Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral audiogram of two Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus)

  • Short Note
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With increased polar anthropogenic activity, such as from the oil and gas industry, there are growing concerns about how Arctic species will be affected. Knowledge of species’ sensory abilities, such as auditory sensitivities, can be used to mitigate the effects of such activities. Herein, behavioral audiograms of two captive adult Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) were measured using a yes/no paradigm and descending staircase method of signal presentation. Both foxes displayed a typical mammalian U-shaped audiometric curve, with a functional hearing range of 125 Hz–16 kHz (sensitivity ≤ 60 dB re: 20 μPa) and average peak sensitivity of 24 dB re: 20 μPa at 4 kHz. The foxes had a lower frequency range and sensitivity than would be expected when compared to previous audiograms of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and other carnivores. These differences indicate Arctic foxes (V. lagopus) may have a lower frequency range than previously expected, which was similar to the only other fox species tested to date, kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis). Alternatively, differences may be due to testing constraints, such as masking of test signals by ambient noise and/or an unintentionally trained conservative response bias, which most likely resulted in underestimated hearing curves. While results of this study should be interpreted with caution due to its limitations, findings indicate that foxes have a narrower frequency range than formerly presumed. Anthropogenic activities near fox habitats can mitigate their impacts by reducing noise at frequencies within the functional hearing range and peak sensitivities of this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Blackwell SB, Lawson JW, Williams MT (2004) Tolerance by ringed seals (Phoca hispida) to impact pipe-driving and construction sounds at an oil production island. J Acoust Soc Am 115:2346–2357. doi:10.1121/1.1701899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles AE, Francine JK (1993) Effects of simulated aircraft noise on hearing, food detection, and predator avoidance behavior of the kit fox, Vulpes macrotis. J Acoust Soc Am 93:2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay RR (1988) Hearing in vertebrates: a psychophysics databook. Hill-Fay Associates, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellerman LW (1933) Chance orders of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments. J Genet Psychol 42:206–208. doi:10.1080/08856559.1933.10534237

    Google Scholar 

  • Green D, Swets J (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffner HE (1983) Hearing in large and small dogs: absolute thresholds and size of the tympanic membrane. Behav Neurosci 97:310–318. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.97.2.310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner RS, Heffner HE (1982) Hearing in the elephant (Elephas maximus): absolute sensitivity, frequency discrimination, and sound localization. J Comp physiol Psychol 96:926–944. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.96.6.926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner RS, Heffner HE (1985) Hearing range of the domestic cat. Hear Res 19:85–88. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(85)90100-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JB, Kavanagh GC, Dalton JCM (1986) Hearing in the ferret (Mustela putorius): thresholds for pure tone detection. Hear Res 24(3):269–275. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(86)90025-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schusterman R (1974) Low false-alarm rates in signal detection by marine mammals. J Acoust Soc Am 55:845–848. doi:10.1121/1.1914610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC (1980) The evolution of hearing in the mammals. In: Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative studies of hearing in vertebrates. Springer, New York, pp 421–436

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tremel DP, Thomas JA, Ramirez KT, Dye JS, Bachman WA, Orban AN, Grimm KK (1998) Underwater hearing sensitivity of a Pacific white-sided dolphin, Lagenorhynchus obliquidens. Aquat Mamm 24:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J, Armstrong K (2010) Managing environmental and social risks in international oil and gas projects: perspectives on compliance. J World Energy Law Bus 3:140–165. doi:10.1093/jwelb/jwq002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted as a master’s thesis at Western Illinois University. The Department of Biological Sciences at Western Illinois University (WIU) contributed all of the test equipment. The study was partially funded by a student grant from the WIU Graduate School. Food and animal costs were donated by the zoos. The critiques by Dr. Brian Peer and Dr. Jeff Engel and by external reviewers, especially Jack Terhune, were invaluable to producing this publication. The authors thank Laura Monaco Torelli and Tara Gifford for advising training procedures, and Marc Silpa, Nicole Spinoza, Kirk Massey, and the keepers of the Columbus Zoo for volunteering time and making this research possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda L. Stansbury.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 51 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 159 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stansbury, A.L., Thomas, J.A., Stalf, C.E. et al. Behavioral audiogram of two Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus). Polar Biol 37, 417–422 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-014-1446-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-014-1446-5

Keywords

Navigation