Abstract
The critical nature of health care demands high performance levels from medical equipment. To ensure these performance levels are maintained, medical physicists and biomedical engineers conduct a range of measurements on equipment during acceptance testing and on-going quality assurance programs. Wherever there are measurements, there are measurement uncertainties with potential conflicts between the measurements made by installers, owners and occasionally regulators. Prior to 1993, various methods were used to calculate and report measurement uncertainties. In 1993, the International Organization for Standardization published the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). The document was jointly published with six international organizations principally involved in measurements and standards. The GUM is regarded as an international benchmark on how measurement uncertainty should be calculated and reported. Despite the critical nature of these measurements, there has not been widespread use of the GUM by medical physicists and biomedical engineers. This may be due to the complexity of the GUM. Some organisations have published guidance on the GUM tailored to specific measurement disciplines. This paper presents the philosophy behind the GUM, and demonstrates, with a medical physics measurement example, how the GUM recommends uncertainties be calculated and reported.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
South Australian Government,Radiation Protection and Control (Ionising Radiation) Regulations 2000, Government Gazette, 2000.
Craig, A. R., Heggie, J. C. P., McLean, I. D., Coakley, K. S. and Nicoll, J. J.,Recommendations for a mammography quality assurance program, Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 24(3):107–131, 2001.
McCollough, C. H. and Zink, F. E.,Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT scanner, Med. Phys., 26:2223–2230, 1999.
Luketina, I. A., Greig, L.,Linear accelerator output Variability, Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 27(3):155–159, 2004.
Nobels, F., Beckers, F., Bailleul, E., De Schrijver, P., Sierens, L., Van Crombrugge, P.,Feasibility of a quality assurance programme of bedside blood glucose testing in a hospital setting: 7 years' experience, Diabet. Med., 21(12):1288–91, 2004.
International Organization for Standardization,Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1995.
Hinkle, D., Wiersma, W., and Jurs, S.,Applied Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, Houghton Miffin, Boston, 2002.
EURACHEM,Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, Laboratory of the Government Chemist, London, 1995.
International Atomic Energy Agency,Quantifying uncertainty in nuclear analytical measurements, TECDOC 1401, IAEA, Vienna, 2004.
Bentley R. E.,Applying the ISO Guide to the calculation of uncertainty: temperature, National Measurement Laboratory, Sydney, 2001.
Taylor, B. N., Kuyatt, C. E.,Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, 1994.
Bentley R. E.,Uncertainty in measurement: The ISO Guide, 6th ed., National Measurement Laboratory, Sydney, 2003.
Pentz, M., Shott, M.,Handling Experimental Data, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1988.
Kirkup, L.,Experimental methods: an introduction to the analysis and presentation of data, John Wiley & Sons, Milton, 1994.
International Atomic Energy Agency,Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, TRS-398, IAEA, Vienna, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gregory, K., Bibbo, G. & Pattison, J.E. A standard approach to measurement uncertainties for scientists and engineers in medicine. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 28, 131–139 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178705
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178705