Skip to main content
Log in

Consequences of a mixed reproductive system in the hog peanut, Amphicarpaea bracteata, (Fabaceae)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The forest annual, Amphicarpaea bracteata L. can reproduce via aerial chasmogamous, aerial cleistogamous, and subterranean cleistogamous flowers. Both plant size and light intensity influenced the utilization of the three modes of reproduction. chasmogamous and aerial cleistogamous flower number and the ratio of chasmogamous flowers to the total number of aerial flowers increased with plant size. The latter demonstrated a shift to xenogamy and outbreeding in larger plants. Light intensity indirectly influenced reproductive modes through its infuence on plant size. Seed set by both types of aerial flowers was low and unrelated to plant size. Subterranean seed number and the total dry weight of subterranean seeds per plant increased with size. The subterranean seeds of Amphicarpaea bracteata are thirty-four times larger than the aerial seeds (fresh weight). Under field conditions, subterranean seeds had greater germination after one year than acrial seeds. The plants arising from subterranean seeds were significantly larger and more fecund than those from aerial seeds. Seeds produced by aerial cleistogamous, hand selfpollinated chasmogamous, and naturally pollinated chasmogamous flowers had equivalent germination rates and produced plants of equal size and fecundity. This suggests that the outbred progeny from chasmogamous flowers have no advantage over the inbred progeny from aerial cleistogamous flowers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard HA (1932) Flowering behavior of the hog peanut in response to length of day. J Agric Res 44:127–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheplick GP, Quinn JA (1982) Amphicarpum purshii and the ‘pessimistic strategy’ in amphicarpic annuals with subterranean fruits. Oecologia (Berlin) 52:327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1984) Variation strategies of plants in heterogenous environments. Biol J Linn Soc 21:357–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord EM (1981) Cleistogamy: a tool for the study of floral morphogenesis function and evolution. Bot Rev 47:421–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JL (1979) Fundamentals of experimental design. Allyn & Bacon Inc., Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter J, Wasserman W, Kunter MH (1983) Applied linear regression models. RD Irwin Inc., Homewood, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilj L van der (1982) Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1985) SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Cary, North Carolina

  • Schemske DW (1978) Evolution of reproductive characteristics in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): the significance of cleistogamy and chasmogamy. Ecology 59:596–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Schively AC (1897) Contributions to the life history of Amphicarpaea monoica Contrib Bot Lab Penna Univ 1:270–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnee BK, Waller DM (1986) Reproductive behavior of Amphicarpaea bracteata (Leguminosae), an amphicarpic annual. Am J Bot 73:376–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen DJ, Lloyd DG (1984) The selection of cleistogamy and heteromorphic diaspores. Biol J Linn Soc 23:303–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. WH Freeman & Co, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapp, EJ (1986) Mixed reproductive tactics in the hog peanut, Amphicarpaea bracteata L. PhD thesis, Univ of Iowa, Iowa City

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Fearing OS (1964) A taxonomic study of the genus Amphicarpaea (Leguminosae). Southwest Nat 9:207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphof JCT (1938) Cleistogamic flowers. Bot Rev 4:21–49

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Data Service, Climatological Data (Iowa) Annual Survey (1983–1984) Vol 94–95, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climate Center, Asheville, North Carolina

  • Venable DL (1985) The evolution of seed heteromorphism. Am Nat 126:577–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller DM (1980) Environmental deteminants of outcrossing in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Evolution 34:747–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilken DH (1982) The balance between chasmogamy and cleistogamy in Collomia grandiflora (Polemoniaceae). Am J Bot 69:1326–1333

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joseph Trapp, E., Hendrix, S.D. Consequences of a mixed reproductive system in the hog peanut, Amphicarpaea bracteata, (Fabaceae). Oecologia 75, 285–290 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378611

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378611

Key words

Navigation