Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of filmed modeling on the self-reported frequency of masturbation

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty-eight female college students were asked to complete a sexual attitudes questionnaire in which a frequency of masturbation scale was embedded. Twenty-four of the women (the experimental group) then individually viewed an explicit modeling film involving female masturbation. One month later, all subjects again completed the same questionnaire. Subjects in the experimental group also completed a questionnaire evaluating aspects of the film. Results indicated that the experimental group reported a significant increase in the average monthly frequency of masturbation, as compared to the control group. This same group, however, reported that the film had no effect on sexual attitudes or behavior. The inconsistency of these results is discussed in terms of several possible hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1969).Principles of Behavior Modification Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbach, L. (1974). Group treatment of preorgasmic women.J. Sex Marital Ther. 1: 139–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, W., and Perlman, D. (1975). Volunteer bias and personality traits in sexual standards research.Arch. Sex. behav. 4: 161–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, K. (1973). Volunteer bias in a study of sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behavior.J. Marriage Family 35: 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankovich, R., and Miller, P. (1978). Response of women with primary orgasmic dysfunction to audiovisual education.J. Sex Marital Ther. 4: 16–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaats, G., and Davis, K. (1971). Effects of volunteer biases in studies of sexual behavior and attitudes.J. Sex Res. 7: 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., and Gebhard, P. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiblem, S., and Ersner-Hershfield, R. (1977). Sexual enhancement groups for dysfunctional women: An evaluation.J. Sex Marital Ther. 3: 139–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lobitz, W. C., and LoPiccolo, J. (1972). New methods in the treatment of sexual dysfunction.J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiat. 3: 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W., and Johnson, V. (1970).Human Sexual Inadequacy Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B. (1977). Strategies and techniques for the reduction of sexual anxiety.J. Sex Marital Ther. 3: 243–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Obler, M. (1973). Systematic desensitization in sexual disorders.J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiat. 4: 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotile, W., and Kilmann, P. (1977). Treatments of psychogenic female sexual dysfunctions.Psychol. Bull. 84: 619–633.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heiby, E., Becker, J.D. Effect of filmed modeling on the self-reported frequency of masturbation. Arch Sex Behav 9, 115–121 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542263

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542263

Key words

Navigation