Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An economic analysis of payment for health care services: The United States and Switzerland compared

  • Published:
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article seeks to assess whether physician payment reforms in the United States and Switzerland were likely to attain their objectives. We first introduce basic contract theory, with the organizing principle being the degree of information asymmetry between the patient and the health care provider. Depending on the degree of information asymmetry, different forms of payment induce “appropriate” behavior. These theoretical results are then pitted against the RBRVS of the United States to find that a number of its aspects are not optimal. We then turn to Switzerland’s Tarmed and find that it fails to conform with the prescriptions of economic contract theory as well. The article closes with a review of possible reforms that could do away with uniform fee schedules to improve the performance of the health care system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayanian J.Z., Hauptman P.J., Guadagnoli E., Antman E.M., Pashos C.L., McNeil B.J. (1994) Knowledge and practices of generalist and specialist physicians regarding drug therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine 331(17): 1136–1142. doi:10.1056/NEJM199410273311707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard C.L., Shove J.B., Whalley J. (1985) General equilibrium computations of the marginal welfare costs of taxes in the United States. The American Economic Review 75: 128–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell H.F., Bond K.A. (1997) The cost of public funds in Australia. The Economic Record 73: 22–24. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.1997.tb00976.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey T.S., Garrett J., Jackman A., McLaughlin C., Fryer J., Smucker D.R. (1995) The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. The New England Journal of Medicine 333(14): 913–917. doi:10.1056/NEJM199510053331406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin M., Friedmann P., Cassel C., Lang R. (1997) Differences in generalist and specialist physicians’ knowledge and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for congestive heart failure. Journal of General Internal Medicine 12(9): 523–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston K. (2005) Multitasking and mixed systems for provider payment. Journal of Health Economics 24(1): 211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidgenössisches Volkswirtschaftsdepartement.Preisüberwachung. (1999). Stellungnahme zu den Tarifen GRAT/Infra. Bern: EDMZ (31.3.1999).

  • Getzen T. (2007) Health economics and health financing. New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrold L.R., Field T.S., Gurwitz J.H. (1999) Knowledge, patterns of care, and outcomes of care for generalists and specialists. Journal of General Internal Medicine 14(8): 499–511. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.08168.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström B. (1979) Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics 10(1): 74–91. doi:10.2307/3003320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström B., Milgrom P. (1991) Multi-task principal agent analysis: Incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 7: 26–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao W.C., Braun P., Dunn D., Becker E.R. (1988) Resource-based relative values. An overview. Journal of the American Medical Association 260(16): 2347–2353. doi:10.1001/jama.260.16.2347

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont J.-J., Tirole J. (1993) A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Page J., Weber R., Somaini B., Nöstlinger C., Donath K., Jaccard R. (2003) Quality of generalist vs. specialty care for people with HIV on antiretroviral treatment: a prospective cohort study. HIV Medicine 4(3): 276–286. doi:10.1046/j.1468-1293.2003.00157.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Physician Payment Review Commission. (1988). Annual report to congress. Washington, DC.

  • Robinson J.C. (2001) Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. The Milbank Quarterly 79(2): 149–177. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan M., Gerard K. (2003) Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: Current practice and future reflections. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 2(1): 55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai-Seale M., McGuire T., Zhang W. (2007) Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Services Research 42(5): 1871–1894. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00689.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telser H., Zweifel P. (2002) Measuring willingness-to-pay for risk reduction: An application of conjoint analysis. Health Economics 11(3): 129–139 IM TEXT: 1999 (Seite 4)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel P., Breyer F., Kifmann M. (2009) Health economics, 2nd ed. Springer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel P., Lehmann Hj., Steinmann L. (2003) Patching up the physician-patient relationship. In: Lindgren B. (eds) Arne Ryde symposium. Lund University Press, Lund, pp 207–233

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Zweifel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zweifel, P., Tai-Seale, M. An economic analysis of payment for health care services: The United States and Switzerland compared. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 9, 197–210 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-009-9061-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-009-9061-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation