Skip to main content

Learning Relational Clichés with Contextual LGG

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1932))

Abstract

Top-down learners suffer often from the plateau problem (or myopia) of their greedy search algorithms. One way to address this is to extend the top-down greedy search, which grows the clauses, with relational clichés. Using clichés the search is no longer constrained to adding one literal at a time: combinations of literals instantiating clichés are tried as well. The paper presents CLUSE: Clichés Learned and USEd, a system that learns clichés that are then used either within a domain, or across domains. CLUSE is a bottom-up learner, in which generalization proceeds according to Contextual LGG (CLGG). CLGG is an extension of LGG that takes into account the context in which a pair of literals is generalized. The paper defines CLGG, illustrates how clichés are learned, and shows that the complexity of this learning is polynomial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bisson, G. (1990). “KBG: A Knowledge Based Generalizer.” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Machine Learning, Austin, Texas, Morgan Kaufmann, 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bisson, G. (1992). “Learning in FOL with a Similarity Measure.” Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, CA, Morgan Kaufmann, 82–87.

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Raedt, L. and M. Bruynooghe (1992). “An Overview of the Interactive Concept-Learner and Theory Revisor CLINT.” Inductive Logic Programming, Muggleton S. (ed.), Academic Press, 163–191.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kodratoff, Y. (1990). “Learning Expert Knowledge by Improving the Explanations Provided by the System.” Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach-Ill, Michalski R. S. and Y. Kodratoff (eds.), Morgan Kaufmann, 433–473.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Langley, P. (1996). Elements of Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morin, J. (1999). “Learning Relational Clichés with Contextual Generalization”. PhD Thesis, School of Information Technology and Engineering, University of Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morin, J. and S. Matwin (2000). “An Empirical Evaluation of Relational Clichés used Within and Across Domains.” Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Muggleton, S. and W. Buntine (1992). “Machine invention of first-order predicates by inverting resolution.” Inductive Logic Programming, Muggleton S. (eds.), Academic-Press, 261–280.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muggleton, S. and C. Feng (1992). “Efficient Induction of Logic Programs.” Inductive Logic Programming, Muggleton S. (eds.), Academic Press, 281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pazzani, M. and D. Kibler (1992). “The Utility of Knowledge in Inductive Learning.” Machine Learning, 9(l):57–94.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plotkin, G. (1970). “A note on inductive generalization.” Machine Intelligence, Meltzer, B. and D. Michie (eds.), Edinburg University Press, Edinburg, 5,153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Plotkin, G. (1971). “A Further Note on Inductive Generalization.” Machine Intelligence, Meltzer B. and D. Michie (eds.), 6,101–124, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quinlan, R. (1990). “Learning Logical Definitions from Relations.” Machine Learning, 5:239–266.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richards, B. L. and R. J. Mooney (1992). “Learning Relations by Pathfmding.” Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, CA, AAAI Press, 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rouveirol, C. (1991). “ITOU: Induction of First Order Theories.” Proceedings of the International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, Vienna de Castelo, Portugal, 127–151.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Silverstein, G. and M. Pazzani (1991). “Relational Clichés: Constraining constructive induction during relational learning.” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Machine Learning, Evanston, Illinois, Morgan Kaufmann, 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Morin, J., Matwin, S. (2000). Learning Relational Clichés with Contextual LGG. In: Raś, Z.W., Ohsuga, S. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1932. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39963-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39963-1_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41094-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39963-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics