Skip to main content

An Ontology Based Approach to Automated Negotiation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce IV. Designing Mechanisms and Systems (AMEC 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2531))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to automated negotiation that is particularly suitable to open environments, such as the Internet. In this approach agents can negotiate in any type of marketplace regardless of the negotiation mechanism in use. In order to support a wide variety of negotiation mechanisms, protocols are no longer hardcoded in the agents participating to negotiations, but are now expressed in terms of a shared ontology, thus making this approach particularly suitable for applications such as electronic commerce. The paper describes the negotiation ontology and provides a walkthrough example describing how the approach based on the negotiation ontology could be applied to the trading agent competition scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The “London Classification”. Technical report, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.C. Arpírez, O. Corcho, M. Fernández-López, and A. Gómez-Pérez. WebODE: A scalable workbench for ontological engineering. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP 2001. ACM-Sigmod, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Bartolini, C. Preist, and N.R. Jennings. A generic software framework for automated negotiation. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent Systems, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Berners-Lee. Weaving the Web. Orion Business: London, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Chalupsky. Ontomorph: A translation system for symbolic knowledge. In A.G. Cohn, F. Giunchiglia, and B. Selman, editors, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Proceedings of the seventh international conference (KR’2000), pages 471–482, San Francisco, CA, 2000. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Chandrasekaran, J.R. Josephson, and V.R. Benjamins. Ontology of task and methods. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW’98), Ban., Alberta, Canada, Ban., Alberta, Canada, 1998. University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Fensel, I. Horrocks, F. van Harmelen, D. L. McGuinness, and P. F. Patel-Scheider. The semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):24–25, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Gómez-Pérez. Knowledge sharing and reuse. In J. Liebowitz, editor, The Handbook of Applied Expert Systems, pages 10.1–10.36. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199–220, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Hendler. Agents and the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):30–37, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O. Ho.mann, M. Stumptner, and T. Chalabi. A perspective based approach to design. In Proceedings of the KI 2001 workshop on Planning, Scheduling and Configurations, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Frank van Harmelen. Reviewing the design of DAML+OIL: An ontology language for the semantic web. In Proc. of the 18th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2002), 2002. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, A. R. Lomuscio, S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and M. Wooldridge. Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2):199–215, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Kraus. Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments. Artificial Intelligence, 94(1-2):79–98, July 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Kraus. Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. Lassila and D. McGuinness. The role of frame-based representation on the semantic web. Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (ETAI) Journal: area The Semantic Web, To appear, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.R. Lomuscio, M. Wooldridge, and N.R. Jennings. A classification scheme for negotiation in electronic commerce. In F. Dignum and C. Sierra, editors, Agent mediated electronic commerce: a European perspecive, pages 19–33. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G.F. Luger. Artificial intelligence. Structures and strategies for complex problem solving. Addison Wesley-Pearson Education, Harlow, England, fourth edition, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Neches, R.E. Fikes, T. Finin, T.R. Gruber, R. Patil, T. Senator, and W.R. Swartout. Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Magazine, 12(3):36–56, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Newell. The knowledge level. Artificial intelligence, 18(1):87–127, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. S. Rosenschein and G. Zlotkin. Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Sandholm. Distributed rational decision making. In G. Weiß, editor, Multiagent Systems, pages 201–258. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. G. Smith. A Framework for Distributed Problem Solving. UMI Research Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Studer, V.R. Benjamins, and D. Fensel. Knowledge engineering, principles and methods. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 25(1-2):161–197, 1998.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Uschold, P. Clark, M. Healy, K. Williamson, and S. Woods. An experiment in ontology reuse. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW’98), Ban., Alberta, Canada, Ban., Alberta, Canada, 1998. University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. van Heijst, A.Th. Schreiber, and B.J. Wielinga. Using explicit ontologies in kbs development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45:184–292, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. P. Wellman, P. R. Wurman, K. O’Malley, R. Bangera, S.-de Lin, D. Reeves, and W. E. Walsh. Designing the market game for a trading agent competition. IEEE Internet Computing, 5(2):43–51, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Willmott, M. Calisti, and E. Rollon. Challenges in large-scale open agent mediated economies. In J. Padget, D.C. Parkes, N.M. Sadeh, and O.Shehory abd W.E. Walsh, editors, Proceedings of the AAMAS’02 workshop on agent mediated electronic commerce IV: designing mechanisms and systems, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P.R. Wurman, M.P. Wellman, and W.E. Welsh. A parametrization of the auction design space. Games and economic behavior, 35(1/2):304–338, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tamma, V., Wooldridge, M., Blacoe, I., Dickinson, I. (2002). An Ontology Based Approach to Automated Negotiation. In: Padget, J., Shehory, O., Parkes, D., Sadeh, N., Walsh, W.E. (eds) Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce IV. Designing Mechanisms and Systems. AMEC 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2531. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36378-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36378-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00327-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36378-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics