Abstract
Resolution space measures the maximum number of clauses that need to be simultaneously active in a resolution refutation. This complexity measure was defined by Kleine Büning and Lettmann in [8] and slightly modified recently [6] to make it suitable for comparisons with other measures. Since its definition, only trivial lower bound for the resolution space, measured in terms of the number of initial clauses were known. In this paper we prove optimal lower bounds for the space needed in the resolution refutation of two important families of formulas. We show that Tseitin formulas associated to a certain kind of expander graphs of n nodes need resolution space n - c for some constant c. Measured on the number of clauses, this result is best possible since the mentioned formulas have O(n) clauses, and the number of clauses is an upper bound for the resolution space. We also show that the formulas expressing the general Pigeonhole Principle with n holes and more than n pigeons, need space n + 1 independently of the number of pigeons. Since a matching space upper bound of n + 1 for these formulas exist, the obtained bound is exact. These results point to a possible connection between resolution space and resolution width, another measure for the complexity of resolution refutations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alekhnovich, M., Ben-Sasson, E., Razborov A. and Wigderson, A.: Space complexity in Propositional Calculus. Preliminary draft, July 1999.
Beame, P. and Pitassi, T.: Simplified and Improved Resolution Lower Bounds. In Proc. 37th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, (1996) 274–282.
Ben-Sasson, E. and Widgerson, A.: Short proofs are narrow, resolution made simple. In Proc. 31st ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (1999) 517–527.
Buss, S. and Pitassi, T.: Resolution and theWeak Pigeonhole Principle. In Computer Science Logic 97, (1997), proceedings to appear in Springer Verlag.
Chvátal, V. and Szemerédi, E.: Many hard examples for resolution. Journal of the ACM, 35 (1988) 759–768.
Esteban, J.L. and Torán, J.: Space bounds for resolution. In Proc. 16th STACS, Springer Verlag LNCS 1563 (1999) 551–561.
Haken, A: The intractability of resolution Theoretical Computer Science 35 (1985) 297–308.
Kleine Büning, H. and Lettman, T.: Aussangenlogik: Deduktion und Algorithmen, B.G. Teubner Stuttgart (1994).
Margulis, A.: Explicit construction of concentrators. Problems Information Transmission 9 (1973) 71–80.
Messner, J.: Personal communication 1999.
Schöning, U.: Better expanders and superconcentrators by Kolmogorov complexity. In Proceedings 4th International Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity, Sirocco 97 Carleton Scientific (1997) 138–151.
Schöning, U.: Resolution proofs, exponential bounds and Kolmogorov complexity. In Proc. 22nd MFCS Conference, Springer Verlag LNCS 1295 (1997) 110–116.
Tseitin, G.S. On the complexity of derivation in propositional calculus. In Studies in Constructive Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, Part 2. Consultants Bureau (1968) 115–125.
Urquhart, A.: Hard examples for resolution. Journal of the ACM 34 (1987) 209–219.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Torán, J. (1999). Lower Bounds for Space in Resolution. In: Flum, J., Rodriguez-Artalejo, M. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1683. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48168-0_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48168-0_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66536-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48168-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive