Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Revision of Heterosavia, stat. nov., with notes on Gonatogyne and Savia (Phyllanthaceae)

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterosavia (Phyllanthaceae) is segregated from Savia (tribe Bridelieae), recognized at generic rank, and placed in tribe Phyllantheae. Floral, fruit, leaf anatomical, leaf venation, and pollen characters of the neotropical taxa previously united as Savia including Gonatogyne are discussed and illustrated. Keys to the three genera and to the species of Heterosavia are presented. Four species (all new combinations), Heterosavia bahamensis, H. erythroxyloides, H. laurifolia, and H. maculata, are recognized. The new combinations Heterosavia laurifolia var. intermedia and H. maculata var. clementis are proposed. The names Heterosavia, H. erythroxyloides, H. laurifolia, Savia clementis, S. clusiifolia, S. clusiifolia var. fallax, and S. longipes are lectotypified. Distribution maps and conservation assessments (IUCN ratings) of Heterosavia species and varieties are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adams, C. D. 1972. Flowering plants of Jamaica. University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica.

  • Alain, H. (E. E. Liogier). 1952. Estudios en Euforbiáceas Cubanas. Contribuciones ocasionales del Museo de Historia Natural del Colegio de la Salle, La Habana, 11: 1–12.

  • ———. 1953. Dicotiledoneas: Malpighiaceae a Myrtaceae. In: H. Leon (J. S. Sauget) & H. Alain (E. E. Liogier), eds. Flora de Cuba 3. P. Fernandez, La Habana, Cuba.

  • ———. 1986. La flora de la Española 4. Ediciones de la Universidad Central del Este, San Pedro de Macoris, Dominican Republic.

  • Baillon, H. 1858. Étude générale du groupe des Euphorbiacées. 1–684. Victor Masson, Paris.

  • ———. 1861. Euphorbiacées africaines. 2. Afrique orientale. Adansonia 2: 27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthlott, W. & N. Ehler. 1977. Raster-Elektronenmikroskopie der Epidermis-Oberflächen von Spermatophyten. Tropische und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 19: 367–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G. 1878. Notes on Euphorbiaceae. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 17: 185–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— & J. D. Hooker. 1880. Genera plantarum 3(1). 1–447. Lovell Reeve & Co., Williams & Norgate, London.

  • Borhidi, A. 1985. Phytogeographic survey of Cuba. 1. The phytogeographic characteristics and evolution of the flora of Cuba. Acta Botanica Hungarica 31: 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Phytogeography and vegetation ecology of Cuba. 1–858. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

  • Britton, N. L. 1904. Savia bahamensis sp. nov. Torreya 4: 104–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1916. Studies of West Indian plants 8. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 43: 441–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— & C. F. Millspaugh. 1920. The Bahama flora. The authors, New York.

  • Correll, D. S. & H. B. Correll. 1982. Flora of the Bahama archipelago including the Turks and Caicos Islands. J. Cramer, Vaduz.

  • Croizat, L. 1943. Notes on American Euphorbiaceae, with description of eleven new species. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 33: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehay, C. 1935. L’appareil libero-ligneux foliaire des Euphorbiacées. Annales des sciences naturelles, botanique série 10, vol. 17: 147–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greuter, W., F. R. Barrie, H. M. Burdet, W. G. Chaloner, V. Demoulin, D. L. Hawksworth, P. M. Jorgensen, D. H. Nicholson, P. C. Silva, P. Trehane & J. McNeill. 1994. International code of botanical nomenclature. Regnum Vegetabile 131: 1–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisebach, A. H. R. 1860. Plantae wrightianae 1. Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, new series, 8: 1–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1865. Diagnosen neuer Euphorbiaceen aus Cuba. Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften und der Georg-August-Universität zu Göttingen 6: 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, S. M. & W. J. Hayden. 1996. A revision of Discocarpus (Euphorbiaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 83: 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, L. J. 1971. Evolutionary significance of leaf architectural features in the woody dicots [Abstract]. American Journal of Botany 58: 469.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. In: C. R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk, eds. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, 2nd edition, volume 1: 25–39. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, P. 1994. A contribution to the systematics of Andrachne sect. Phyllanthopsis and sect. Pseudophyllanthus compared with Savia s.l. (Euphorbiaceae) with special reference to floral morphology. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 116: 321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Revision of the genus Wielandia (Euphorbiaceae-Phyllanthoideae). Adansonia, série 3, 20: 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— & G. McPherson. 1998. Revision of the genus Blotia (Euphorbiaceae-Phyllanthoideae). Adansonia, série 3, 20: 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— & ———. 2007. Revision of Wielandia including Blotia and Petalodiscus (Phyllanthaceae, Euphorbiaceae s.l.). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 94: 519–553.

  • ———, H. Kathriarachchi & K. J. Wurdack. 2006. A phylogenetic classification of Phyllanthaceae (Malpighiales; Euphorbiaceae sensu lato). Kew Bulletin 61: 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. A. 1973. The vegetation of the Antilles. In: A. Graham, ed. Vegetation and vegetational history of northern Latin America: 1–38. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List categories: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K., http://www.IUCNredlist.org/info/categories_criteria2001

  • Kathriarachchi, H., P. Hoffmann, R. Samuel, K. J. Wurdack & M. W. Chase. 2005. Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthaceae inferred from five genes (plastid atpB, matK, 3′ndhF, rbcL, and nuclear PHYC). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 112–134.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klotzsch, J. F. 1841. Neue and weniger gekannte südamerikanische Euphorbiaceen-Gattungen. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 7(1): 175–204, Figs. 7, 8 and 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, J. G. 1935. Uma nova espécie do gênero Securinega (Euphorbiaceas). Arqivos do Instituto de Biologia Vegetal, Rio de Janeiro, 1(3): 241–242, t. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leandri, J. 1937. Sur la distribution et les affinités des Phyllanthées de Madagascar. Bulletin de la Societé Botanique de France 84: 61–72, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1958. Euphorbiacées 1 (Phyllanthoideae). In: H. Humbert, ed. Flore de Madagascar et des Comores, 111e famille. 1–199. Firmin-Didot, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, G. A. 1986a. Systematic foliar morphology of Phyllanthoideae (Euphorbiaceae). I. Conspectus. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 29–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986b. Systematic foliar morphology of Phyllanthoideae (Euphorbiaceae). II. Phenetic analysis. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986c. Systematic foliar morphology of Phyllanthoideae (Euphorbiaceae). III. Cladistic analysis. Systematic Botany 11(4): 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, E. L. Jr. 1953. Check list of native and naturalized trees of the United States (including Alaska). Forest Service, Washington.

  • ———. 1978. Atlas of United States trees, volume 5. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Florida.

  • Long, R. W. & O. Lakela. 1971. A flora of tropical Florida; a manual of the seed plants and ferns of southern peninsular Florida. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida.

  • Lundell, C. L. 1942. Studies of American spermatophytes 2. Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium 7: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, P. 1924. Blütenmorphologische Untersuchungen an den Euphorbiaceen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Phylogenie der Angiospermenblüte. Botanische Abhandlungen 3: 1–150, t. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. 1866. Euphorbiaceae. In: A. de Candolle, ed. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 15(2): 189–1286. Victor Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1873–1874. Euphorbiaceae. In: C. F. P. Martius, ed. Flora brasiliensis 11(2). 1–752. Fleischer, München, Wien, Leipzig.

  • Pax, F. 1890–1896. Euphorbiaceae. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 1. Auflage, 3(5). 1–119, 456–458. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.

  • ———. 1924. Die Phylogenie der Euphorbiaceae. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 59: 129–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— & K. Hoffmann. 1922. Euphorbiaceae - Phyllanthoideae - Phyllantheae. In: A. Engler, ed. Das Pflanzenreich, Heft 81. 1–349. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— & ———. 1931. Euphorbiaceae. In: A. Engler, ed. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2. Auflage, Bd. 19 c: 11–233. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— & ———. 1933. Über die Stellung der Gattung Gonatogyne innerhalb der Euphorbiaceae. Repertorium specierum novarum regni vegetabilis 31: 190–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punt, W. 1962. Pollen morphology of the Euphorbiaceae with special reference to taxonomy. Wentia 7: 1–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, G. R. 1984. Flora of the Cayman Islands. H. M. S. O., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe-Smith, A. 1987. Euphorbiaceae (Part 1). In: R. M. Polhill, ed. Flora of tropical East Africa. 1–407. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam & Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Genera Euphorbiacearum. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.

  • Reeves, R. D., A. M. J. Baker, A. Borhidi & R. Berazaín. 1996. Nickel-accumulating plants from the ancient serpentine soil of Cuba. New Phytologist 133: 217–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, ——— & ———. 1999. Nickel hyperaccumulation in the serpentine floras of Cuba. Annals of Botany 83: 29–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, A. 1850. Botanica 2. In: R. de la Sagra, ed. Historia fisica, politica y natural de la Isla de Cuba, vol 11. 1–339. A. Bertrand, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothdauscher, H. 1896. Ueber die anatomischen Verhältnisse von Blatt and Axe der Phyllantheen (mit Ausschluß der Euphyllantheen). Botanisches Centralblatt 68: 65–393 (in 10 parts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scurlock, J. P. 1987. Native trees and shrubs of the Florida keys: a field guide. Laurel Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, J. K. 1933. Manual of the southeastern flora. The author, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. B. & R. J. Downs. 1964. Kleinodendron, novo gênero de Euforbiáceas. Sellowia 16: 175–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, W. L. 1967. Kleinodendron and xylem anatomy of Cluytieae (Euphorbiaceae). American Journal of Botany 54: 663–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuppy, W. 1996. Systematische Morphologie und Anatomie der Samen der biovulaten Euphorbiaceen. Ph.D. Dissertation., Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Kaiserslautern, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, I. 1902–1903. Nova genera et species II. In: I. Urban, ed. Symbolae Antillanae 3(2/3): 280–420. Gebr. Borntraeger, Leipzig.

  • ———. 1924. Plantae cubenses novae vel rariores a clo. Er. L. Ekman lectae II. In: I. Urban, ed. Symbolae Antillanae 9(2): 177–272. Gebr. Borntraeger, Leipzig.

  • ———. 1930. Sertum Antillanum 30. Repertorium specierum novarum regni vegetabilis 28: 209–235

    Google Scholar 

  • van Cotthem, W. R. J. 1971. Vergleichende morphologische Studien über Stomata und eine neue Klassifikation ihrer Typen. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 84: 141–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorontsova, M. & P. Hoffmann. 2007. First record of pistillate flowers of Paranecepsia (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto). Kew Bulletin, 62: 285–286.

  • ——— & ———. 2008. A Phylogenetic classification of tribe Poranthereae (Phyllanthaceae, Euphorbiaceae sensu lato). Kew Bulletin 63: 1–19.

  • ———, ——— & M. W. Chase. 2005. Evolution of the Andrachne clade (Phyllanthaceae or Euphorbiaceae s.l.). XVII International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria. Abstracts: 416.

  • Webster, G. L. 1967. The genera of Euphorbiaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 48: 303–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1970. A revision of Phyllanthus (Euphorbiaceae) in the continental United States. Brittonia 22: 44–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. Systematic status of the genus Kleinodendron (Euphorbiaceae). Taxon 31: 535–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. A revision of Flueggea (Euphorbiaceae). Allertonia 3: 259–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994a. Classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81: 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994b. Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa of Euphorbiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81: 33–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, E. & L. E. Arnold. 1956. The native trees of Florida. 1–218. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, H. W. 1979. The plant surface (mainly leaf), part 1: stomata. In: C. R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk, eds. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, 2nd edition, volume 1: 97–117. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willdenow, C. L. 1806. Species plantarum, ed. 4, vol. 4.2: 631–1157. G. C. Nauk, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. C. 1939. A miscellany of New World Euphorbiaceae II. Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 127: 48–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurdack, K. J., P. Hoffmann, R. Samuel, A. Y. de Bruijn, M. van der Bank & M. W. Chase. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Phyllanthaceae (Phyllanthoideae pro parte, Euphorbiaceae sensu lato) using plastid rbcL DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 91: 1882–1900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I gratefully acknowledge the following herbaria for granting me access to their collections: A, B, BM, CHAPA, G, GH, GOET, HAC, HAJB, HBG, JE, M, MEXU, MICH, MO, NY, P, S, US, and XAL. I thank Prof. E. Köhler (BHU) for his invaluable support, J. Ueckert (formerly BHU) for assistance for her friendship and support with photography and lab work, Dr I. Cordeiro (SP) for additional material of Gonatogyne and Savia, Prof. W. Greuter (B) and Dr. R. K. Brummitt (K) for help with nomenclatoral queries, Prof. R. D. Reeves (Massey University, New Zealand), and Prof. A. M. J. Baker (University of Melbourne, Australia) for sharing and discussing their Ni content data with me, Prof. H. H. Hilger, Dr. S. Rogaschewski, Dr. W. Wenzel, Ms Domes, Ms Grüber, Ms Ritter, and Ms Weise (all Berlin) for access to and assistance with the SEM, H. Wilks (K) for drawing Fig. 11, M. Vorontsova (K) for help with IUCN ratings, and J. Stone (K) for preparing the figures for publication. G. Levin (ILLS) and an anonymous reviewer provided valuable comments on the manuscript. Fieldwork in Cuba was conducted in collaboration with the Jardin Botanico Nacional, La Habana.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Hoffmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffmann, P. Revision of Heterosavia, stat. nov., with notes on Gonatogyne and Savia (Phyllanthaceae). Brittonia 60, 136–166 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12228-008-9012-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12228-008-9012-5

Key Words

Navigation