Abstract
How do we appear to handle danger in our culture? That is the main, sociological question, I want to discuss, and our responses to chemicals are a particularly good entrance point. So I am not addressing problems like the health risks of a chemical or procedures of standard setting. Such technical questions are obviously important, but they are not the whole story. Nor is the psychology of risk perception my first concern. Both technical and psychological questions should be seen as embedded in social and cultural patterns. It is the socio-cultural aspect that I want to highlight. Not only because it is important by itself, and has often been neglected,1 but also because it will allow me to explore some of the normative issues of risk communication as one part of how we handle dangers in our society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brickman, R., S. Jasanoff and T. Ilgen. 1985. Controlling chemicals: The politics of regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Brown, P. 1987. Popular epidemiology: Community response to toxic waste-induced disease in Woburn, Massachusetts. Science, Technology &. Human Values 12, Nos. 3 and 4: 78–85.
Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and taboo. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Douglas, M. 1979. Cultural bias. London: Royal Anthropological Society, Occasional Paper.
Douglas, M. and A. Wildavsky. 1985. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ebisch, R. 1985. A layman’s guide to modern menaces. TWA Ambassador (October): 49–58.
Fischhoff, B. 1984. Setting standards: A systematic approach to managing public health and safety risks. Management Science 30 (7): 823–843.
Fitchen, J.M. 1987. Cultural aspects of environmental problems: Individualism and chemical contamination of groundwater. Science, Technology & Human Values 12, No. 2: 1–12.
Foster, D. and M. Dowie. 1982. The illusion of safety. Part one. Poisoned research, Mother Jones (June): 38–48.
Goudsblom, J. 1984. Vuur en beschaving. De domesticatie van vuur als een beschavingsproces (1). De Gids 147 (4): 227–241.
Goudsblom, J. 1985. Vuur en beschaving. De domesticatie van vuur als een beschavingsproces (2),(3). De Gids 148 (1): 3–21, (9/10): 714–722.
Hall, R.H. 1974. Food for nought. The decline of nutrition. N.Y.: Harper and Row.
Hohenemser, C., R.W. Kates and P. Slovic. 1983. The nature of technological hazard. Science 220: 378–384.
Huber, P. 1984. Discarding the double standard in risk regulation. Technology Review (January): 10–14.
Jasanoff, S.S. 1987. Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science 17: 195–230.
Kasperson, R.E. 1983. Acceptability of human risk. Environmental Health Perspectives 52:15–20.
Kasperson, R.E., O. Renn, P. Slovic et al. 1988. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis 8: 177–187.
Kunreuther, H. (ed.), 1981. Risk: A seminar series. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
March, J.G. 1978. Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics 9: 587–608.
Merton, R.K. 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press: Ch. VI. Social Structure and Anomie.
Morgan, M., H. Granger, K. Florig et al. 1985. Power-line fields and human health. IEEE Spectrum 22 (2): 62–68.
Nelson, R. and S.E. Winter. 1977. In search of a useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 6: 36–76.
Plough, A. and S. Krimsky. 1987. The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context. Science, Technology & Human Values 12, Nos. 3 and 4: 4–10.
Rip, A. 1982. The development of restrictedness in the sciences. In N. Elias, H. Martins and R. Whitley (eds.), Scientific establishment and hierarchies. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 219–238.
Rip, A. 1986a. Controversies as informal technology assessment. Knowledge 8 (2) (Dec): 349–371.
Rip, A. 1986b. The mutual dependence of risk research and political context. Science & Technology Studies 4 (3/4), (Fall/Winter): 3–15.
Scholz, J.T. 1984. Cooperation, deterrence, and the ecology of regulatory enforcement. Law and Society 18: 179–224.
Schwarz, M. and M. Thompson. 1990. Divided We Stand. Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. Hemel Hempstead, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Sims, J.H. and D.B. Baumann. 1972. The tornado threat: coping styles of the north and the south. Science 176: 1386–1392.
Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science 236: 280–285.
Thompson, M. and A. Wildavsky. 1982. A proposal to create a cultural theory of risk. In H. Kunreuther and E. Ley (eds), The risk analysis controversy: An institutional perspective. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 145–161.
Tiryakian, E.A. 1972. Toward the sociology of esoteric culture, Am.J. Sociol. 78: 491–512.
Turner, B.A. 1981. Organisational responses to hazard. In H. Kunreuther (ed.) Laxenburg: IIASA, pp. 49–86.
Wynne, B. 1982. Rationality and ritual. The Winds cale inquiry and nuclear decisions in Britain. Chalfont St. Giles: British Society for the History of Science.
Wynne, B. (ed.) 1987. Risk management and hazardous wastes: Implementation and the dialectics of credibility. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Wynne, B. 1988. Unruly Technology: practical rules, impractical discourses and public understanding. Social Studies of Science 18: 147–167.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rip, A. (1991). The danger culture of industrial society. In: Kasperson, R.E., Stallen, P.J.M. (eds) Communicating Risks to the Public. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7372-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1952-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive