Abstract
To build decision support systems for crime detection we need to examine for whom is the system built and how will it be used. In addressing this question we will develop a methodology for developing crime detection decision support systems. The methodology is based on a methodology for analyzing the aims of certain unlawful acts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bromby, M.C., Hall, M.J.J.: The Development and Rapid Evaluation of the Knowledge Model of ADVOKATE: an Advisory System to Assess the Credibility of Eyewitness Testimony. In: Proceedings of Eleventh International Conference on Legal Knowledge Based Systems, pp. 143–152. IOS Publications, Amsterdam
Chen, H., Chung, W., Xu, J.J., Wang, G., Qin, Y., Chau, M.: Crime data mining: a general framework and some examples. IEEE Computer 37(4) (2004)
Goldberg, H.G., Wong, R.W.H.: Restructuring Transactional Data for Link Analysis in the FinCEN AI System. In: Jensen, D., Goldberg, H. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Link analysis. Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium, Orlando, Florida, Tech report FS-98-01 (1998)
Horn, R.D., Birdwell, J.D., Leedy, L.W.: Link discovery tool. In: Proceedings of the Counterdrug Technology Assessment Center’s ONDCP/CTAC International Symposium Chicago, IL, August 18-22 (1997)
Kadane, J.B., Schum, D.A.: A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1996)
Keppens, J., Zeleznikow, J.: A Model Based Reasoning Approach for Generating Plausible Crime Scene Scenarios from Evidence. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 51–59. ACM Press, Edinburgh (2003)
Leary, R.M.: Evidential Reasoning and Analytical Techniques in Criminal Pre-Trial Fact Investigation. PHD Thesis, University College, London (2004)
Oatley, G., Zeleznikow, J., Ewart, B.: Matching and Predicting Crimes. In: Macintosh, A., Ellis, R., Allen, T. (eds.) Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XII. Proceedings of AI 2004, pp. 19–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Schum, D.A.: The Evidential Foundation of Probabilistic Reasoning. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1994)
Schum, D., Tillers, P.: Marshalling Evidence for Adversary Litigation. 13 Cardozo Law. Review 657, 657–704 (1991)
Tillers, P., Schum, D.: Charting New Territory in Judicial Proof: Beyond Wigmore, 9 Cardozo Law. Review. 907, 907–966 (1988)
Walton. Legal Argumentation and Evidence. The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, Pennsylvania (2002)
Wigmore, J.H.: The Principles of Judicial Proof. Little Brown and Company, Boston (1913)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zeleznikow, J., Oatley, G., Leary, R. (2005). A Methodology for Constructing Decision Support Systems for Crime Detection. In: Khosla, R., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3684. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11554028_115
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11554028_115
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28897-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31997-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)