Skip to main content

Amaryllidaceae

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants ((FAMILIES GENERA,volume 3))

Abstract

Bulbous (rarely rhizomatous), mostly geophytic, perennials, terrestrial, occasionally aquatic or epiphytic, rich in family-specific alkaloids. Bulbs tunicate. Leaves annual or persistent, sessile and linear or lorate, or petiolate and lanceolate to widely elliptic, distichous or spirally arranged; sometimes basally sheathing and forming an aerial pseudostem, usually glabrous, rarely with trichomes. Inflorescence scapose, pseudoumbellate (reduced helicoid cymes); scape sometimes wholly subterranean and appearing obsolete, terminated by 2 or more spathaceous, obvolute or equitant, usually marcescent bracts that enclose the flowers in bud (bracts rarely absent); inner bracteoles usually present and successively shorter and narrower. Flowers 1–many, perfect, frequently large and showy, sessile or pedicellate, each usually subtended by a bracteole, actinomorphic or zygomorphic, generally protandrous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  • Aksenova, L.M., Sedova, E.D. 1981. Bulb structure and morphogenesis of some representatives of the family Amaryllidaceae. Ukr. J. Bot. 4: 41–45 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber, A. 1937. Studies in flower structure III. On the corona and androecium in certain Amaryllidaceae. Ann. Bot. II, 1: 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, S.C. 1981. Systematic anatomical studies on Amaryllidaceae including morphological, ecological, cytological and phytogeographical considerations. Ph.D Thesis. Reading: University of Reading, 238 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, S.C. 1984. Contribution al conocimiento de los bulbos de Amaryllidaceae. Kurtziana 17: 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, S.C., Cutler, D.F. 1984. Evolutionary and taxonomic aspects of the internal morphology in Amaryllidaceae from South America and Southern Africa. Kew Bull. 39: 467–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artyushenko, Z.T. 1989. Aspects of research on Amaryllidaceae Jaume. Herbertia 45: 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J.G. 1881. A synopsis of the known species of Crinum L. Gard. Chron. 1881 (1): 763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S.C.H., Lloyd, D.G., Arroyo, J. 1995. Stylar polymorphisme and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In: Lloyd, D.G., Barrett, S.C.H. (eds.) Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York: Chapman and Hall, pp. 339–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauml, J.A. 1979. A study of the genus Hymenocallis (Amaryllidaceae) in Mexico. Unpubl. M.S. Thesis. Ithaca: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, H.D. 1981. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W.D. 1977. More potentials in Amaryllis breeding. Plant Life 33: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, S., Flory, W.S. 1963. A study of phylogeny and of karyotype evolution in Lycoris. Nucleus 6: 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W.V. 1951. Apomixis in Zephyranthes texana Herb. Am. J. Bot. 38: 697–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyles, S.B., Wyatt, R. 1991. The breeding system of Zephryanthes atamasco (Amaryllidaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 118: 137–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheadle, V.I. 1969. Vessels in Amaryllidaceae and Tecophilaeaceae. Phytomorphology 19: 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, M.B.M., Lled6, D., Fay, M.F., Chase, M.W. 1996. Molecular phylogeny of Leucojum based on ITS sequences. Am. J. Bot. 6 (Suppl.): 149 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafni, A., Werker, E. 1982. Pollination ecology of Sternbergia clusiana (Ker-Gawler) Spreng. ( Amaryllidaceae ). New Phytol. 91: 571–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R.M.T., Clifford, H.T. 1982. See general references. Dahlgren, R., Rasmussen, F.N. 1983. Monocotyledon evolution: characters and phylogenetic analysis. Evol. Biol. 16: 255–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R.M.T. et al. 1985. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumann, E. 1970. Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledonen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung. Feddes Repert 80: 463–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.L. 1966. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Fulvio, T.E. 1973. Contribution al conocimiento cariol6gico de Amaryllidaceae. Estudio cromosdmico en Hieronymiella y otras genéros afines. Kurtziana 7: 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, J.A., Vasquez, R. 1994. Amazonian ethnobotanical dictionary. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt, B.S.M. 1962. A contribution to the life history of Crin um defixum. In: Plant embryology - a symposium. New Dehli: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, pp. 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman, G. 1952. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K., van der Pijl, L. 1979. Principles of pollination ecology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, M.F., Chase, M.W. 1996. Resurrection of Themidaceae for the Brodiaea alliance, and recircumscription of Alliaceae, Amaryllidaceae and Agapanthoideae. Taxon 45: 441–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, M.F., Meerow, A.W., Hartwell, J., Chase, M.W. 1995. Molecular systematics and biogeography of the Amaryllidaceae. Am. J. Bot. 82 (Suppl.): 129 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A. 1942. Summary of work on cytology of Narcissus L. Herbertia 9: 126–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A. 1967. Contribution à la connaissance de la biosystématique de quleques espèces du genre Narcissus L. Portug. Acta Biol. 9: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A. 1968. Improvements in the classification of the genus Narcissus L. Plant Life 24: 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory, W.S. 1939. Parthenogensis in Zephyrantheae. Herbertia 6: 196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory, W.S. 1967. Sprekelia chromsomes. Plant Life 23: 54–57. Flory, W.S. 1968. Chromosome diversity in species, and in hybrids, of tribe Zephyrantheae. Nucleus 11: 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory, W.S. 1976. Distribution, chromosome number and types of various species and taxa of Hymenocallis. Nucleus 19: 204–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory, W.S. 1977. Overview of chromosomal evolution in the Amaryllidaceae. Nucleus 20: 70–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory, W.S., Schmidhauser, T.F. 1957. Mitotic chromosome numbers in Hymenocallis with a consideration of factors possibly affecting numbers and karyotypes. Genetics 42: 369–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frölich, D., Barthlott, W. 1988. Mikromorphologie der epicuticularen Wachse und das System der Monokotylen. Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt (Akad. Wiss. Lit. Mainz ) 63: 1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., Shivanna, K.R. 1984. Structure and cytochemistry of the stigma and pollen-pistil interactions in Zephyranthes. Ann. Bot. II, 53: 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R.D. 1974. Chemotaxonomy of flowering plants, vol. I. Montréal: McGill-Queens Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, P. 1976. Chromosome cytology of Hessea, Strumaria, and Carpolyza (Amaryllidaceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 63: 314–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, P. 1978. An analysis of the flora of southern Africa: its characteristics, relationships, and origins. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 65: 369–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouws, J.B. 1949. Karyology of some South African Amaryllidaceae. Plant Life 5: 54–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V. 1983. The systematic and geographical distribution of hawkmoth flowers in the temperate North American flora. Bot. Gaz. 144: 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau, J., Bayer, E. 1991. Zur systematischen Stellung der Gattung Traubia Moldenke (Amaryllidaceae). Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. Minch. 30: 479–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannibal, L.S. 1967. A primitive amaryllid - Hannonia hesperidium. Plant Life 23: 143–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R. 1963. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, Y., Shivanna, K.R. 1977. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Ann. Bot. II, 41: 1233–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, G., Prakash, N. 1990. Embryology and reproductive ecology of the Darling lily, Crinum flaccidum Herbert. Aust. J. Bot. 38: 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, H. 1969. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inariyama, S. 1931. Cytological studies in the genus Lycoris. Bot. Mag. ( Tokyo ) 45: 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inariyama, S. 1933. Phylogeny of Lycoris from the karyological point of view. Rep. Jpn. Sci. Congr. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inariyama, S. 1937. Karyotype studies in Amaryllidaceae I. Sci. Rep. Tokyo Bunrika Daigaku, Sect. B 3 (52): 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inariyama, S. 1953. Cytological studies in Lycoris. Seiken Ziho 6: 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ising, G. 1970. Evolution of karyotypes in Cyrtanthus. Hereditas 65: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D., Bond, W.J. 1994. Red flowers and butterfly pollination in the fynbos of South Africa. In: Arianoutsou, M., Groves, R.H. (eds.) Plant-animal interactions in mediterranean-type ecosystems. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 137–148.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., Smith, J.B. 1967. Chromosome evolution in the genus Crin um. Caryologia 20: 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshimizu, T. 1930. Carpobiological studies of Crin um asiaticum L. var. japonicum Bak. Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto Imp. Univ., Ser. B., Biol. 5: 183–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurita, S. 1986. Variation and evolution in the karyotype of Lycoris, Amaryllidaceae I. General karyomorphological characteristics of the genus. Cytologia 51: 803–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurita, S. 1987a. Variation and evolution on the karyotype of Lycoris, Amaryllidaceae II. Karyotype analysis of ten taxa, among which seven are native in China. Cytologia 52: 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurita, S. 1987b. Variation and evolution in the karyotype of Lycoris, Amaryllidaceae III. Intraspecific variation in the karyotype of L. traubii Hayward. Cytologia 52: 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurita, S. 1987c. Variation and evolution in the karyotype of Lycoris, Amaryllidaceae IV. Cytologia 52: 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurita, S. 1989. Variation and evolution of the karyotype of Lycoris, Amaryllidaceae V. Chromosomal variation in L. sanguina Maxim. Plant Species Biol. 4: 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmi, N. 1978. Cytological studies in two allopolyploid species of the genus Hymenocallis. Cytologia 43: 555–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loubser, J., Zietsman, P.C. 1994. Rock painting of postulated Brunsvigia sp., (Amaryllidaceae) at Thaba Bosiu, western Lesotho. S. Afr. J. Sci. 90: 611–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markötter, E.I. 1936. Die lewensgeskiedenis van sekere geslagte van die Amaryllidaceae. Ann. Univ. Stellenbosch XIV.A. 2: 1–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, A.W. 1984. Karyotype evolution in the Amaryllidaceae. Herbertia 40: 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, A.W. 1985. The evolutionary significance of pancratioid floral morphology in the Amaryllidaceae. Am. J. Bot. 72: 962. (Abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, A.W. 1987a. A monograph of Eucrosia (Amaryllidaceae). Syst. Bot. 12: 460–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, A.W. 1987b. Chromosome cytology of Eucharis, Caliphruria, and Urceolina. Am. J. Bot. 74: 1559–1575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, A.W. 1987c. The identities and systematic affinities of Mathieua Klotzsch and Plagiolirion Baker ( Amaryllidaceae ). Taxon 36: 566–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, A.W. 1989. A monograph of the Amazon lilies, Eucharis and Caliphruria (Amaryllidaceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 76: 136–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, A.W. 1995. Towards a phylogeny of the Amaryllidaceae. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, A.W., Dehgan, B. 1985. The auriculate pollen grain of Hymenocallis quitoensis Herb. (Amaryllidaceae) and its systematic implications. Am. J. Bot. 72: 540–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrow, A.W., Dehgan, B. 1988. Pollen morphology of the Eucharideae (Amaryllidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 75: 1857–1870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, A.W., Dehgan, N.B., Dehgan, B. 1986. Pollen tetrads in Stenomesson elwesii (Amaryllidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 73: 1642–1644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J.K. 1965. The experimental taxonomy of the West African species of Pancratium L. ( Amaryllidaceae ). Kew Bull. 19: 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Doblies, D. 1977. Über den geometrischen Zusammenhang der monochasialen Verzweigungen am Beispiel einiger Liliifloren. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 90: 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Doblies, D., Müller-Doblies, U. 1972. Galan thus ist doch sympodial gebaut. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 84: 665–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Doblies, D., Müller-Doblies, U. 1978a. Bulbs and morphology: Ungernia. Lagascalia 8: 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Doblies, D., Müller-Doblies, U. 1978b. Studies on tribal systematics of Amaryllidaceae 1. The systematic position of Lapiedra Lag. Lagascalia 8: 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Doblies, D., Müller-Doblies, U. 1985. De Liliifloris notulae 2. De taxonomia subtribus Strumariinae (Amaryllidaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 107: 17–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Doblies, D., Müller-Doblies, U. 1996. Tribes and sub-tribes and some species combinations in Amaryllidaceae J. St.-Hil. emend. R. Dahlgren liuya al. 1985. Feddes Rep. 107: S.c. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, C.A., Andrada, A.B. 1975. El cariôtipo fundamental en el genéro Hippeastrum Herb. ( Amaryllidaceae ). Darwiniana 19: 566–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordal, I., Duncan, T. 1984. A cladistic analysis of Haemanthus and Scadoxus. Nord. J. Bot. 4: 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordal, I., Rorslett, B., Laane, M.M. 1977. Species delimitation within the Crinum ornatum group (Amaryllidaceae) in East Africa. Norw. J. Bot. 24: 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pax, F. 1887. Amaryllidaceae. In: Engler, A., Prantl, K. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien II, 5. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, G.R., Pettit III, G.R., Backhaus, R.A., Boyd, M.R., Meerow, A.W. 1993. Antineoplastic agents 256. Cell growth-inhibitory isocarbostyrils from Hymenocallis. J. Nat. Prod. 56: 1682–1687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, G.R., Pettit III, G.B., Groszek, G., Backhaus, R.A., Doubek, D.L., Meerow, A.W. 1995. Antineoplastic agents 301. An investigation of the genus Hymenocallis Salisbury (Amaryllidaceae). J. Nat. Prod. 58: 756–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prillieux, E. 1858. De la structure et du mode formation des graines bulbiformes de quelques amaryllidées. Ann. Sci. Nat. 4: 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raina, S.N. 1978. Genetic mechanisms underlying evolution in Crinum. Cytologia 43: 575–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raina, S.N., Khoshoo, T.N. 1972. Cytogenetics of tropical bulbous ornamentals. IX. Breeding systems in Zephyranthes. Euphytica 21: 317–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P.H., Axelrod, D.I. 1974. Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 61: 539–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenna, P. 1974. Griffiniae Ray., tribus nova. Plant Life 30:65. Reid, C., Dyer, R.A. 1984. A review of the Southern African species of Cyrtanthus. La Jolla: American Plant Life Society. Rendle, A.B. 1901. The bulbiform seeds of certain Amaryllidaceae. J. R. Hortic. Soc. 26: 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satô, D. 1938. Karyotype evolution and phylogeny. IV. Karyotype in Amaryllidaceae with special reference to SAT chromosomes. Cytologia 9: 203–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlimbach, H. von 1924. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der afrikanischen Flora V. Bull. Herb. Boiss. 4: 809–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultes, R.E. 1976. Hallucinogenic plants. New York: Golden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultes, R.E., Raffauf, R.F. 1990. The healing forest. Portland: Dioscorides Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. 1972. Floral morphology of the Amaryllidaceae. 1. Subfamily Amaryllidoideae. Can. J. Bot. 50: 1555–1565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijman, D.A. 1992. Systematic studies in the tribe Amaryllideae (Amaryllidaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijman, D.A. 1994. Systematics of Hessea, Strumaria and Carpolyza (Amaryllideae: Amaryllidaceae). Contrib. Bolus Herb. 16: 1–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijman, D.A., Linder, H.P. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships, seed characters, and dispersal system evolution in Amaryllideae (Amaryllidaceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 83: 362–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijman, D.A., Williamson, G. 1994. A taxonomic reassessment of Ammocharis herrei and Cybistetes longifolia ( Amaryllidaceae ). Bothalia 24: 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, H-D. 1995. Seedlings and systematics in monocotyledons. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 303–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomita, K. 1931. Über die Entwicklung des nackten Embryos von Crin um latifolium L. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Imperial Univ., IV, Biol. 6: 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traub, H.P. 1962. Key to the subgenera, alliances and species of Hymenocallis. Plant Life 18: 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traub, H.P. 1963. Genera of the Amaryllidaceae. La Jolla: American Plant Life Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traub, H.P. 1966. Polyembryony in Hymenocallis mexicana. Plant Life 22: 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traub, H.P., Moldenke, H.N. 1949. Amaryllidaceae: tribe Amarylleae. La Jolla: American Plant Life Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, F.C. 1981. Plant motifs on Inca ceremonial vases from Peru. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 82: 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. 1963. Das sexuelle Anlockungsprinzip der Catasetinen-und Stanhopeen Blüten und die wahre Funktion ihres sogenannten Futtergewebes. Oesterr. Bot. Z. 110: 308–337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. 1990. The role of scent glands in pollination. New Dehli: Amerind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosa, C.G. 1986. Chromosome studies in the genus Gethyllis ( Amaryllidaceae ). Caryologia 39: 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlstrom, R., Laane, M.M. 1979. Chromosome analyses in African Crinum spp. Hereditas 91: 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J.W., Doyle, J.A. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 62: 664–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, J.M., Breyer-Brandwijk, M.G. 1962. The medicinal and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa. Edinburgh: E. and S. Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werker, E., Fahn, A. 1975. Seed anatomy of Pancratium species from three different habitats. Bot. Gaz. 136: 396–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, M.R., Brown, C.A. 1940. The seeds of the spider lily Hymenocallis occidentalis. Am. J. Bot. 27: 199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, W.C. 1968. The Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. Alkaloids 11: 307–405.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.D. 1981. Chromosome count for Paramongaia weberbaueri Velarde. Plant Life 37: 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilsenach, R. 1965. On the caryology and phylogeny of some genera of Amaryllidaceae. Plant Life 21: 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, M.A., Chakraborty, B.N. 1974. Cytogenetics of Amaryllidaceae: I. Karyomorphology and meiotic behavior of inversion heterozygote Eurycles sylves tris Salisb. Bangladesh J. Bot. 3: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meerow, A.W., Snijman, D.A. (1998). Amaryllidaceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) Flowering Plants · Monocotyledons. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03533-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03533-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08377-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03533-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics