Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“As a Shepherd Divideth his Sheep from the Goats”: Does the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale Encapsulate Separable Theistic and Civility Components?

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous studies suggest spirituality and subjective well-being (SWB) are positively associated. However, critics argue that popular spirituality instruments—including the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale (DSES)—contain items that conflate religiosity/spirituality (R/S), prosociality and SWB. Advocates of the DSES retort that, despite this concern, the available evidence confirms a single underlying factor. The current paper evaluates the DSES’s development, factor structure, reliability and convergent and predictive validity using a community sample. Despite the full DSES scale’s excellent internal reliability, two related factors—theism and civility—are identified. Both scales are reliable and converge meaningfully with related R/S measures. As expected, given previous findings, the full DSES scale predicts higher SWB yet the two subscales display divergent associations. This finding offers new insights into the DSES and raises questions about the claimed belief-as-benefit effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2007). Religious people and paranormal beliefs: Alike or different? Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, M. G., & Fagley, N. S. (2005). Appreciation: Individual differences in finding value and meaning as a unique predictor for subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 73(1), 79–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bash, A. (2004). Spirituality: The emperor’s new clothes? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13(1), 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. F., Griffin, M., & Vice, S. (2001). Affective reactions to auditory hallucinations in psychotic, evangelic and control groups. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, C., & Fan, D. (2008). Daily spiritual experiences and psychological well-being among US adults. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 247–271. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9187-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-Revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample-size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henningsgaard, J. M., & Arnau, R. C. (2008). Relationship between religiosity, spirituality and personality: A multivariate analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. C. (2005). Measurement in the psychology of religion and spirituality: Current status and evaluation. In R. F. Palutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of religion and spirituality (pp. 43–61). Guildford: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality. American Psychologist, 58, 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issacowitz, D. M., Valliant, G. E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2003). Strengths and satisfaction across the adult lifespan. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 57, 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkstein, S., & Tower, R. B. (2009). The Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale and well-being: Demographic comparisons and scale validation with older Jewish adults and a diverse internet sample. Journal of Religion and Health, 48(4), 402–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapuscinski, A. N., & Master, K. S. (2010). The current status of measures of spirituality: A critical review of scale development. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2(4), 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (2008). Concerns about measuring “spirituality” in research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196(5), 349–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (2009). Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: A review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54(5), 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loustalot, F., Wyatt, S., Boss, B., May, W., & McDyess, T. (2006). Psychometric examination of the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 13(3), 162–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., Larson, D. B., Koenig, H. G., & Thoresen, C. (2000). Religious involvement and mortality: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 19, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mochon, D., Norton, M. I. & Ariely, D. (2010). Who benefits from religion? Social Indicators Research. online, doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9637-0.

  • Myers, D. G. (2008). Religion and human flourishing. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 323–346). Guilford Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. M., Fong, T. C. T., Tsui, E. Y. L., Au-Yeung, F. S. W., & Law, S. K. (2009). Validation of the Chinese version of underwood’s daily spiritual experience scale—transcending cultural boundaries? International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16(2), 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322(5898), 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. L. (2007). Religiousness/spirituality and health: A meaning system perspective. Journal of Behaviorial Medicine, 30, 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, R., & Sandivk, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for cross-method convergence of self-report well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou, V. (2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A five-factor model perspective. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 149(1), 108–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G., & Skrzypinska, K. (2006). Spiritual but not religious? Evidence for two independent dispositions. Journal of Personality, 74(5), 1257–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. B. (2010). “Moved by the spirit”: Does spirituality moderate the interrelationships between subjective well-being subscales? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(7), 709–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. B. (2011). Is it God or just the data that moves in mysterious ways? How well-being research may be mistaking faith for virtue. Social Indicators Research, 100, 313–330. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9637-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behaviour. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd edn). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuang, M. T., & Simpson, J. C. (2008). Commentary on Koenig (2008): Concerns about measuring ‘spirituality’ in research. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196(8), 647–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, L. G., (1999). Daily spiritual experiences. In Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research: A report of the Fetzer Institute/National Institute of Aging Working Group (pp. 11–17). Kalamazoo: John E. Fetzer Institute.

  • Underwood, L. G. (2006). Ordinary spiritual experience: Qualitative research, interpretive guidelines, and population distribution for the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale. Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv fur Religionpsychologie, 28(1), 181–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, L. G. (2008). Measuring “spirituality”. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196(9), 715–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinnbauer, B. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2005). Religiousness and spirituality. In R. F. Palutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of religion and spirituality (pp. 21–40). Guildford: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B. C., Rye, M. S., Butter, E. M., Belavich, T. G., et al. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 549–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Ms Anna Kelly and Dr. Rob Buckingham for their invaluable input to this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia

    James Benjamin Schuurmans-Stekhoven

Authors
  1. James Benjamin Schuurmans-Stekhoven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Benjamin Schuurmans-Stekhoven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J.B. “As a Shepherd Divideth his Sheep from the Goats”: Does the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale Encapsulate Separable Theistic and Civility Components?. Soc Indic Res 110, 131–146 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9920-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9920-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation