Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of in-water recompression with oxygen to 6 msw versus normobaric oxygen breathing on bubble formation in divers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally accepted that the incidence of decompression sickness (DCS) from hyperbaric exposures is low when few or no bubbles are present in the circulation. To date, no data are available on the influence of in-water oxygen breathing on bubble formation following a provocative dive in man. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of post-dive hyperbaric versus normobaric oxygen breathing (NOB) on venous circulating bubbles. Nineteen divers carried out open-sea field air dives at 30 msw depth for 30 min followed by a 9 min stop at 3 msw. Each diver performed three dives: one control dive, and two dives followed by 30 min of hyperbaric oxygen breathing (HOB) or NOB; both HOB and NOB started 10 min after surfacing. For HOB, divers were recompressed in-water to 6 msw at rest, whereas NOB was performed in a dry room in supine position. Decompression bubbles were examined by a precordial pulsed Doppler. Bubble count was significantly lower for post-dive NOB than for control dives. HOB dramatically suppressed circulating bubble formation with a bubble count significantly lower than for NOB or controls. In-water recompression with oxygen to 6 msw is more effective in removing gas bubbles than NOB. This treatment could be used in situations of “interrupted” or “omitted” decompression, where a diver returns to the water in order to complete decompression prior to the onset of symptoms. Further investigations are needed before to recommend this protocol as an emergency treatment for DCS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aharon-Peretz J, Adir Y, Gordon CR, Kol S, Gal N, Melamed Y (1993) Spinal cord decompression sickness in sport diving. Arch Neurol 50:753–756

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson D, Nagasawa G, Norfleet W, Olszowka A, Lundgren C (1991) O2 pressures between 0.12 and 2.5 atm abs, circulatory function, and N2 elimination. Undersea Biomed Res 18(4):279–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ball R (1993) Effect of severity, time to recompression with oxygen, and re-treatment on outcome in forty-nine cases of spinal cord decompression sickness. Undersea Hyperb Med 20(2):133–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balldin UI (1973) Effects of ambient temperature and body position on tissue nitrogen elimination in man. Aerosp Med 44:365–370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balldin UI, Lundgren CEG (1972) Effects of immersion with the head above the water on tissue nitrogen elimination in man. Aerosp Med 43:1101–1108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bert P (1878) La Pression barométrique. Recherches de physiologie expérimentale, Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatteau JE, Souraud JB, Gempp E, Boussuges A (2006a) Gas nuclei, their origin, and their role in bubble formation. Aviat Space Environ Med 77:1068–1076

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blatteau JE, Jean F, Pontier JM, Blanche E, Bompar JM, Meaudre E, Etienne JL (2006) Decompression sickness accident management in remote areas. Use of immediate in-water recompression therapy. Review and elaboration of a new protocol targeted for a mission at Clipperton atoll. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 25(8):874–883. doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2006.04.007

  • Brubakk A (2004) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: oxygen and bubbles. Undersea Hyperb Med 31(1):73–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds C (1999) Australian underwater oxygen treatment of DCS. In: Key E and Spencer MP (eds) In-water recompression. Proceedings for the 48th workshop of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, pp 2–15

  • Francis TJR, Mitchell SJ (2003) Pathophysiology of decompression sickness. In: Brubbak AO, Neuman TS (eds) The Bennett and Elliot’s physiology and medicine of diving, 5th edn. WB Saunders, London, pp 530–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon RE, Gorman DF (2003) Treatment of the decompression disorders. In: Brubbak AO, Neuman TS (eds) The Bennett and Elliot’s physiology and medicine of diving, 5th edn. WB Saunders, London, pp 600–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishi RY, Brubakk AO, Eftedal OS (2003) Bubble detection. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS (eds) Bennett and Elliot’s physiology and medicine of diving, 5th edn. WB Saunders, London, pp 501–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Nossum V, Koteng S, Brubakk A (1999) Endothelial damage by bubbles in the pulmonary artery of the pig. Undersea Hyperb Med 26(1):1–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nossum V, Hjelde A, Brubakk A (2002) Small amounts of venous gas embolism cause delayed impairment of endothelial function and increase polymorphonuclear neutrophil inflammation. Eur J Appl Physiol 86:209–214. doi:10.1007/s00421-001-0531-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pyle RL (1999). Keeping up with the times: application of technical diving practices for in-water recompression. In: Key E, Spencer MP (eds) In-water recompression. Proceedings for the 48th workshop of the undersea and hyperbaric medical society, pp 74–88

  • Ross JAS, Trevett AJ, Forbes RF, Rae CK, Sheehan C (2004) The treatment of decompression illness arising from diving around the Orkeny islands October 1991–June 2003. Undersea Hyperb Med 31(3):354

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer MP (1976) Decompression limits for compressed air determined by ultrasonically detected blood bubbles. J Appl Physiol 40:229–235

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stipp W (2004) The influence of time to hyperbaric oxygen treatment on the outcome of neurological decompression illness in divers. Undersea Hyperb Med 31(3):353

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollerlokken A, Nossum V, Hovin W, Gennser M, Brubakk A (2007) Recompression with oxygen to 160 kPa eliminates vascular bubbles, but does not prevent endothelium damage. Eur J Underwater Hyperbaric Med 8(1, 2):11–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There is no financial or other relationship that might be perceived as leading to a conflict of interest (i.e., affecting author’s objectivity).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Eric Blatteau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blatteau, JE., Pontier, JM. Effect of in-water recompression with oxygen to 6 msw versus normobaric oxygen breathing on bubble formation in divers. Eur J Appl Physiol 106, 691–695 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1065-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1065-y

Keywords

Navigation