Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Osmotherapy for increased intracranial pressure: Comparison between mannitol and glycerol

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Osmotic agents are still the most common treatment for controlling intracranial hypertension (ICH). Mannitol, glycerol, sorbitol, and hypertonic serum saline are the agents currently available.

This work was designed to compare mannitol and glycerol in a similar population of brain injured patients, randomly divided into two groups of eight. The following mean day parameters were obtained: number of infusions, hydric balance, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and intracranial pressure (ICP). Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated. Brain computed tomographies (CT) were obtained on arrival, at follow-up whenever justified and at discharge. For comparison of both groups a modified therapeutic intensity level (mTIL) was used.

Both agents induced a statistically equally effective decrease on ICP and increase on CPP evaluated at one and two hours post infusion but the mean day mTIL showed a statistically significant difference in favour of glycerol. The possible explanations of this difference are discussed. According to our results mannitol would be most indicated as a bolus to control sudden rises in ICP whereas glycerol would be most indicated as a basal treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson P, Borens L, Gordon Eet al (1988) Use of mannitol during neurosurgery: interpatient variability in the plasma and CSF levels. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 35: 643–649

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bullock R, Maxwell WL, Graham DIet al (1991) Glial swelling following human cerebral contusion: an ultrastructural study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54: 427–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bullock R (1995) Mannitol and other diuretics in severe neurotrauma. New Horizons 3: 448–452

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biestro A, Cancela M, Alberti Ret al (1994) Delayed impairment of cerebral perfusion pressure after head injury: role of infection and sepsis. In: Nagai H, Kamiya K, Ishii S (eds) Intracranial pressure IX. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 671–673

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dearden NM, Miller JD (1989) Paired comparison of hypnotic and osmotic therapy in the reduction of intracranial hyperlension after severe head injury. In: Hoff JT, Betz AL (eds) Intracranial pressure VII Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 474–481

    Google Scholar 

  6. Denchev D, Schnitzer M, Mirski Met al (1994) Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure in an experimental awake model of focal cerebral injury: comparison between mannitol and hypertonic saline. In: Nagai H, Kamiya K, Ishii S (eds) Intracranial pressure IX. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 658–659

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frank MS, Nahata MC, Hilty MD (1981) Glycerol: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse reactions and clinical use. Pharmacotherapy 1: 147–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. García Sola R, Pulido P, Capilla P (1991) The immediate and long-term effects of mannitol and glycerol. A comparative experimental study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 109: 114–121

    Google Scholar 

  9. Graham DI, Adams JH, Doyle D (1978) Ischemic brain damage in fatal non-missile head injuries. J Neurol Sci 39: 213–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Graham DI, Ford I, Adams JHet al (1989) Ischaemic brain damage is still common in fatal non-missile head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52: 346–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartwell RC, Sutton LN (1993) Mannitol, intracranial pressure, and vasogenic edema. Neurosurgery 32: 444–450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hruska FE, Buist RJ, Sutherland GRet al (1992) Mannitol does not affect energy metabolism in forebrain ischemia. Neuroreport 3: 897–900

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamezawa T, Asakura T, Yatsushiro Ket al (1994) 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopic study on the effect of glycerol on cold-induced brain edema. Acta Neurochir (Wien) [Suppl] 60: 499–501

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kauffman AM, Cardoso ER (1991) Effects of mannitol treatment on cerebral water content. In: Avezaat CJJ, Van Eijndhoven JHM, Maas AIR, Tans JTJ (eds) Intracranial pressure VII Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 592–595

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klein HJ, Schmidt K (1982) Hyperosmolar solutions and diuretics in the treatment of brain edema. In: Hartmann A, Brock M (eds) Treatment of cerebral edema. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumana CR, Chan GTC, Yu YLet al (1990) Investigation of intravascular haemolysis during treatment of acute stroke. wilh intravenous glycerol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 29: 347–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luvisotto TL, Auer RN, Sutherland GR (1996) The effect of mannitol on experimental cerebral ischemia, revisited. Neurosurgery 38: 131–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyons TP, Riedesel ML (1993) Glycerol-induced hyperhidralion: its effects on fluid comparlments in the ral. Life Sci 53: 1779–1787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marmarou A, Eisenberg HM, Foulkes Met al (1991) NINDS traumatic coma data bank: intracranial pressure monitoring methodology. J Neurosurg 75: S21-S27

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marmarou A, Anderson RL, Ward JDet al (1991) Impacl of ICP inslability and hypolension on oulcome in patients with severe head trauma. Neurosurg 75: S159-S165

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marshall LF, Smith RW, Rauscher LAet al (1978) Mannitol dose requirements in brain-injured patients. J Neurosurg 48: 169–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marshall LF, Eisenberg HM, Jane JAet al (1991) A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 75: S14-S20

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maset AL, Marmarou A, Ward JDet al (1987) Pressure-volume index in head injury. J Neurosurg 67: 832–840

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mc Graw CP, Alexander E, Howard G (1978) Effect of dose and dose schedule on the response of intracranial pressure to mannitol. Surg Neurol 10: 127–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mc Graw CP, Howard G (1983) Effect of mannitol on increased intracranial pressure. Neurosurgery 13: 269–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mc Graw CP (1989) A cerebral perfusion greater than 80 mmHg is more beneficial. In: Hoff JT, Betz AL (eds) Intracranial pressure VII Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 839–841

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meyer JS, Itoh Y, Okamoto Set al (1975) Circulatory and melabolic effect of glycerol infusion in patients with recent cerebral infarction. Circulation 51: 701–712

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller JD (1985) Head injury and brain ischemia. Implications for therapy. Br J Anaesth 57: 120–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Muizelaar JP, Wei EP, Kontos HAet al (1983) Mannitol causes compensatory cerebral vasoconstriction and vasodilalation in response to blood viscosity changes. J Neurosurg 59: 822–828

    Google Scholar 

  30. Muizelaar JP, Wei EP, Kontos HAet al (1984) Letter. J Neurosurg 60: 1114–1115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nau R, Sander D, Klingelhöfer J (1992) Relalionships between dopamine infusions and intracranial hemodynamics in patients with raised intracranial pressure. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 94: 143–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nau R, Prins FJ, Kolenda Het al (1992) Temporary reversal of serum to cerebrospinal fluid glycerol concentration gradient after inlravenous infusion of glycerol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 42: 181–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Node Y, Nakazawa S (1990) Clinical study of mannitol and glycerol on raised intracranial pressure and on their rebound phenomenon. In: Long Det al (ed) Advances in neurology, Vol 52. Raven, New York, pp 359–363

    Google Scholar 

  34. Otsubo K, Katayama Y, Kashiwagi Fet al (1994) Comparison of the effects of glycerol, mannitol, and urea on ischemic hippocampal damage in gerbils. Acta Neurochir (Wien) [Suppl] 60: 321–324

    Google Scholar 

  35. Robertson CS, Goodman JC, Narayan RKet al (1991) The effect of glucose administration on carbohydrate metabolism after head injury. J Neurosurg 74: 43–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rogvi Hansen B, Boysen G (1992) Intravenous glycerol treatment of acute stroke. A statistical review. Cerebrovasc Dis 2: 11–13

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rosner MJ, Coley I (1987) Cerebral perfusion pressure. A hemodynamic mechanism of mannitol and the postmannitol hemogram. Neurosurgery 21: 147–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosner MJ, Rosner SD (1991) Toxic effects of nutritional support in the severely head injured patient. In: Avezaat CJJ, van Eijndhoven JHM, Maas AIR, Tans JTJ (eds) Intracranial pressure VIII. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 686–690

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rosner MJ, Rosner SD (1994) CPP management I: Results. In: Nagai H, Kamiya K, Ishii S (eds) Intracranial pressure IX. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 218–221

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schneider GH, von Berenberg P, Unterberg Aet al (1994) Rebound phenomenon following multiple doses of mannitol? In: Nagai H, Kamiya K, Ishii S (eds) Intracranial pressure IX. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 386–389

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schwartz ML, Tator CH, Rowed DWet al (1984) A prospective randomized comparison of pentobarbital and mannitol. Can J Neurol Sci 11: 434–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shiogai T, Nara Y, Hara Met al (1995) Hemodynamic, metabolic, and neuronal effects of intravenous glycerol or mannitol in patients with severe head injury. J Neurotrauma 12: 401 (Abs. PA 082)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Singer P, Bursztein S, Kirvela Oet al (1992) Hypercaloric glycerol in injured patients. Surgery 112: 509–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Smedema RJ, Gaab MR, Heissler HE (1991) A comparison study between mannitol and glycerol therapy in reducing intracranial pressure. In: Avezaat CJJ, van Eijndhoven JHM, Maas AIR, Tans JTJ (eds) Intracranial pressure VIII. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 605–608

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tourtellotte WW, Reinglass JL, Newkirk TA (1972) Cerebral dehydrating action of glycerol I. Historical aspects with emphasis on the toxicity and intravenous administration. Clin Pharmacol Therap 13: 159–171

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yu YL, Rumana CR, Lauder IJet al (1993) Treatment of acute cortical infarct with inlravenous glycerol. Slroke 24: 1119–1124

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biestro, A., Alberti, R., Galli, R. et al. Osmotherapy for increased intracranial pressure: Comparison between mannitol and glycerol. Acta neurochir 139, 725–733 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420045

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420045

Keywords

Navigation