Skip to main content

Low Latency Anonymous Communication – How Long Are Users Willing to Wait?

  • Conference paper
Emerging Trends in Information and Communication Security (ETRICS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 3995))

Abstract

One of the heavily discussed design questions for low latency anonymity systems is: “How much additional anonymity will the system provide by adding a certain amount of delay?” But current research on this topic ignores an important aspect of this question – the influence of the delay on the number of users and by this means on the anonymity provided. This paper shows some first experimental results in this area. Hopefully, it supports better design decisions for low latency anonymity systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berthold, O., Federrath, H., Köpsell, S.: Web MIXes: A System for Anonymous and Unobservable Internet Access. In: Federrath, H. (ed.) Designing Privacy Enhancing Technologies. LNCS, vol. 2009, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Cleveland, R.B., Cleveland, W.S., McRae, J.E., Terpenning, I.: STL: A Sesonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess. Journal of Official Statistics 6(1), 3–73 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chaum, D.: Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms. Communications of the ACM 24(2), 84–88 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Danezis, G., Dingledine, R., Mathewson, N.: Mixminion: Design of a Type III Anonymous Remailer Protocol. In: Proc. of the 2003 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (May 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dingledine, R., Mathewson, N., Syverson, P.: Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router. In: Proc. of the 13th USENIX Security Symposium (August 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dingledine, R.: Research question for Tor. Dagstuhl Seminar 05411: Anonymous Communication and its Applications, Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany (October 2005), http://freehaven.net/%7Earma/slides-dagstuhl05.pdf

  7. Galletta, D.F., Henry, R., McCoy, S., Polak, P.: Web Site Delays: How Tolerant are Users? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(1), 1–28 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoxmeier, J.A., DiCesare, C.: System response time and user satisfaction: An experimental study of browser-based applications. In: Proc. of the Association of Information Systems Americas Conference, Long Beach California (August 2000), pp. 140–145 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Business Maschines: Final Testing (2003), http://www-3.ibm.com/ibm/easy/eou_ext.nsf/Publish/609

  10. Kesdogan, D., Egner, J., Büschkes, R.: Stop-and-Go-MIXes Providing Probabilistic Anonymity in an Open System. In: Aucsmith, D. (ed.) IH 1998. LNCS, vol. 1525, p. 83. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Web-Site of MaxMind LLC (2005), http://www.maxmind.com/

  12. Miller, R.B.: Response time in man-computer conversational transaction. In: Proc. of AFIPS Fall Joint Computer conference, vol. 33, pp. 267–277 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Möller, U., Cottrell, L.: Mixmaster Protocol – Version 2. Unfinished draft (January 2000), http://www.eskimo.com/%7Erowdenw/crypt/Mix/draft-moeller-mixmaster2-protocol-00.txt

  14. Nah, F.: A study on tolerable waiting time: how long are Web users willing to wait? Behaviour & Information Technology, Special Issue on HCI in MIS 23 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nielsen, J.: Response times: the three important limits. In: Usability Engineering, ch. 5. Academic Press, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nielsen, J.: Guidelines for multimedia on the web. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox for December 1995 (1995), http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9512.html

  17. Nielsen, J.: Top ten mistakes in Web design. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox for May 1996 (1996), http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html

  18. Nielsen, J.: The need for speed. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox for March 1997 (1997), http://www.useit.com/alterbox/9703a.html

  19. Pfitzmann, A., Hansen, M.: Anonymity, Unlinkability, Unobservability, Pseudonymity, and Identity Management – A Consolidated Proposal for Terminology (November 2005), http://dud.inf.tu-dresden.de/Anon_Terminology.shtml

  20. Pfitzmann, A., Pfitzmann, B., Waidner, M.: ISDN-mixes: Untraceable communication with very small bandwidth overhead. In: Proc. of the GI/ITG Conference on Communication in Distributed Systems, pp. 451–463 (February 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  21. R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (2005), http://www.R-project.org/ ISBN 3-900051-07-0

  22. Ramsay, J., Barbesi, A., Preece, J.: A psychological investigation of long retrieval times on the world wide web. Interacting with Computers 10(1), 77–86 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rose, G.M., Evaristo, R., Straub, D.W.: Culture and Consumer Responses to Web download Time: A Four-Continent Study of Mono and Polychronism. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50(1), 31–44 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rose, G.M., Straub, D.W.: The effect of download time on consumer attitude toward the e-service retailer. e-Service Journal 1, 55–76 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reporters without borders: Saudi Arabia - 2005 annual report (2005), http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=13312

  26. Selvidge, P.: How long is too long for a website to load? Usability News 1(2) (1999), http://psychology.witchita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/1s/time_delay.htm

  27. Shneidermann, B.: Response time and display rate in human performance with computers. Computing Surveys 16, 265–285 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zona Research Inc.: The Economic Impacts of Unacceptable Web-Site Download Speeds (April 1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Köpsell, S. (2006). Low Latency Anonymous Communication – How Long Are Users Willing to Wait?. In: Müller, G. (eds) Emerging Trends in Information and Communication Security. ETRICS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3995. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11766155_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11766155_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34640-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34642-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics