Abstract
Over the past four or five decades many advances have been made in earthquake ground-motion prediction and a variety of procedures have been proposed. Some of these procedures are based on explicit physical models of the earthquake source, travel-path and recording site while others lack a strong physical basis and seek only to replicate observations. In addition, there are a number of hybrid methods that seek to combine benefits of different approaches. The various techniques proposed have their adherents and some of them are extensively used to estimate ground motions for engineering design purposes and in seismic hazard research. These methods all have their own advantages and limitations that are not often discussed by their proponents. The purposes of this article are to: summarise existing methods and the most important references, provide a family tree showing the connections between different methods and, most importantly, to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Some of the programs for ground-motion prediction are available for download from the ORFEUS Seismological Software Library http://www.orfeus-eu.org/Software/softwarelib.html
References
Abrahamson NA, Shedlock KM (1997) Overview. Seismological Research Letters 68(1):9–23
Abrahamson NA, Somerville PG, Cornell CA (1990) Uncertainty in numerical strong motion predictions. In: Proceedings of the fourth U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, vol 1, pp 407–416
Abrahamson N, Atkinson G, Boore D, Bozorgnia Y, Campbell K, Chiou B, Idriss IM, Silva W, Youngs R (2008) Comparisons of the NGA ground-motion relations. Earthq Spectra 24(1):45–66. doi:10.1193/1.2924363
Aki K (1982) Strong motion prediction using mathematical modeling techniques. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72(6):S29–S41
Aki K (2003) A perspective on the history of strong motion seismology. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 137:5–11
Aki K, Larner KL (1970) Surface motion of a layered medium having an irregular interface due to incident plane SH waves. Journal of Geophysical Research 75(5):933–954
Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative Seismology. University Science Books, Sausalito, California, USA
Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2006) Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35(9):1145–1165
Ambraseys NN (1974) The correlation of intensity with ground motion. In: Advancements in Engineering Seismology in Europe, Trieste
Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sigbjörnsson R, Berge-Thierry C, Suhadolc P, Costa G, Smit PM (2004a) Dissemination of European strong-motion data, vol 2. In: Proceedings of thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, paper no. 32
Ambraseys NN, Smit P, Douglas J, Margaris B, Sigbjörnsson R, Ólafsson S, Suhadolc P, Costa G (2004b) Internet site for European strong-motion data. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 45(3):113–129
Anderson JG (1991) Strong motion seismology. Rev Geophys 29(Part 2):700–720
Anderson JG (1997a) Benefits of scenario ground motion maps. Engineering Geology 48(1–2):43–57
Anderson JG (1997b) Nonparametric description of peak acceleration above a subduction thrust. Seismological Research Letters 68(1):86–93
Anderson JG (2004) Quantitative measure of the goodness-of-fit of synthetic seismograms. In: Proceedings of thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, paper no. 243
Anderson G, Aagaard BT, Hudnut K (2003) Fault interactions and large complex earthquakes in the Los Angeles area. Science 302(5652):1946–1949, doi:10.1126/science.1090747
Aochi H, Douglas J (2006) Testing the validity of simulated strong ground motion from the dynamic rupture of a finite fault, by using empirical equations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4(3):211–229, doi:10.1007/s10518-006-0001-3
Aochi H, Fukuyama E (2002) Three-dimensional nonplanar simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake. J Geophys Res 107(B2). doi:10.1029/2000JB000061
Aochi H, Madariaga R (2003) The 1999 Izmit, Turkey, earthquake: Nonplanar fault structure, dynamic rupture process, and strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(3):1249–1266
Aochi H, Cushing M, Scotti O, Berge-Thierry C (2006) Estimating rupture scenario likelihood based on dynamic rupture simulations: The example of the segmented Middle Durance fault, southeastern France. Geophysical Journal International 165(2):436–446, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02842.x
Aoi S, Fujiwara H (1999) 3D finite-difference method using discontinuous grids. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89(4):918–930
Apsel RJ, Luco JE (1983) On the Green’s functions for a layered half-space. Part II. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 73(4):931–951
Archuleta RJ, Brune JN (1975) Surface strong motion associated with a stick-slip event in a foam rubber model of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65(5):1059–1071
Atkinson GM (2001) An alternative to stochastic ground-motion relations for use in seismic hazard analysis in eastern North America. Seismological Research Letters 72:299–306
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(6):2181–2205. doi:10.1785/0120050245
Atkinson GM, Silva W (2000) Stochastic modeling of California ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(2):255–274
Atkinson GM, Somerville PG (1994) Calibration of time history simulation methods. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 84(2):400–414
Atkinson GM, Sonley E (2000) Empirical relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(2):537–544
Baker JW, Cornell CA (2006) Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35(9):1077–1095, doi:10.1002/eqe.571
Bao HS, Bielak J, Ghattas O, Kallivokas LF, O’Hallaron DR, Shewchuk JR, Xu JF (1998) Large-scale simulation of elastic wave propagation in heterogeneous media on parallel computers. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 152(1–2):85–102
Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89(2):501–520
Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1998) FINSIM: A FORTRAN program for simulating stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults. Seismological Research Letters 69:27–32
Berge C, Gariel JC, Bernard P (1998) A very broad-band stochastic source model used for near source strong motion prediction. Geophysical Research Letters 25(7):1063–1066
Beyer K, Bommer JJ (2007) Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bi-directional loading: A review of current practice and code provisions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 11(S1):13–45, doi:10.1080/13632460701280013
Bommer JJ, Acevedo AB (2004) The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8(Special issue 1):43–91
Bommer JJ, Alarcón JE (2006) The prediction and use of peak ground velocity. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10(1):1–31
Bommer JJ, Ruggeri C (2002) The specification of acceleration time-histories in seismic design codes. European Earthquake Engineering 16(1):3–17
Bommer JJ, Scott SG, Sarma SK (2000) Hazard-consistent earthquake scenarios. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 19(4):219–231
Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA, Strasser FO, Pecker A, Bard PY, Bungum H, Cotton F, Fäh D, Sabetta F, Scherbaum F, Studer J (2004) The challenge of defining upper bounds on earthquake ground motions. Seismological Research Letters 75(1):82–95
Boore DM (1973) The effect of simple topography on seismic waves: Implications for the accelerations recorded at Pacoima Dam, San Fernando valley, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 63(5):1603–1609
Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 73(6):1865–1894
Boore DM (2001) Comparisons of ground motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake with empirical predictions largely based on data from California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 91(5):1212–1217
Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure and Applied Geophysics 160(3–4):635–676, doi:10.1007/PL00012553
Boore DM (2005) SMSIM—Fortran programs for simulating ground motions from earthquakes: Version 2.3—A revision of OFR 96-80-A. Open-File Report 00-509, United States Geological Survey, modified version, describing the program as of 15 August 2005 (Version 2.30)
Bouchon M (1981) A simple method to calculate Green’s functions for elastic layered media. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 71(4):959–971
Bouchon M, Sánchez-Sesma FJ (2007) Boundary integral equations and boundary elements methods in elastodynamics. In: Advances in Geophysics: advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous Earth, vol 48, Chap 3. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 157–189
Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research 75(26):4997–5009
Brune JN (1971) Correction. Journal of Geophysical Research 76(20):5002
Bycroft GN (1960) White noise representation of earthquake. Journal of The Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 86(EM2):1–16
Campbell KW (1986) An empirical estimate of near-source ground motion for a major, m b = 6.8, earthquake in the eastern United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 76(1):1–17
Campbell KW (2002) A contemporary guide to strong-motion attenuation relations. In: Lee WHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, Chap 60. Academic Press, London
Campbell KW (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(3):1012–1033
Campbell KW (2007) Validation and update of hybrid empirical ground motion (attenuation) relations for the CEUS. Tech. rep., ABS Consulting, Inc. (EQECAT), Beaverton, USA, Award number: 05HQGR0032
Cancani A (1904) Sur l’emploi d’une double échelle sismique des intensités, empirique et absolue. Gerlands Beitr z Geophys 2:281–283, not seen. Cited in Gutenberg and Richter (1942)
Chaljub E, Komatitsch D, Vilotte JP, Capdeville Y, Valette B, Festa G (2007a) Spectral-element analysis in seismology. In: Advances in geophysics: advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous earth, vol 48, chap 7. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 365–419
Chaljub E, Tsuno S, Bard PY, Cornou C (2007b) Analyse des résultats d’un benchmark numérique de prédiction du mouvement sismique dans la vallée de Grenoble. In: 7ème Colloque National AFPS 2007, in French
Chen XF (2007) Generation and propagation of seismic SH waves in multi-layered media with irregular interfaces. In: Advances in geophysics: advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous earth, vol 48, chap 4. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 191–264
Chen M, Hjörleifsdóttir V, Kientz S, Komatitsch D, Liu Q, Maggi A, Savage B, Strand L, Tape C, Tromp J (2008) SPECFEM 3D: User manual version 1.4.3. Tech. rep., Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics (CIG), California Institute of Technology (USA); University of Pau (France). URL: http://www.gps.caltech.edu/jtromp/research/downloads.html
Cotton F, Scherbaum F, Bommer JJ, Bungum H (2006) Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target regions: Application to central Europe and rock sites. Journal of Seismology 10(2):137–156, DOI: 10.1007/s10950-005-9006-7
Dalguer LA, Irikura K, Riera JD (2003) Simulation of tensile crack generation by three-dimensional dynamic shear rupture propagation during an earthquake. J Geophys Res 108(B3), article 2144
Dan K, Watanabe T, Tanaka T, Sato R (1990) Stability of earthquake ground motion synthesized by using different small-event records as empirical Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 80(6):1433–1455
Day SM, Bradley CR (2001) Memory-efficient simulation of anelastic wave propagation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 91(3):520–531
Day SM, Bielak J, Dreger D, Graves R, Larsen S, Olsen KB, Pitarka A (2005) Tests of 3D elastodynamic codes. Final report for Lifelines Project 1A03. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, USA
Dormy E, Tarantola A (1995) Numerical simulation of elastic wave propagation using a finite volume method. Journal of Geophysical Research 100(B2):2123–2133
Douglas J (2003) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: A review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth-Science Reviews 61(1–2):43–104
Douglas J (2007) On the regional dependence of earthquake response spectra. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 44(1):71–99
Douglas J, Suhadolc P, Costa G (2004) On the incorporation of the effect of crustal structure into empirical strong ground motion estimation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2(1):75–99
Douglas J, Bungum H, Scherbaum F (2006) Ground-motion prediction equations for southern Spain and southern Norway obtained using the composite model perspective. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10(1):33–72
Dowrick DJ (1977) Earthquake resistant design—a manual for engineers and architects. Wiley, London
Erdik M, Durukal E (2003) Simulation modeling of strong ground motion. In: Earthquake engineering handbook, chap 6, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA
Esteva L, Rosenblueth E (1964) Espectros de temblores a distancias moderadas y grandes. Boletin Sociedad Mexicana de Ingenieria Sesmica 2:1–18, in Spanish
Faccioli E, Maggio F, Paolucci R, Quarteroni A (1997) 2D and 3D elastic wave propagation by a pseudo-spectral domain decomposition method. Journal of Seismology 1(3):237–251
Field EH, Jordan TH, Cornell CA (2003) OpenSHA: A developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis. Seismological Research Letters 74(4):406–419
Florsch N, Fäh D, Suhadolc P, Panza GF (1991) Complete synthetic seismograms for high-frequency multimode SH-waves. Pure and Applied Geophysics 136:529–560
Frankel A (1995) Simulating strong motions of large earthquakes using recordings of small earthquakes: The Loma Prieta mainshock as a test case. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85(4):1144–1160
Frankel A, Clayton RW (1986) Finite-difference simulations of seismic scattering—Implications for the propagation of short-period seismic-waves in the crust and models of crustal heterogeneity. Journal of Geophysical Research 91(B6):6465–6489
Gallovič F, Brokešová J (2007) Hybrid k-squared source model for strong ground motion simulations: Introduction. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 160(1):34–50, DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2006.09.002
Goda K, Hong HP (2008) Spatial correlation of peak ground motions and response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98(1):354–365, doi:10.1785/0120070078
Graves RWJ (1996) Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 86(4):1091–1106
Guatteri M, Mai PM, Beroza GC, Boatwright J (2003) Strong ground motion prediction from stochastic-dynamic source models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(1):301–313, DOI: 10.1785/0120020006
Guatteri M, Mai PM, Beroza GC (2004) A pseudo-dynamic approximation to dynamic rupture models for strong ground motion prediction. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94(6):2051–2063, DOI: 10.1785/0120040037
Gusev AA (1983) Descriptive statistical model of earthquake source radiation and its application to an estimation of short-period strong motion. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 74:787–808
Gutenberg G, Richter CF (1942) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 32(3):163–191
Guzman RA, Jennings PC (1976) Design spectra for nuclear power plants. Journal of The Power Division, ASCE 102(2):165–178
Hadley DM, Helmberger DV (1980) Simulation of strong ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 70(2):617–630
Hancock J, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA, Bommer JJ, Markatis A, McCoy E, Mendis R (2006) An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10(Special issue 1):67–89
Hancock J, Bommer JJ, Stafford PJ (2008) Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics DOI: 10.1002/eqe.827, in press
Hanks TC (1979) b values and ω−γ seismic source models: Implications for tectonic stress variations along active crustal fault zones and the estimation of high-frequency strong ground motion. Journal of Geophysical Research 84(B5):2235–2242
Hanks TC, McGuire RK (1981) The character of high-frequency strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 71(6):2071–2095
Hartzell SH (1978) Earthquake aftershocks as Green’s functions. Geophysical Research Letters 5(1):1–4
Hartzell S, Leeds A, Frankel A, Williams RA, Odum J, Stephenson W, Silva S (2002) Simulation of broadband ground motion including nonlinear soil effects for a magnitude 6.5 earthquake on the Seattle fault, Seattle, Washington. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92(2):831–853
Haskell NA (1969) Elastic displacements in the near-field of a propagating fault. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 59(2):865–908
Hays WW (1980) Procedures for estimating earthquake ground motions. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1114, US Geological Survey
Heaton TH, Helmberger DV (1977) A study of the strong ground motion of the Borrego Mountain, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 67(2):315–330
Herrero A, Bernard P (1994) A kinematic self-similar rupture process for earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 84(4):1216–1228
Hershberger J (1956) A comparison of earthquake accelerations with intensity ratings. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 46(4):317–320
Heuze F, Archuleta R, Bonilla F, Day S, Doroudian M, Elgamal A, Gonzales S, Hoehler M, Lai T, Lavallee D, Lawrence B, Liu PC, Martin A, Matesic L, Minster B, Mellors R, Oglesby D, Park S, Riemer M, Steidl J, Vernon F, Vucetic M, Wagoner J, Yang Z (2004) Estimating site-specific strong earthquake motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24(3):199–223, DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.11.002
Hisada Y (2008) Broadband strong motion simulation in layered half-space using stochastic Green’s function technique. Journal of Seismology 12(2):265–279, DOI:10.1007/s10950-008-9090-6
Housner GW (1947) Characteristics of strong-motion earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 37(1):19–31
Housner GW (1955) Properties of strong-ground motion earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 45(3):197–218
Housner GW, Jennings PC (1964) Generation of artificial earthquakes. Journal of The Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 90:113–150
Irikura K, Kamae K (1994) Estimation of strong ground motion in broad-frequency band based on a seismic source scaling model and an empirical Green’s function technique. Annali di Geofisica XXXVII(6):1721–1743
Jennings PC, Housner GW, Tsai NC (1968) Simulated earthquake motions. Tech. rep., Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
Joyner WB (1984) A scaling law for the spectra of large earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 74(4):1167–1188
Joyner WB, Boore DM (1986) On simulating large earthquake by Green’s function addition of smaller earthquakes. In: Das S, Boatwright J, Scholtz CH (eds) Earthquake source mechanics, Maurice Ewing Series 6, vol 37. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., USA
Joyner WB, Boore DM (1988) Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of earthquake engineering & soil dynamics II, Geotechnical division, ASCE, pp 43–102
Jurkevics A, Ulrych TJ (1978) Representing and simulating strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 68(3):781–801
Kaka SI, Atkinson GM (2004) Relationships between instrumental ground-motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94(5):1728–1736
Kamae K, Irikura K, Pitarka A (1998) A technique for simulating strong ground motion using hybrid Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88(2):357–367
Kanamori H (1979) A semi-empirical approach to prediction of long-period ground motions from great earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 69(6):1645–1670
Käser M, Iske A (2005) ADER schemes on adaptive triangular meshes for scalar conservations laws. Journal of Computational Physics 205(2):486–508
Kaul MK (1978) Spectrum-consistent time-history generation. Journal of The Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 104(ME4):781–788
Kennett BLN, Kerry NJ (1979) Seismic waves in a stratified half-space. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 57:557–583
Kohrs-Sansorny C, Courboulex F, Bour M, Deschamps A (2005) A two-stage method for ground-motion simulation using stochastic summation of small earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(4):1387–1400, DOI: 10.1785/0120040211
Koketsu K (1985) The extended reflectivity method for synthetic near-field seismograms. Journal of the Physics of the Earth 33:121–131
Komatitsch D, Martin R (2007) An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics 72(5):SM155–SM167
Komatitsch D, Tromp J (1999) Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation. Geophysical Journal International 139(3):806–822
Komatitsch D, Vilotte JP (1998) The spectral element method: An efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88(2):368–392
Komatitsch D, Liu Q, Tromp J, Süss P, Stidham C, Shaw JH (2004) Simulations of ground motion in the Los Angeles basin based upon the spectral-element method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94(1):187–206
Kristeková M, Kristek J, Moczo P, Day SM (2006) Misfit criteria for quantitative comparison of seismograms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(5):1836–1850, DOI: 10.1785/0120060012
Lee VW, Trifunac MD (1985) Torsional accelerograms. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 4(3):132–139
Lee VW, Trifunac MD (1987) Rocking strong earthquake accelerations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 6(2):75–89
Lee Y, Anderson JG, Zeng Y (2000) Evaluation of empirical ground-motion relations in southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(6B):S136–S148
Levander AR (1988) Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics 53(11):1425–1436
LeVeque RJ (2002) Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Luco JE, Apsel RJ (1983) On the Green’s functions for a layered half-space. Part I. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 73(4):909–929
Lysmer J, Drake LA (1972) A finite element method for seismology. In: Bolt BA (eds) Methods in Computational Physics. Academic Press Inc., New York, USA
Ma S, Archuleta RJ, Page MT (2007) Effects of large-scale surface topography on ground motions as demonstrated by a study of the San Gabriel Mountains, Los Angeles, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 97(6):2066–2079, DOI: 10.1785/0120070040
Mai PM, Beroza GC (2003) A hybrid method for calculating near-source, broadband seismograms: Application to strong motion prediction. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 137(1–4):183–199, DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00014-1
Maupin V (2007) Introduction to mode coupling methods for surface waves. In: Advances in geophysics: advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous earth, vol 48, chap 2. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 127–155
McGuire RK (2004) Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, California, USA
Miyake H, Iwata T, Irikura K (2003) Source characterization for broadband ground-motion simulation: Kinematic heterogeneous source model and strong motion generation area. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(6):2531–2545, DOI: 10.1785/0120020183
Moczo P, Kristek J, Galis M, Pazak P, Balazovjech M (2007a) The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion. Acta Physica Slovaca 57(2):177–406
Moczo P, Robertsson JOA, Eisner L (2007b) The finite-difference time-domain method for modeling of seismic wave propagation. In: Advances in geophysics: advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous Earth, vol 48, chap 8. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 421–516
Montaldo V, Kiremidjian AS, Thráinsson H, Zonno G (2003) Simulation of the Fourier phase spectrum for the generation of synthetic accelerograms. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 7(3):427–445
Mora P, Place D (1994) Simulation of the frictional stick-slip instability. Pure and Applied Geophysics 143(1–3):61–87
Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(3):995–1010, DOI: 10.1785/0120030207
Mukherjee S, Gupta VK (2002) Wavelet-based generation of spectrum-compatible time-histories. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22(9–12):799–804
Murphy JR, O’Brien LJ (1977) The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 67(3):877–915
Naeim F, Lew M (1995) On the use of design spectrum compatible time histories. Earthquake Spectra 11(1):111–127
Nau RF, Oliver RM, Pister KS (1982) Simulating and analyzing artificial nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72(2):615–636
Ólafsson S, Sigbjörnsson R (1995) Application of ARMA models to estimate earthquake ground motion and structural response. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 24(7):951–966
Ólafsson S, Remseth S, Sigbjörnsson R (2001) Stochastic models for simulation of strong ground motion in Iceland. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 30(9):1305–1331
Olsen K, Madariaga R, Archuleta RJ (1997) Three-dimensional dynamic simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake. Science 278:834–838
Olsen KB, Day SM, Minster JB, Cui Y, Chourasia A, Faerman M, Moore R, Maechling P, Jordan T (2006) Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 33(L07305). doi:10.1029/2005GL025472
Oprsal I, Zahradnik J (2002) Three-dimensional finite difference method and hybrid modeling of earthquake ground motion. J Geophys Res 107(B8). doi:10.1029/2000JB000082
Ordaz M, Arboleda J, Singh SK (1995) A scheme of random summation of an empirical Green’s function to estimate ground motions from future large earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85(6):1635–1647
Panza GF (1985) Synthetic seismograms: The Rayleigh waves modal summation. Journal of Geophysics 58:125–145
Panza GF, Suhadolc P (1987) Complete strong motion synthetics. In: Bolt BA (eds) Seismic strong motion synthetics. Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 153–204
Papageorgiou AS, Aki K (1983) A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. Part I. Description of the model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 73(3):693–702
Pavic R, Koller MG, Bard PY, Lacave-Lachet C (2000) Ground motion prediction with the empirical Green’s function technique: an assessment of uncertainties and confidence level. Journal of Seismology 4(1):59–77
Pitarka A, Irikura K, Iwata T, Sekiguchi H (1998) Three-dimensional simulation of the near-fault ground motion for the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe), Japan, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88(2):428–440
Pitarka A, Somerville P, Fukushima Y, Uetake T, Irikura K (2000) Simulation of near-fault strong-ground motion using hybrid Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(3):566–586
Place D, Mora P (1999) The lattice solid model to simulate the physics of rocks and earthquakes: Incorporation of friction. Journal of Computational Physics 150(2):332–372
Pousse G, Bonilla LF, Cotton F, Margerin L (2006) Non stationary stochastic simulation of strong ground motion time histories including natural variability: Application to the K-net Japanese database. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(6):2103–2117, DOI: 10.1785/0120050134
Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthquake Spectra 24(1):3–21, DOI: 10.1193/1.2894833
Reiter L (1990) Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights. Columbia University Press, New York
Ripperger J, Mai PM, Ampuero JP (2008) Variability of near-field ground motion from dynamic earthquake rupture simulations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98(3):1207–1228, DOI: 10.1785/0120070076
Ruiz J, Baumont D, Bernard P, , Berge-Thierry C (2007) New approach in the kinematic k 2 source model for generating physical slip velocity functions. Geophysical Journal International 171(2):739–754, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03503.x
Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 86(2):337–352
Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Smit P (2004) On the use of response spectral-reference data for the selection and ranking of ground-motion models for seismic-hazard analysis in regions of moderate seismicity: The case of rock motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94(6):2164–2185, DOI: 10.1785/0120030147
Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Staedtke H (2006) The estimation of minimum-misfit stochastic models from empirical ground-motion prediction equations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(2):427–445, DOI: 10.1785/0120050015
Shi B, Brune JN (2005) Characteristics of near-fault ground motions by dynamic thrust faulting: Two-dimensional lattice particle approaches. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(6):2525–2533, DOI: 10.1785/0120040227
Shinozuka M (1988) Engineering modeling of ground motion. In: Proceedings of ninth world conference on earthquake engineering, vol VIII, pp 51–62
Shome N, Cornell CA, Bazzurro P, Carballo JE (1998) Earthquakes, records and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 14(3):469–500
Silva WJ, Lee K (1987) State-of-the-art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States; report 24: WES RASCAL code for synthesizing earthquake ground motions. Miscellaneous Paper S-73-1, US Army Corps of Engineers
Silva W, Gregor N, Darragh B (1999) Near fault ground motions. Tech. rep., Pacific Engineering and Analysis, El Cerrito, USA, PG & E PEER—Task 5.A
Sokolov V, Wald DJ (2002) Instrumental intensity distribution for the Hector Mine, California, and the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquakes: Comparison of two methods. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92(6):2145–2162
Souriau A (2006) Quantifying felt events: A joint analysis of intensities, accelerations and dominant frequencies. Journal of Seismology 10(1):23–38, DOI: 10.1007/s10950-006-2843-1
Spudich P, Xu L (2003) Software for calculating earthquake ground motions from finite faults in vertically varying media. In: IASPEI handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, chap 85.14. Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 1633–1634
Spudich P, Joyner WB, Lindh AG, Boore DM, Margaris BM, Fletcher JB (1999) SEA99: A revised ground motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89(5):1156–1170
Strasser FO, Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA (2008) Truncation of the distribution of ground-motion residuals. Journal of Seismology 12(1):79–105, DOI: 10.1007/s10950-007-9073-z
Swanger HJ, Boore DM (1978) Simulation of strong-motion displacements using surface-wave modal superposition. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 68(4):907–922
Takeo M (1985) Near-field synthetic seismograms taking into account the effects of anelasticity: The effects of anelastic attenuation on seismograms caused by a sedimentary layer. Meteorology & Geophysics 36(4):245–257
Tavakoli B, Pezeshk S (2005) Empirical-stochastic ground-motion prediction for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(6):2283–2296, DOI: 10.1785/0120050030
Tinti E, Fukuyama E, Piatanesi A, Cocco M (2005) A kinematic source-time function compatible with earthquake dynamics. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(4):1211–1223, DOI: 10.1785/0120040177
Trifunac MD (1971) A method for synthesizing realistic strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 61(6):1739–1753
Trifunac MD (1976) Preliminary analysis of the peaks of strong earthquake ground motion – dependence of peaks on earthquake magnitude, epicentral distance, and recording site conditions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 66(1):189–219
Trifunac MD (1990) Curvograms of strong ground motion. Journal of The Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 116:1426–32
Trifunac MD (2007) Recording strong earthquake motion—instruments, recording strategies and data processing. Tech. Rep. CE 07-03. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California
Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975) On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65(1):139–162
Tufte ER (2006) Beautiful Evidence. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, USA
Tumarkin A, Archuleta R (1994) Empirical ground motion prediction. Annali di Geofisica XXXVII(6):1691–1720
Vanmarcke EH (1979) Representation of earthquake ground motion: Scaled accelerograms and equivalent response spectra. State-of-the-Art for Assessing Earthquake Hazards in the United States 14, Miscellaneous Paper S-73-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA
Vanmarcke EH, Gasparini DA (1976) Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra. Tech. Rep. R76-4. Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, USA
Virieux J, Madariaga R (1982) Dynamic faulting studied by a finite difference method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72(2):345–369
Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999) Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra 15(3):557–564
Wang R (1999) A simple orthonormalization method for stable and efficient computation of Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89(3):733–741
Wang GQ, Boore DM, Tang G, Zhou X (2007) Comparisons of ground motions from collocated and closely-spaced 1-sample-per-second Global Positioning System (GPS) and accelerograph recordings of the 2003, M6.5 San Simeon, California, earthquake in the Parkfield Region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(1B):76–90. doi:10.1785/0120060053
Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson N (2006) Selection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 26(5):477–482
Wennerberg L (1990) Stochastic summation of empirical Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 80(6):1418–1432
Wong HL, Trifunac MD (1978) Synthesizing realistic ground motion accelerograms. Tech. Rep. CE 78-07. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California
Woodhouse JH (1974) Surface waves in a laterally varying layered structure. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 37:461–490
Zeng Y, Anderson JG (1995) A method for direct computation of the differential seismogram with respect to the velocity change in a layered elastic solid. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85(1):300–307
Zeng T, Anderson JG, Yu G (1994) A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions. Geophysical Research Letters 21(8):725–728
Acknowledgements
The design of the diagram in this article has benefited from advice contained in the book by Tufte (2006). Some of the work presented in this article was funded by the ANR project ‘Quantitative Seismic Hazard Assessment’ (QSHA). The rest was funded by internal BRGM research projects. We thank the rest of the BRGM Seismic Risks unit for numerous discussions on the topics discussed in this article. Finally, we thank two anonymous reviewers for their careful and detailed reviews, which led to significant improvements to this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Douglas, J., Aochi, H. A Survey of Techniques for Predicting Earthquake Ground Motions for Engineering Purposes. Surv Geophys 29, 187–220 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y