Skip to main content
Log in

Nuptial feeding in tettigoniids male costs and the rates of fecundity increase

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A recent debate has centred on the importance of paternal investment for the origin and maintenance of nuptial feeding in insects. Some authors have argued that the rates of nutrient incorporation are likely to be too slow to allow a male to fertilize the eggs that he helps to produce and cannot be considered as paternal investment. Here I report the results of some experiments that show that the positive effects of nutrient donation on female reproduction for one species of spermatophylax producing tettigoniid can be realized within 24 to 48 h. Furthermore, mating was found to induce a refractory period in the female that was longer than the time taken for the incorporation of nutrients and oviposition. Thus, the nurturant male is likely to fertilize the eggs even if last-male sperm precedence is high. The cost of spermatophylax production was manifest as a 5-day recovery period between matings. Thus males and their donations are likely to be limited resources for females resulting in a reversal of the typical sex roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RD, Borgia G (1979) On the origin and basis of the male-female phenomenon. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 417–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL, Gilbert LE (1979) Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science 206:83–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen BJ, Codd CG, Gwynne DT (1984) The katydid spermatophore (Orthoptera:Tettigoniidae): male nutrient investment and its fate in the mated female. Aust J Zool 32:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Butlin RK, Woodhatch CW, Hewitt GM (1987) Male spermatophore investment increases female fecundity in a grasshopper. Evolution 41:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Capinera J (1979) Qualitative variation in plants and insects: effect of propagule size on ecological plasticity. Am Nat 114:350–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield M (1982) The question of paternal investment in lepidoptera: male contributed proteins in Plodia interpunctella. Int J Invert Reprod 5:323–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1983) Male nutrient investment and the evolution of sexual differences in tettigoniidae and other orthoptera. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems: sexual selection in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Colorado, pp 337–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1984a) Courtship feeding increases female reproductive success in bushcrickets. Nature 307:361–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1984b) Sexual selection and sexual differences in Mormon crickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Anabrus simplex). Evolution 38:1011–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1985) Role-reversal in katydids: habitat influences reproductive behaviour (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Metaballus sp.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:355–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1986a) Reply to: stepfathers and their pseudo-parental investment. Ethology 71:74–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1986b) Courtship feeding in katydids: investment in offspring or in obtaining fertilizations? Am Nat 128:342–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1988a) Courtship feeding and the fitness of female katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Evolution 42:545–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1988b) Courtship feeding in katydids benefits the mating male's offspring. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:373–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT, Bailey WJ (1988) Mating system, mate choice and ultrasonic calling in a zaprochiline katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behaviour 105:202–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT, Bowen BJ, Codd CG (1984) The function of the katydid spermatophore and its role in fecundity and insemination (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Aust J Zool 32:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey GT (1985) Egg weight as a factor in the overwintering survival of spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larvae. Can Entomol 117:1451–1461

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton H (1981) The biology of insect eggs. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Simmons LW (1989) Nuptial feeding in insects: theoretical models of male and female interests. Ethology 82:3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK (1985) Spermatophore size and its role in the reproductive behaviour of the cricket, Gryllodes supplicans (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Can J Zool 63:1652–1656

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK (1986) Is courtship feeding by male insects paternal investment? Ethology 73:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1988a) Male size, mating potential and lifetime reproductive success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). Anim Behav 36:372–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1988b) The contribution of multiple mating and spermatophore consumption to the lifetime reproductive success of female field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus). Ecol Entomol 13:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Bailey WJ (1990) Resource influenced sex roles of a zaprochiline tettigoniid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Evolution (in press)

  • Simmons LW, Parker GA (1989) Nuptial feeding in insects: mating effort versus paternal investment. Ethology 81:332–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Svard L, Wiklund C (1988) Fecundity, egg weight and longevity in relation to multiple matings in females of the monarch butterfly. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1976a) Sexual selection and paternal investment in insects. Am Nat 110:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1976b) Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behaviour in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). Am Nat 110:529–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the decent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker WF (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in non-social insects. Am Nat 115:780–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Arak A (1989) The wartbiter spermatophore and its effect on female reproductive output (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Decticus verrucivorus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickler W (1985) Stepfathers in insects and their pseudo-parental investment. Z Tierpsychol 69:72–78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simmons, L.W. Nuptial feeding in tettigoniids male costs and the rates of fecundity increase. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27, 43–47 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183312

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183312

Keywords

Navigation