Skip to main content

Abstract

Recent developments in organization theory about arrangements that are neither markets nor hierarchies provide an opportunity to reconsider the nature of cooperatives and their fundamental characteristics. The concept of “hybrids” developed by transaction cost economics to encapsulate the properties of these arrangements may be particularly relevant in that it provides a theoretical framework in which to embed cooperatives among other modes of governance. This paper goes in that direction and proposes a characterisation of different regimes among cooperatives, establishing a typology grounded in theory. An important result of this approach is that it challenges standard competition policies towards cooperatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A.A. and H. Demsetz. 1972. “Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62(5):777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonus, H. 1986. “The Cooperative Association as a Business Enterprise: a Study in the Economics of Transactions.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 142(3):310–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J. A. and F. H. Dark. 1987. “The Choice of Organizational Form: the Case of Franchising”. Journal of Financial Economics 18(2):401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. 1998. “New Institutional Economics.” American Economic Review 88(2):72–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M.L. 1995. “The Future of US Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-institutional Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77:1153–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M.L. and C. Iliopoulos. 2000. “Ill-defined Property Rights in Collective Action: The Case of US Agricultural Cooperatives.” In C. Mènard, ed. Institutions, Contracts and Organizations. Perspectives from New Institutional Economics. Cheltenham: E. Elgar, pp. 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M.L., F. R. Chaddad, and C. Iliopoulos. n.d. “Advances in Cooperative Theory since 1990: A Review of Agricultural Economics Literature”. Working Paper, University of Missouri-Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. 1981. “The Quasifirm in the Construction Industry.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2(4):335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, R. 2003. “Team Theory, Garbage Cans and Real Organizations: Some History and Prospects of Economic Research on Decision-making in Organizations.” Industrial and Corporate Change 12(4):753–797.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. and G. Soda. 1995. “Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms.” Organization Studies 16(2):183–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. 1993.”Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions In Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders.” American Economic Review 83(3):525–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. 1988. “The Ownership of the Firm.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization4(2):267–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrikse, G.W.J. and C.P. Veerman. 2001. “Marketing Cooperatives: An Incomplete Contract Perspective.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 52(1):53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrikse, G.W.J. and W.J.J. Bijman. 2002. “Ownership Structure in Agrifood Chains: The Marketing Cooperative.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(1):104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. 1988. “Asset Specificity and the Structure of Vertical Relationships.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4(1):95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. 2005. “Vertical Integration.” In C. Mènard and M. Shirley, eds. Handbook of New Institutional Analysis. Springer, pp. 319–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P. 2005. “The Make-or-Buy Decisions. Lessons from Empirical Studies.” In C. Mènard and M. Shirley, eds. Handbook of New Institutional Analysis. Springer, pp. 435–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, Francine and Kathrin Shaw (1999) “The Dynamics of Franchise Contracting: Evidence from Panel Data.” Journal of Political Economy. 107:1041–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of Economics. 8th ed. London: MacMillan. Reprint 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, C. 1996. “On Clusters, Hybrids and other Strange Forms. The Case of the French Poultry Industry.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 152(1):154–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, C. 2004. “The Economics of Hybrid Organizations.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160(4):345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, C. 2005a “A New Institutional Approach to Organization.” In C. Mènard and M. Shirley, eds. Handbook of New Institutional Analysis. Springer, pp. 281–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, C. 2005b. “The Inadequacy of Competition Policies: A New Institutional Approach.” In M. Oppenheimer and N. Mercuro, eds. Law and Economics: Alternative Economic Approaches to Legal and Regulatory Issues. New York: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, C. 2005c. “Oliver Williamson and the Economics of Hybrid Organizations.” in M. Augier, J. March and D. Teece (eds.), Title not yet determined, Oxford: Oxford University Press, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, C. 1997/2005. “Le Pilotage des Formes Organisationnelles Hybrides”, Revue Economique 48(2):741–751. English translation: “The Governance of Hybrid Organizational Forms.” In C. Mènard, ed. The International Library of New Institutional Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, vol. IV, pp. 105– 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, C. and M.M. Shirley. 2005. Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Berlin-Boston-Dordrecht-New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, C. and E. Valceschini. 2005. “Institutions for Governing Agriculture and Rural Areas.” European Review of Agricultural Economics, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palay, T.M. 1985. “Avoiding Regulatory Constraints: Contracting Safeguards and the Role of Informal Agreements.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1(1):155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. 1996. “Inter-organizational Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 152(1):197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynaud, E. 1997. Propriètè et exploitation partagèe d’une marque commerciale: alèas contractuels et ordre privè. PhD dissertation, Universitè de Paris (Panthèon-Sorbonne).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, M. and O. Williamson. 1985. “Asset Specificity and Economic Organization. ”International Journal of Industrial Organization 3(5):365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P. H. 1978. “The Theory of the Firm and the Structure of the Franchise Contract.” Journal of Law and Economics 21(1):223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvée,L. 1997. “Managing a Brand in the Tomato Sector: Authority and Enforcement Mechanisms in a Collective Organization.” Acta Horticulturae 536:537–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvée,L. 2002. “Governance in Strategic Networks.” Working Paper, ISAB: Beauvais.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staatz, J. M. 1989. Farmer Cooperative Theory: Recent Developments. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, ACS Agr. Coop. Service Research Rep. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. 1990. Information and Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, H.B. 1986. “Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies.” Strategic Management Journal 7(1):37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1991. [1996] “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives.” Administrative Science Quarterly 36(2):269–296. Reproduced in The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ménard, C. (2007). Cooperatives: Hierarchies or Hybrids?. In: Vertical Markets and Cooperative Hierarchies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5543-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics