which these approaches can be integrated with psychophysiological and neuroimaging techniques. Throughout, we argue that contemporary proxemics research provides psychology and neuroscience with a means to study social cognition and behavior as they naturally emerge and unfold in vivo.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bailenson JN, Blascovich J, Beall AC, Loomis JM (2003) Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Perso Soc Psychol Bull 29:819–834
Bailenson JN, Beall AC, Loomis J, Blascovich J, Turk M (2004) Transformed social interaction: decoupling representation from behavior and form in collaborative virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 13(4):428–441
Bessenoff GR, Sherman JW (2000) Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: evaluation versus stereotype activation. Soc Cognition 18(4):329–353
Blascovich J, Mendes WB, Hunter SB, Lickel B, Kowai-Bell N (2001) Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(2):253
Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall AC, Swinth KR, Hoyt CL, Bailenson JN (2002) Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychol Inq 13(2):103–124
Bluemke M, Friese M (2008) Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects. Eur J Soc Psychol 38(6):977–997
Carver CS, Harmon-Jones E (2009) Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications. Psychol Bull 135(2):183
Chapman HA, Kim DA, Susskind JM, Anderson AK (2009) In bad taste: evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science 323(5918):1222–1226
Chen M, Bargh JA (1999) Consequences of automatic evaluation: immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25(2):215–224
De Jaegher H, Di Paolo E, Gallagher S (2010) Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends Cogn Sci 14(10):441–447
Debener S, Minow F, Emkes R, Gandras K, Vos M (2012) How about taking a low-cost, small, and wireless EEG for a walk? Psychophysiology 49(11):1617–1621
Dotsch R, Wigboldus DH (2008) Virtual prejudice. J Exp Soc Psychol 44(4):1194–1198
Dovidio JF, Kawakami K, Johnson C, Johnson B, Howard A (1997) On the nature of prejudice: automatic and controlled processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 33(5):510–540
Elliot AJ (2006) The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motiv Emot 30(2):111–116
Elliot AJ (2008) Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation. Taylor & Francis, New York
Farroni T, Csibra G, Simion F, Johnson MH (2002) Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(14):9602–9605
Fehr E, Gachter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415(6868):137–140
Ferrari M, Quaresima V (2012) A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. Neuroimage 63(2):921–935
Frischen A, Bayliss AP, Tipper SP (2007) Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychol Bull 133(4):694
Froese T (2013) Interactively guided introspection is getting science closer to an effective consciousness meter. Conscious Cogn 22(2):672–676
Gevins A, Chan CS, Sam-Vargas L (2012) Towards measuring brain function on groups of people in the real world. PLoS ONE 7(9):e44676
Gillath O, McCall C, Shaver PR, Blascovich J (2008) What can virtual reality teach us about prosocial tendencies in real and virtual environments? Media Psychol 11(2):259–282
Hall ET (1969) The hidden dimension, vol 1990. Anchor Books, New York
Hall ET (1973) The silent language. Anchor, New York
Harrigan JA (2005) Proxemics, kinesics, and gaze. The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research, pp 137–198
Hayduk LA (1978) Personal space: an evaluative and orienting overview. Psychol Bull 85(1):117
Hayduk LA (1983) Personal space: where we now stand. Psychol Bull 94(2):293
Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 243–259
Ickes W, Stinson L, Bissonnette V, Garcia S (1990) Naturalistic social cognition: empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. J Pers Soc Psychol 59(4):730
Irish JE (2013) Can I sit here? A review of the literature supporting the use of single-user virtual environments to help adolescents with autism learn appropriate social communication skills. Comput Human Behav 29(5):A17–A24
Kane HS, McCall C, Collins NL, Blascovich J (2012) Mere presence is not enough: responsive support in a virtual world. J Exp Soc Psychol 48(1):37–44
Kennedy DP, Gläscher J, Tyszka JM, Adolphs R (2009) Personal space regulation by the human amygdala. Nat Neurosci 12(10):1226–1227
Kingstone A, Smilek D, Eastwood JD (2008) Cognitive ethology: a new approach for studying human cognition. Br J Psychol 99(3):317–340
Kuethe JL (1962) Social schemas. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 64(1):31
Levenson R, Ruef A (1992) Empathy: a physiological substrate. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:234–246
Loomis JM, Kelly JW, Pusch M, Bailenson JN, Beall AC (2008) Psychophysics of perceiving eye-gaze and head direction with peripheral vision: Implications for the dynamics of eye-gaze behavior. Perception 37:1443–1457
Marsh AA, Ambady N, Kleck RE (2005) The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach-and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion 5(1):119
McCall C, Blascovich J (2009) How, when, and why to use digital experimental virtual environments to study social behavior. Soc Influence 4:138–154
McCall C, Singer T (2015) Facing off with unfair others: introducing proxemic imaging as an implicit measure of approach and avoidance during social interaction. PLoS ONE
McCall C, Blascovich J, Young A, Persky S (2009) Proxemic behaviors as predictors of aggression towards Black (but not White) males in an immersive virtual environment. Soc Influence 4(2):138–154
McCall C, Tipper CM, Blascovich J, Grafton ST (2012) Attitudes trigger motor behavior through conditioned associations: neural and behavioral evidence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 7(7):841–849
Pedersen DM, Shears LM (1973) A review of personal space research in the framework of general system theory. Psychol Bull 80(5):367
Perry A, Levy-Gigi E, Richter-Levin G, Shamay-Tsoory SG (2015) Interpersonal distance and social anxiety in autistic spectrum disorders: a behavioral and ERP study. Soc Neurosci 10(4):354–365
Pillutla MM, Murnighan JK (1996) Unfairness, anger, and spite: emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 68(3):208–224
Piper SK, Krueger A, Koch SP, Mehnert J, Habermehl C, Steinbrink J, Schmitz CH (2014) A wearable multi-channel fNIRS system for brain imaging in freely moving subjects. Neuroimage 85:64–71
Price TF, Peterson CK, Harmon-Jones E (2012) The emotive neuroscience of embodiment. Motiv Emot 36(1):27–37
Schilbach L (2015) Eye to eye, face to face and brain to brain: novel approaches to study the behavioral dynamics and neural mechanisms of social interactions. Curr Opin Behav Sci 3:130–135
Schilbach L, Wilms M, Eickhoff SB, Romanzetti S, Tepest R, Bente G, Vogeley K (2010) Minds made for sharing: initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry. J Cogn Neurosci 22(12):2702–2715
Schilbach L, Timmermans B, Reddy V, Costall A, Bente G, Schlicht T, Vogeley K (2013) Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behav Brain Sci 36(04):393–414
Schwartz C, Bente G, Gawronski A, Schilbach L, Vogeley K (2010) Responses to nonverbal behaviour of dynamic virtual characters in high-functioning autism. J Autism Dev Disord 40(1):100–111
Senju A, Johnson MH (2009) The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development. Trends Cogn Sci 13(3):127–134
Singer T, Seymour B, O’Doherty JP, Stephan KE, Dolan RJ, Frith CD (2006) Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Nature 439(7075):466–469. doi:10.1038/nature04271
Solarz AK (1960) Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. J Exp Psychol 59(4):239
Spezio ML, Adolphs R, Hurley RS, Piven J (2007) Analysis of face gaze in autism using “Bubbles”. Neuropsychologia 45(1):144–151
Tomasello M (1995) Joint attention as social cognition. Joint attention: its origins and role in development, pp 103–130
Word CO, Zanna MP, Cooper J (1974) The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. J Exp Soc Psychol 10(2):109–120
Worthington ME (1974) Personal space as a function of the stigma effect. Environ Behav 6:289–294
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCall, C. (2015). Mapping Social Interactions: The Science of Proxemics. In: Wöhr, M., Krach, S. (eds) Social Behavior from Rodents to Humans. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2015_431
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2015_431
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47427-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47429-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)