Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical long-term outcome, technical success, and cost analysis of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of osteoblastomas and spinal osteoid osteomas in comparison to open surgical resection

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the clinical success and costs of computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of osteoblastoma (OB) and spinal osteoid osteoma (OO).

Materials and methods

Nineteen patients with OB and eight patients with spinal OO were treated with CT-guided RFA. The OBs were localized in the extremities (n = 10), the vertebral column (n = 2), and (juxta-)articular (n = 7). Dedicated procedural techniques included three-dimensional CT-guided access planning in all cases, overlapping RFA needle positions (median, two positions; range, 1–6 RF-electrode positions) within the OB nidus (multiple ablation technique, n = 15), and thermal protection in case of adjacent neural structure in four spinal OO. The data of eight operated OB and ten operated spinal OO patients were used for comparison. Long-term success was assessed by clinical examination and using a questionnaire sent to all operated and RFA-treated patients including visual analogue scales (VAS) regarding the effect of RFA on severity of pain and limitations of daily activities (0–10, with 0 = no pain/limitation up to 10 = maximum or most imaginable pain/limitation).

Results

All patients had a clear and persistent pain reduction until the end of follow-up. The mean VAS score for all spinal OO patients and all OB patients treated either with RFA or with surgical excision significantly decreased for severity of pain at night, severity of pain during the day, and both for limitations of daily and of sports activities.

Conclusions

RFA is an efficient method for treating OB and spinal OO and should be regarded as the first-line therapy after interdisciplinary individual case discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gangi A, Alizadeh H, Wong L, Buy X, Dietemann JL, Roy C. Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous laser ablation and follow-up in 114 patients. Radiology. 2007;242:293–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Motamedi D, Learch TJ, Ishimitsu DN, et al. Thermal ablation of osteoid osteoma: overview and step-by-step guide. Radiographics. 2009;29:2127–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pourfeizi HH, Tabrizi A, Bazavar M, Sales JG. Clinical findings and results of surgical resection of thoracolumbar osteoid osteoma. Asian Spine J. 2014;8:150–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lucas DR. Osteoblastoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:1460–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Papaioannou G, Sebire NJ, McHugh K. Imaging of the unusual pediatric ‘blastomas’. Cancer Imaging. 2009;9:1–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Orguc S, Arkun R. Primary tumors of the spine. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18:280–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mungo DV, Zhang X, O’Keefe RJ, Rosier RN, Puzas JE, Schwarz EM. COX-1 and COX-2 expression in osteoid osteomas. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:159–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zileli M, Cagli S, Basdemir G, Ersahin Y. Osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas of the spine. Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15(5):E5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boriani S, Amendola L, Bandiera S, et al. Staging and treatment of osteoblastoma in the mobile spine: a review of 51 cases. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:2003–10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gasbarrini A, Cappuccio M, Bandiera S, Amendola L, van Urk P, Boriani S. Osteoid osteoma of the mobile spine: surgical outcomes in 81 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:2089–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Omlor GW, Lehner B, Wiedenhöfer B, Deininger C, Weber MA, Rehnitz C. Radiofrequency ablation in spinal osteoid osteoma. Options and limits. Orthopade. 2012;41:618–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Z, Zhao Y, Hou S, Mao N, Yu S, Hou T. Clinical features and surgical management of spinal osteoblastoma: a retrospective study in 18 cases. PLoS One. 2013;8:e74635. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074635.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rehnitz C, Sprengel SD, Lehner B, et al. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma: clinical success and long-term follow-up in 77 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3426–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rehnitz C, Sprengel SD, Lehner B, et al. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma: correlation of clinical outcome and imaging features. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;19:330–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rimondi E, Mavrogenis AF, Rossi G, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for non-spinal osteoid osteomas in 557 patients. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenthal DI, Hornicek FJ, Torriani M, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous treatment with radiofrequency energy. Radiology. 2003;229:171–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt D, Clasen S, Schaefer JF, et al. CT-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation of osteoid osteoma: clinical long-term results. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2011;183:381–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rybak LD, Gangi A, Buy X, La Rocca VR, Wittig J. Thermal ablation of spinal osteoid osteomas close to neural elements: technical considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:W293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trotta B, Fox MG. Benign osteoid-producing bone lesions: update on imaging and treatment. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2013;17:116–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vanderschueren GM, Taminiau AH, Obermann WR, Bloem JL. Osteoid osteoma: clinical results with thermocoagulation. Radiology. 2002;224:82–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pinto CH, Taminiau AH, Vanderschueren GM, Hogendoorn PC, Bloem JL, Obermann WR. Technical considerations in CT-guided radiofrequency thermal ablation of osteoid osteoma: tricks of the trade. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1633–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shrimpton P. Assessment of patient dose in CT. In: European guidelines for multislice computed tomography funded by the European Commission 2004: contract number FIGMCT2000-20078-CT-TIP. Luxembourg: Luxembourg: European Commission; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Albisinni U, Rimondi E, Malaguti MC, Ciminari R. Radiofrequency thermoablation in the treatment of osteoid osteoma. Radiology. 2004;232:304. author reply 304–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jankharia B, Burute N. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for osteoid osteoma: how we do it. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19:36–42.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bitsch RG, Rupp R, Bernd L, Ludwig K. Osteoid osteoma in an ex vivo animal model: temperature changes in surrounding soft tissue during CT-guided radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2006;238:107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dupuy DE, Hong R, Oliver B, Goldberg SN. Radiofrequency ablation of spinal tumors: temperature distribution in the spinal canal. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1263–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Klass D, Marshall T, Toms A. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of spinal osteoid osteomas with concomitant perineural and epidural irrigation for neuroprotection. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2238–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rimondi E, Bianchi G, Malaguti MC, et al. Radiofrequency thermoablation of primary non-spinal osteoid osteoma: optimization of the procedure. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1393–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Woertler K, Vestring T, Boettner F, Winkelmann W, Heindel W, Lindner N. Osteoid osteoma: CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and follow-up in 47 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:717–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ronkainen J, Blanco Sequeiros R, Tervonen O. Cost comparison of low-field (0.23 T) MRI-guided laser ablation and surgery in the treatment of osteoid osteoma. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2858–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vanderschueren GM, Obermann WR, Dijkstra SP, Taminiau AH, Bloem JL, van Erkel AR. Radiofrequency ablation of spinal osteoid osteoma: clinical outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:901–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Laus M, Albisinni U, Alfonso C, Zappoli FA. Osteoid osteoma of the cervical spine: surgical treatment or percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation? Eur Spine J. 2007;16:2078–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oliveira CR, Mendonça BB, Camargo OP, et al. Classical osteoblastoma, atypical osteoblastoma, and osteosarcoma. A comparative study based on clinical, histological, and biological parameters. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007;62:167–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors very much thank Professor Volker Ewerbeck, Heidelberg, for supporting this work and his fruitful comments. Also, we thank Dr. Wolfram Stiller, Heidelberg, for his help with calculating the radiation exposure of the CT-guided radiofrequency ablation.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc-André Weber.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental Fig. 1

(PDF 576 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weber, MA., Sprengel, S.D., Omlor, G.W. et al. Clinical long-term outcome, technical success, and cost analysis of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of osteoblastomas and spinal osteoid osteomas in comparison to open surgical resection. Skeletal Radiol 44, 981–993 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2139-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2139-z

Keywords

Navigation