Skip to main content
Log in

Periodic shedding and replacement of venomous caudal spines, with special reference to South American freshwater stingrays, Potamotrygon spp.

  • Full paper
  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

The number of venomous caudal spines and their length and position relative to one another were determined in seven species of South American freshwater rays (Potamotrygonidae) and eight marine or euryhaline species of four families from the Caribbean Coast of South and Central America. Most species have two visible spines at certain stages in the shedding-replacement cycle and only one visible spine at other stages (following shedding). If we include the embryological beginnings of the spines before they erupt and become visible, the spine counts of most rays are actually 2 rather than 1 or 2. Since most species apparently follow this pattern, spine counts are of little use in distinguishing between species except in the relatively few that may have only one, or no spines. Eight captive Potamotrygon specimens maintained in simulated tropical temperature conditions over 12 months showed periodic shedding and replacement of spines. The molts were biannual for a given ray but annual for a given spine. They alternated between two spine loci and their cycles were approximately six months out of phase with each other. Recent studies on Dasyatis sabina by others report only one molt per year, with replacement spines forming always posterior to the primary spine rather than alternating between posterior and anterior. Supernumerary spines (counts of more than two, up to five) are also discussed, as are counts of one and zero.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Babel, J.S. 1967. Reproduction, life history, and ecology of the round stingray, Urolophus halleri Cooper. Calif. Dept. Fish & Game, Fish Bull. 137: 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, H.B. & W.C. Schroeder. 1953. Sawfishes, guitarfishes, skates and rays. pp. 1–514. In: J. Tee-Van, C.M. Breder, A.E. Parr, W.C. Schroeder & L.P. Schultz(ed.) Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Mem. Sears Found. mar. Res. Yale University, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capapé C., A. Chadli & R. Prieto, 1976. Les Sélaciens dangereux des ctes tunisiennes. Arch. de l'Inst. Pasteur de Tunis 1976. (1–2): 61–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castello, H.P. & D.R. Yagolkowski. 1969. Potamotrygon castexi n. sp., una nueva especie de raya de agua dulce del Río Paraná. Instituto Latinoamericano de Fisiología y Reproducíon (ILAFIR), Univ. del Salvador, San Miguel, Argentina, Acta Scientífica 6: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castex, M.N. 1963a. Observaciones sobre la raya de río Potamotrygon motoro (Müller y Henle). Hidrobiología 1: 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castex, M.N. 1963b. Una nueva especie de raya fluvial: Potamotrygon pauckei. Notas distintivas. Bol. Acad. Nac. Cienc. 43: 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castex, M.N. 1965. Notas acerca del Potamotrygon hystrix y del Potamotrygon falkneri en la cuenca del Plata. Hidrobiología 1: 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castex, M.N. & H.P. Castello. 1970a. Potamotrygonidae yepezi n. sp. (Chondrichthyes, Potamotrygon), una nueva especie de raya de agua dulce para los ríos venezolanos, Instituto Latinoamericano de Fisiología y Reproducción (ILAFIR), Univ. del Salvador, San Miguel, Argentina Acta Scientífica 8: 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castex, M.N. & H.P. Castello. 1970b. Potamotrygon leopoldi, una nueva especie de raya de agua dulce para el río Xingú, Brasil (Chondrichthyes, Potamotrygonidae), Instituto Latinoamericano de Fisiología y Reproducción (ILAFIR), Univ. del Salvado, San Miguel, Argentina Acta Scientífica 10: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castex, M.N. & I.O. Maciel. 1965. Notas sobre la familia Potamotrygonidae Garman 1913. II. Hallazgo del Potamotrygon brumi Devicenzi y Teague 1942 en aguas de Santa Fe (Argentina). Publicación Técnica 14: 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castex, M.N., I.O. Maciel & G. Martínez Achenbach. 1963. Acerca de la raya fluvial Potamotrygon labradori. Neotrópica 9: 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castex, M.N., J. Meyer & M. Murphy. 1963. Observaciones sobre un lote de Potamotrygon brumi obtenido en aguas santafesinas. pp. 49–52. In: M.N. Castex (ed.) El genero Potamotrygon en el Paraná medio, Anales del Museo Provincial de Ciencias Naturales ‘Florentino Ameghino’ 2: 1–86.

  • Castex, M.N. & F. Suilar. 1965. Observaciones sobre un lote de Potamotrygon magdalenae (Dumeril 1865) (Chondrichthyes, Potamotrygonidae). Physis 25: 239–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castex M.N. & D.R. Yagolkowski. 1970. Notas sobre des especies de raya de agua dulce (Chondrichthyes, Potamotrygonidae). Instituto Latinoamericano de Fisiología y Reproducción (ILAFIR), Univ. del Salvador, San Miguel, Argentina, Acta Scientífica 9: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, R.J. 1910. Observations on the habits and distribution of certain fishes taken on the coast of North Carolina. I. Elasmobranchii. Bull Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 28: 337–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, G. 1971. Los peces del norte de Colombia. Ministerio de Agricultura, Instituto de Desarrollo de Los Recursos Naturales Renovables, Bogotá. 391 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Yépez, A. 1957. Nueva raya para la ciencia: Potamotrygon schroederi n. sp. Bol. Mus. Ciencias Nat. Caracas II-I: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Yépez, A. & V. Espinosa, 1970. Presenta de Himantura schamardae (Werner), en aguas dulces, Instituto Latinoamericano de Fisiología y Reproducción (ILAFIR), Univ. del Salvador, San Miguel, Argentina, Acta Scientífica 8: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, H.W. 1941. Contributions to the biology of the Philippine Archipelago and adjacent regions. Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus. 100: 475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudger, E.W. 1914. History of the spotted eagle ray, Aetobatus narinari, together with a study of its external structures. Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution of Washington 6: 241–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, B.W. 1978. Poisonous and venomous marine animals of the world. Darwin Press, Princeton. 1043 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, B.W. & N.C. Bunker. 1953. Stingray attacks and their treatment. Amer. J. Trop. Med. and Hyg. 2: 115–128.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, B.W. & F.R. Modglin. 1950. A preliminary report on the venom apparatus of the bat-ray, Holorhinus californicus. Copeia, 1950: 165–175.

  • Notarbartolo-di-Sciara, G. 1987. A revisionary study of the genus Mobula Rafinesque,1810 (Chondricthyes: Mobulidae) with the description of a new species. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 91: 1–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phisalix, M. 1922. Animaux et venins. Two volumes. Masson et Cie., Paris. (cited by Halstead 1978).

  • Porta, A. 1905. Ricerche anatomiche sull' apparecchio velenifero di alcuni pesci. Anat. Anz. 26: 232–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, R.S. 1985. A systematic revision of the South American freshwater stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae). Ph. D. Dissertation, College of William and Mary in Virginia, Gloucester Point, 523 pp.

  • Russell, F.E. 1955. Multiple caudal spines in the round stingray, Urobatis halleri. Calif. Fish & Game 41: 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, F.J. & M.D. Dahlberg. 1978. Biology and ecology of the Atlantic stingray, Dasyatis sabina (Pisces: Dasyatidae), in North Carolina and Georgia. Northeast Gulf Sci. 2: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, D.G. 1963. Sharks and rays of Australian seas. Halstead Press, Sydney. 211 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teaf, C.M. & T.C. Lewis. 1987. Seasonal occurrence of multiple caudal spines in the Atlantic stingray, Dasyatis sabina (Pisces: Dasyatidae). Copeia 1987: 224–227.

  • Thorson, T.B., J.K. Langhammer & M.I. Oetinger. 1983. Reproduction and development of the South American stingrays, Potamotrygon circularis and P. motoro. Env. Biol. Fish. 9: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J.H. 1967. The batoid fishes of the east coast of southern Africa. Part II. Manta, eagle, duckbill, cownose, butterfly and sting rays. Oceanographic Res. Inst., South African Assoc. Mar. Biol. Res., Durban, Investig. Report 16. 56 pp.

  • Whitley, G.P. 1940. The fishes of Australia. Part I. The sharks, rays, devil-fish, and other primitive fishes of Australia and New Zealand. Royal Zool. Soc. of New South Wales, Sidney. 280 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thorson, T.B., Langhammer, J.K. & Oetinger, M.I. Periodic shedding and replacement of venomous caudal spines, with special reference to South American freshwater stingrays, Potamotrygon spp.. Environ Biol Fish 23, 299–314 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005241

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005241

Key words

Navigation