Skip to main content

Lower Bounds for Space in Resolution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1683))

Abstract

Resolution space measures the maximum number of clauses that need to be simultaneously active in a resolution refutation. This complexity measure was defined by Kleine Büning and Lettmann in [8] and slightly modified recently [6] to make it suitable for comparisons with other measures. Since its definition, only trivial lower bound for the resolution space, measured in terms of the number of initial clauses were known. In this paper we prove optimal lower bounds for the space needed in the resolution refutation of two important families of formulas. We show that Tseitin formulas associated to a certain kind of expander graphs of n nodes need resolution space n - c for some constant c. Measured on the number of clauses, this result is best possible since the mentioned formulas have O(n) clauses, and the number of clauses is an upper bound for the resolution space. We also show that the formulas expressing the general Pigeonhole Principle with n holes and more than n pigeons, need space n + 1 independently of the number of pigeons. Since a matching space upper bound of n + 1 for these formulas exist, the obtained bound is exact. These results point to a possible connection between resolution space and resolution width, another measure for the complexity of resolution refutations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alekhnovich, M., Ben-Sasson, E., Razborov A. and Wigderson, A.: Space complexity in Propositional Calculus. Preliminary draft, July 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beame, P. and Pitassi, T.: Simplified and Improved Resolution Lower Bounds. In Proc. 37th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, (1996) 274–282.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Sasson, E. and Widgerson, A.: Short proofs are narrow, resolution made simple. In Proc. 31st ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (1999) 517–527.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buss, S. and Pitassi, T.: Resolution and theWeak Pigeonhole Principle. In Computer Science Logic 97, (1997), proceedings to appear in Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chvátal, V. and Szemerédi, E.: Many hard examples for resolution. Journal of the ACM, 35 (1988) 759–768.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Esteban, J.L. and Torán, J.: Space bounds for resolution. In Proc. 16th STACS, Springer Verlag LNCS 1563 (1999) 551–561.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haken, A: The intractability of resolution Theoretical Computer Science 35 (1985) 297–308.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleine Büning, H. and Lettman, T.: Aussangenlogik: Deduktion und Algorithmen, B.G. Teubner Stuttgart (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Margulis, A.: Explicit construction of concentrators. Problems Information Transmission 9 (1973) 71–80.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Messner, J.: Personal communication 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schöning, U.: Better expanders and superconcentrators by Kolmogorov complexity. In Proceedings 4th International Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity, Sirocco 97 Carleton Scientific (1997) 138–151.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schöning, U.: Resolution proofs, exponential bounds and Kolmogorov complexity. In Proc. 22nd MFCS Conference, Springer Verlag LNCS 1295 (1997) 110–116.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tseitin, G.S. On the complexity of derivation in propositional calculus. In Studies in Constructive Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, Part 2. Consultants Bureau (1968) 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Urquhart, A.: Hard examples for resolution. Journal of the ACM 34 (1987) 209–219.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Torán, J. (1999). Lower Bounds for Space in Resolution. In: Flum, J., Rodriguez-Artalejo, M. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1683. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48168-0_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48168-0_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66536-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48168-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics