Skip to main content
Log in

Using neural networks to diagnose cancer

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While artificial brains are in the realm of science fiction, artificial neural networks (ANNs) are scientific facts. An artificial neural network is a computational structure modeled somewhat on the neural structure of the brain; both have many highly interconnected processing elements. These biologically inspired processing elements are taught by feeding examples until the results are acceptable. In the past 5 years, neural networks have become successful in providing meaningful second opinions in clinical diagnosis. In our research, a prototype artificial neural network was trained on numeral ultrasound data of 52 actual cases and then correctly identified renal cell carcinoma from renal cysts and other conditions without diagnostic errors. Our nonlinear artificial neural network was trained on software using the standard backpropagation paradigm on a 80386 microcomputer. Our ANN learned from ultrasound data in 52 cases (17 malignant, 30 cysts, and 5 other) at a Memphis hospital. The trained prototype performed without error on 47 cases which were not in the data used for training. This prototype must be validated by extending this study to more cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wild, J.J., The use of ultrasonic pulses for the measurement of biologic tissues and the detection of tissue density chances.Surgery 27:183, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amendola, M.A., Bree, R., Pollack, H.,et al. Small renal cell carcinomas: Resolving a diagnostic dilemma.Radiology 166(3):637–641, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Talamo, T.S., and Shonnard, J.W., Small renal adenocarcinomas with metastases.J. Urol. 124:132–134, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walter, T.A., Berger, C.S., and Sandberg, A., The cytogenetics of renal tumors. Where do we stand, where do we go?Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 43(1):15–34, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fallon, B., Renal cancer associated with acquired cystic disease of the kidney and chronic renal failure.Semin. Urol. 7(4):228–36, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clayman, R.V., Surya, V., Mill, R.,et al. Pursuit of the renal mass: Is ultrasound enough?Am. J. Med. 77:218–223, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. intec Customer Support Newsletter: December 1989,intec, P.O. Box 27561, Tempe AZ 85285.

  8. Roth, A., Interview with Igor Aleksander.Neural Network News. AIWeek Inc., Atlanta, November 1(3):6, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeRoach, J.N., Neural networks—An artificial intelligence approach to the analysis of clinical data.Austr. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 12(2):100–106, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mathew, B., Norris, D., Hendry, D., and Waddell, G., Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of low back pain and sciatica.Spine 1991, In press.

  11. Bounds, D.G., and Lloyd, P.J., A multilayer perceptron network for the diagnosis of low back pain.Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks Vol. II, 1988, pp. 483–489.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McGregor, M.J., Flores, T.P., and Sternberg, M.J., Prediction of beta-turns in proteins using neural networks.Protein Eng. (England) (7):521–6, 1989.

  13. Holley, L.H., and Karplus, M., Protein secondary structure prediction with a neural network.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86(1):152–156, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bohr, H., Bohr, J., Brunak, S.,et al. Protein secondary structure and homology by neural networks.FEBS (Netherlands) 241:223–8, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qia, N., and Sejnowski, T.J., Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models.J. Mol. Biol. 202(4):865–84, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuperstein, M., Neural model of adaptive hand-eye coordination for single postures.Science 239(4845):1308–11, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elman, J.L., and Zipser, D., Learning the hidden structure of speech.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83(4):1615–26, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mulsant, B.H., A neural network as an approach to clinical diagnosis.MD Comput. 7(1):25–36, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. LeCun, Y., Modèle connexionistes de l'apprentissage: Thèse de doctorat. Universite' de Paris, Paris, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baxt, W.G., Use of an artificial neural network for data analysis in clinical decision-making: The diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion.Neur. Comput. 2:480–489, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weiss, S.M., and Kulikowski, C.A.,Computer Systems That Learn Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto, Calif., 1991, pp. 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hartzberg, J., Stanley, J., and Lawrence, M.,BrainMaker Users' Guide and Reference Manual (fourth edition), Sierra Madre, Calif., California Scientific Software, Sierra Madre, Calif, 1990. Chapter 4: Designing Neural Networks, pp. 79–108.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Daniels, W.W., Hartman, G.W., Witten, D.M., Farrow, G.M., and Kelalis, P.P., Calcified renal masses: a review of ten years experience at the Mayo Clinic.Radiology 103:503–508, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Neurocomputers newsletter. Gallifrey Publishing, Vicksburg, Michigan, 4(4):5, 1990.

  25. Baum, E., and Wilczek, F., Supervised learning of probability distributions by neural networks.Proceedings of the 1987 IEEE Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems—Natural and Synthetic American Institute of Physics, New York, 52–61, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dietz, W., Kiech, E., and Ali, M., Pattern-based fault-diagnosis using neural networks.First International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of AI and Expert Systems University of Tennessee Space Institute, Chattanooga, Tenn., 13–23, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Guha, A., Using small multilayer networks to search real hyperspaces. Neural Networks Supplement.INNS Abstracts 1:337, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L., and PDP Research Group:Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vols. 1, 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nelson, M.M., and Illingworth, W.T.,A Practical Guide to Neural Nets Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wasserman, P.D.,Neural Computing: Theory and Practice Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Simpson, P.K.,Artificial Neural Systems Pergamon Press, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bailey, D., and Thompson, D., How to develop neural-network applications.AI Expert 5(6):38–47, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stanley, J.,Introduction to Neural Networks. California Scientific Software, Sierra Madre, Calif., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Morse, K.G., In an upscale world.Byte 14(8):222–223, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Makhoul, J., Artificial neural networks.Invest. Radiol. 25:748–750, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maclin, P.S., Dempsey, J., Brooks, J. et al. Using neural networks to diagnose cancer. J Med Syst 15, 11–19 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993877

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993877

Keywords

Navigation