Skip to main content
Log in

Observations on the behaviours of three European cuckoo bumble bee species (Psithyrus)

Observations sur le comportement reproducteur de trois espèces de bourdons «coucou» européens (Psithyrus)

  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Females of three European species of cuckoo bumble bees (P. bohemicus, P. vestalis, andP. campestris) were introduced into free-foraging laboratory colonies of theirBombus hosts (B. locorum, B. Terrestris andB. pascuorum, respectively). The colony development of one successfully parasitized colony of each bumble bee species was studied.Psithyrus females cohabited with host queens and workers, but monopolized brood development through oophagy, larval ejection and the attempted dominance of host bees. SomePsithyrus brood also was destroyed, and host bees in all three colonies were successful in rearing reproductive offspring. Prolonged social contact betweenPsithyrus females and their hosts, and the possibility of host reproduction in parasitized colonies, suggest that there is considerable opportunity for coevolutionary complexity inBombus-Psithyrus relationships.

Resume

Nous avons introduit des femelles de trois espèces européennes (P. bohemicus, P. vestalis etP. compestris) dans des colonies de laboratoire de leur hôteBombus (B. lucorum, B. terrestris etB. pascuorum) pouvant fourrager librement. Pour chaque espèce de bourdon, nous avons étudié le développement d'une colonie, où des parasites avaient été introduits avec succès. Les femellesPsithyrus ont cohabité avec les reines et les ouvrières hôtes, mais ont monopolisé le développement du couvain à travers l'oophagie, l'expulsion des larves, et les tentatives de dominer les bourdons hôtes. Une partie du couvainPsithyrus a été détruite aussi, et les bourdons hôtes des trois colonies ont réussi à élever du couvain de reproducteurs. Les contacts sociaux prolongés entre les femallesPsithyrus et leurs hôtes, ainsi que la possibilité de reproduction de l'hôte au sein des colonies parasitées semblent indiquer que des complexités coévolutives dans les rapportsBombus-Psithyrus ne sont pas rares.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford D.V., 1975.—Bumblebees,Davis-Poynter, publ., London, 352 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumber R.A., 1949.—Humble-bee parasites and commensals found within a thirty mile radius of London.Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., A 24, 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R.M., 1984.—Dominance by a bumble bee social parasite (Psithyrus citrinus) over markers of its host (Bombus impatiens).Anim. Behav., 32, 303–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R.M., 1987 a.—Queen-worker conflict and social parasitism in bumble bees.Anim. Behav., 35, 1026–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R.M., 1987 b.—Temporal dynamics of facultative social parasitism in bumble bees.Anim. Behav., 35, 1628–1636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R.M., Weary D.M., 1988.—Buzzing bees: communication between bumble bee social parasites (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and their hosts.Bioacoustics, 1, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Free J.B., Weinberg I., Whiten A., 1969.—The egg-eating behaviour ofBombus lapidarius L.Behaviour, 35, 313–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer E., 1888.—Die schmarotzerhummeln Steiermarks. Lebensgeschichte und beschreibung derselben.Mitt. naturw. Ver. Steirermark, 25, 82–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honk C.G.J. van, Velthuis H.H.W., Röseler P.F., Malotaux M.E., 1980.—The mandibular glands ofBombus terrestris queens as a source of queen pheromones.Ent. Exp. & Appl., 28, 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honk C. van, Röseler P.F., Velthuis H. Malotaux M., 1981.—The conquest of aBombus terrestris colony by aPsithyrus vestalis female.Apidologie, 12, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener C.D., 1974.—The Social Behavior of the Bees.Harvard Univ. Press, publ., Cambridge, 404 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkeld E.H., 1978.—The chorionic structure of the eggs of some species of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombinae), and its use in taxonomy.Can. Entomol., 110, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladen F.W.L., 1912.—The humble-bee, its life history and how to domesticate it.Macmillan and Co., publ., London, 283 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tod C., 1986.—Socio-economic effects on colony size in the bumble beeBombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae).MSc Thesis, Massey University, New Zealand, 85 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R.L., Hare H., 1976.—Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects.Science, 191, 249–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, 1961.—The biology of the bumble bees of a limited area in eastern Nebraska.Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, 337 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E.O., 1971.—The Insect Societies.Harvard Univ. Press, publ., Cambridge, Mass, 548 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisher, R.M. Observations on the behaviours of three European cuckoo bumble bee species (Psithyrus). Ins. Soc 35, 341–354 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02225810

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02225810

Keywords

Navigation