Skip to main content

Multi-Objective Structure Selection for RBF Networks and Its Application to Nonlinear System Identification

  • Chapter
Book cover Multi-Objective Machine Learning

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 16))

Abstract

Evolutionary multiobjective optimization approach to RBF networks structure determination is discussed in this chapter. The candidates of RBF network structure are encoded into the chromosomes in GAs and they evolve toward the Pareto optimal front defined by the several objective functions with regard to model accuracy and model complexity. Then, an ensemble of networks is constructed by using the Pareto optimal networks. We discuss its application to nonlinear system identification. Numerical simulation results indicate that the ensemble network is much more robust for the case of existence of outliers or lack of data, than the one selected based on information criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ljung L (1999) System Identification: Theory for the User, Prentice-Hall, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nelles O (2001) Nonlinear System Identification, Springer, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang Z J (1998) Identification of Nonlinear Systems, Journal of The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Vol.37, No.4, pp.249–255 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johansen T A (2000) Multi-objective identification of FIR models, Proceedings of IFAC Symposium on System Identification SYSID2000, Vol. 3, pp.917–922.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Johansen T A and BabuŠka R (2003) Multi-Objective Identification of Takagi- Sugeno Fuzzy Models, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol.11, No.6, pp. 847–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fonseca C M and Fleming P J (1993) Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization : Formulation, discussion and generalization, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp.416–423.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Katya R-V , Fonseca C M and Flemming P J (1997) Multiobjective Genetic Programming : A Non-Linear System Identification Application, Genetic Programming 97 Conference, pp. 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hatanaka T, Uosaki K and Hossaka Y (2002) Application of Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization to Nonlinear System Identification, Proceedings of the SICE Kansai Branch Symposium 2002, pp.54–56 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen S, Billings S A (1992) Neural networks for nonlinear dynamic system modelling and identification, International Journal of Control. Vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 319–346.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Sjoberg J, Zhang Qinghua, Ljung L, et.al. (1995) Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: a united overview, Automatica. Vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1691–1724.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Abbass H A (2003) Pareto Neuro-Evolution: Constructing Ensemble of Neural Networks Using Multi-objective Optimization, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 3, pp.2074–2080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abbass H A (2003) Pareto Neuro-Ensemble, Proceedings of the 16th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.554–566.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kondo N, Hatanaka T and Uosaki K (2004) Pareto RBF Networks Based on Multiobjective Evolutionary Computation, Proceedings of 2004 SICE Annual Conference, pp.2177–2182.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fieldsend, J E, Singh S (2005) Pareto evolutionary neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 16, No.2, pp.338–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hatanaka T, Uosaki K and Kuroda T (2001) Structure Selection of RBF Neural Network Using Information Criteria, Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information Engineering Systems and Allied Technologies, pp.166–170.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jin Y, Okabe T and Sendhoff B (2004) Neural network regularization and ensembling using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp.1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Islam M M, Yao X and Murase K (2003) A constructive algorithm for training cooperative neural network ensembles, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol.14, No.4, pp.820–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Akaike H (1974) A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol.19, pp. 716–723.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the Dimension of a Model, Annals of Statistics, Vol.7, No.2, pp.461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holland J (1975) Adaption in Natural and Artificial Systems, The University of Michigan Press, MI.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Bäck T (1996) Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice, Oxford Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Ono I and Kobayashi S (1997) A Real-coded Genetic Algorithm for Function Optimization Using Unimodal Normal Distribution Crossover, Proceedings of 7th International Conference.on Genetic Algorithms, pp.246–253.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sato H, Ono I and Kobayashi S (1997) A New Generation Alternation Model of Genetic Algorithms and Its Assessment, Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, Vol.12, No.5, pp.734–744.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hatanaka, T., Kondo, N., Uosaki, K. (2006). Multi-Objective Structure Selection for RBF Networks and Its Application to Nonlinear System Identification. In: Jin, Y. (eds) Multi-Objective Machine Learning. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 16. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33019-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33019-4_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30676-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33019-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics