Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of different treatment modalities for closure of oro-antral communications and formulation of a rational approach

  • Comparative Study
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oro-antral communication is a common occurrence following removal of maxillary premolars and molars because of anatomic proximity of root apices of these teeth and maxillary antrum. Various methods have been described in literature for closure of these communications which vary from simple local methods like buccal advancement flap to complex distal flaps and grafts. Out of these plethora of the treatment modalities available for the treatment of oro antral fistula, the most simple and commonly used ones are either the buccal flap or the buccal pad of fat. In our study we compared the results, advantages and disadvantages of using buccal advancement technique and buccal fat pad individually and also in combination. With this paper, we aim to shed light on the efficacy of buccal pad of fat and the buccal flap, either alone or together, for the closure of OAF of various regions. We also aim to provide a systematic and rational approach for repair of oro-antral communications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Von Wowern N (1971) Oro-antral Communications and Displacements of Roots Into The Maxillary Sinus: A Followup Of 231 Cases. J Oral Surg 29(9): 622–627

    Google Scholar 

  2. Punwutikorn J, Waikakul A, Pairuchvej V (1994) Clinically Significant Oroantral Communication-A Study of Incidence and Site. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 23(1): 19–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Watzak G, Tepper G, Zechner W, Monov G, Busenlechner D, Watzek G (2005) Bony Press-Fit Closure Of Oro-Antral Fistulas: A Technique For Pre-Sinus Lift Repair And Secondary Closure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(9): 1288–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrl Pa (1980) Oro-antral Communication: Empirical Study Of 175 Patients, With Special Concern To Secondary Operative Closure. Int J Oral Surg 9(5): 351–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Axhausen G: Zur Methodic Des Verschlusses Von Defekten Im Alveolarforsatz Oberkiefer. Deutsche Monatschrift Fur Zahnheilkunde 1930;48:193–196. Cited In Awang MN (1988) Closure Of Oro-antral Fistula. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 17 (2): 110–115

    Google Scholar 

  6. Licameli GR, Dolan R (1998) Buccinator Musculomucosal Flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(1): 69–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck BW, Powers MP (2000) Soft Tissue Considerations, in Fonseca RJ, Powers MP, Barber HD (eds): Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Vol 7, Ed1. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 348

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stuzin JM, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto HK, Baker TJ, Wolfe SA (1990) The Anatomy And Clinicl Applications Of Buccal Fat Pad. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(1): 29–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stuzin JM, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto HK, Baker TJ, Anthony WS (1990) The Anatomy and Clinical Application of Buccal Fat Pad. Plast Recon Surg 85(1): 29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Egyedi P (1977) Utilization of Buccal Fat Pad For Closure Of Oro-Antral And/Or Oro-Nasal Communication. J Maxillofac Surg 5(4): 241–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tideman H, Bosanquet A, Scott J (1986) Use of The Buccal Fat Pad As A Pedicle Graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(6): 435–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marx RE (1988) Discussion of Reconstruction of Maxilla With Bone Grafts Supported By BFP. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46: 100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A Abubara, Alv Cortez, La Passeri, M De Moraes, Rwf Moraes (2006) Evaluation of Different Treatments For Oro-antral/Oronasal Communication Experiences Of 112 Cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35(2): 155–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanzawa Y, Itoh K, Mabashi T, Sato K (1995) Closure of Oro-antral Communication Using A Pedicle Buccal Fat Pad Graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53(7): 771–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rapidis AP, Alexandridis CA, Eleflheriadis E, Angelopaulos AP (2000) The Use of BFP For Reconstruction Of Oral Defects: Review Of Literature And Report Of 15 Cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58(2): 158–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salins PC, Kishore SK (1996) Anteriorly based palatal flap for closure of large oro-antral fistula. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82(3): 253–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin Granizo R, Naval L, Costas A, Goizueta C, Rodriguez F, Monje F, Munoz M, Diaj F (1997) Use Of Buccal Fat Pad To Repair Intraoral Defects: Review Of 30 Cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35(2): 81–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemant Batra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batra, H., Jindal, G. & Kaur, S. Evaluation of different treatment modalities for closure of oro-antral communications and formulation of a rational approach. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 9, 13–18 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-010-0006-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-010-0006-y

Keywords

Navigation