Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classifier effects on human categorization: the role of shape classifiers in Mandarin Chinese

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chinese is a language that classifies nouns into groups on the basis of shape, material, and size. We asked whether the classification of nouns by shape affects the degree to which Chinese speakers rely on shape when classifying objects. Three experiments examined the degree to which Chinese- and English-speaking adults rely on shape versus taxonomic or functional similarity in a classification task. Across all three experiments, Chinese speakers made significantly more shape choices than English speakers though they both mostly classified objects on the basis of taxonomic or functional similarity. Reliance on shape by speakers of Chinese was correlated with amount of exposure to Chinese. The results offer evidence in support of the idea that language influences categorization, or a weak form of the Whorf Hypothesis. The results also call into question the widely-held belief that speakers of all classifier languages pay less attention to shape in classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan Keith. (1977) Classifiers. Language 53: 285–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown Roger W. (1961) Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. In: Saporta Sol., Batian Jarvis R. (eds) Psycholinguistics: A book of readings. Holt, New York, pp 503–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey Susan. (1985) Conceptual change in childhood. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, John B., and Joseph B. Casagrande. 1958. The function of language classifications in behavior. In Readings in social psychology, ed. Eleanor E. Maccoby, Theodore Mead Newcomb and Eugene Leonard Hartley, 3rd ed., 1–30. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

  • Cole Michael, Sylvia Scribner. (1974) Culture and thought : A psychological introduction. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, Lloyd M., and Leota M. Dunn. 1981. Peabody picture vocabulary test (rev. ed.). Circle Pines. MN: American Guidance Service for Pictures.

  • Gelman Susan., Markman Ellen M. (1987) Young children’s inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development 58: 1532–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen Chad. (1983) Language and logic in ancient China. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutsumi Imai, Gentner Dedre. (1997) A cross linguistic study on early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition 62: 169–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil Frank C. (1989) Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke John. (1690) An essay concerning human understanding, A.D. Woozley. Meridian, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons John. (1992) Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons John. (1977) Semantics. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclay Horwad. (1958) An experimental study of language and non-linguistic behavior. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 14: 220–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman Ellen. M., Hutchinson Jean. (1984) Children’s sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology 16: 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazuka Reiko, Friedman Ronald (2000) Linguistic relativity in Japanese and English: Is language the primary determinant in object classification?. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9(4): 353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt Bernd, Zhang Shi (1998) Language structure and categorization: A study of classifiers in consumer cognition, judgment, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research 25: 108–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sera Maria D., Chryle Elieff, James Forbes, Melissa Burch, Wanda Rodríguez, Poulin-Dubois Diane (2002) When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology 131(3): 377–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Edward E., Medin Douglas L. (1981) Concepts and Categories. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Shi, Schmitt Bernd. (1998) Language-dependent classification: The mental representation of classifiers in cognition, memory, and ad Evaluations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 4: 375–358

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenny Yi-chun Kuo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuo, J.Yc., Sera, M.D. Classifier effects on human categorization: the role of shape classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. J East Asian Linguist 18, 1–19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9036-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9036-6

Keywords

Navigation