Skip to main content

Moral Ecology Approaches to Machine Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 74))

Abstract

Wallach and Allen’s seminal book, Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong, categorized theories of machine ethics by the types of algorithms each employs (e.g., top-down vs. bottom-up), ultimately concluding that a hybrid approach would be necessary. Humans are hybrids individually: our brains are wired to adapt our evaluative approach to our circumstances. For example, stressors can inhibit the action of oxytocin in the brain, thus forcing a nurse who usually acts from subjective empathy to defer to objective rules instead. In contrast, ecosystem approaches to ethics promote hybridization across, rather than within, individuals; the nurse being empowered to specialize in personalized care because other workers specialize in standardization, and profitability. Various philosophers have argued, or laid the framework to argue, that such specialization can be advantageous to teams and societies. Rather than mass-produce identical machines to emulate the best individual human, perhaps we should build diverse teams of machines to emulate the best human teams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alford JR, Funk CL, Hibbing JR (2005) Are political orientations genetically transmitted? Am Polit Sci Rev 99:153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arias-Carrión Ó, Pöppel E (2007) Dopamine, learning and reward–seeking behavior. Acta Neurobioligiae Experimentalis 67:481–488

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barreto M, Ellmers N (2002) The impact of anonymity and group identification on pro–group behavior in computer–mediated groups. Small Group Res 33:590–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berea A, Twardy C (2013) Automated trading in prediction markets. In: Kennedy WG, Agarwal N, Yang SJ (eds) Social computing, behavioral–cultural modeling and prediction. Springer, Berlin, pp 111–122

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caruana R, Niculescu–Mizil A (2006) An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning. The Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 161–168

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charlesworth A (1980) A proof of Gödel’s Theorem in terms of computer programs. Math Mag 54:109–121

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Creative Commons (2007) Attribution–ShareAlike 3.0 unported (CC BY–SA 3.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by–sa/3.0/ Accessed 8 Oct 2012

  8. Cushman F, Young L, Hauser M (2006) The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. Psychol Sci 17:1082–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Jong KA (2006) Evolutionary computation: a unified approach. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dean T (2012) Evolution and moral diversity. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 7 (1): 1-16

    Google Scholar 

  11. Denison, DR (1990) Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diener E, Fujita F (2005) Life satisfaction set point: stability and change. J Pers Soc Psychol 88:158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunbar K, Fugelsang J (2005) Causal thinking in science: how scientists and students interpret the unexpected. Sci Technol Think 57–79

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eddy DM, Adler J, Patterson B, Lucas D, Smith KA, Morris M (2011) Individualized guidelines: the potential for increasing quality and reducing costs. Ann Intern Med 154:627–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fan P (2011) Innovation capacity and economic development: China and India. Econ Change Restructuring 44:49–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fehr E, Gachter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Free Software Foundation, Inc (2008) GNU free documentation license. http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html Accessed 8 Oct 2012

  18. Giarratano JC, Riley GD (2005) Expert systems, principles and programming. Thomson Course Technology, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  19. Graham J, Haidt J, Nosek BA (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J Pers Soc Psychol 96:1029–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Greene JD (2009) The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences IV. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hanson R (2007) Logarithmic market scoring rules for modular combinatorial information aggregation. J Prediction Markets 1:3–15

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heisenberg W (1927) Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik 43:172–198

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Hofstede, GH (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  24. Isen AM, Levin PF (1972) Effect of feeling good on helping: cookies and kindness. J Pers Soc Psychol 21:384–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kanai R, Feilden T, Firth C, Rees G (2011) Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Curr Biol 21:677–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kitcher P (1990) The division of cognitive labor. J Philos 87:5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kohlberg L (1981) The philosophy of moral development. Harper & Row, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kram ML, Kramer GL, Ronan PJ, Steciuk M, Petty F (2002) Dopamine receptors and learned helplessness in the rat: an autoradiographic study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 26:639–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kulkarni D, Simon HA (1988) The processes of scientific discovery: the strategy of experimentation. Cogn Sci 12:139–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lind G (1978) Wie misst man moralisches Urteil? Probleme und alternative Möglichkeiten der Messung eines komplexen Konstrukts. In: Portele G (ed) Sozialisation Und Moral. Beltz, Weinheim, pp 171–201

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lykken D, Tellegen A (1996) Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychol Sci 7:186–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  35. Milgram S (1963) Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 67:371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Newton I (1676) personal letter. In: Turnbull HW (ed) The correspondence of Isaac Newton, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 416

    Google Scholar 

  37. Norman WT (1963) Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 66:574–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Reilly CA, Chatman J, Caldwell DF (1991) People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Acad Manag J 34:487–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Page SE (2011) Diversity and complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Pascal B, Havet E (1852) Pensées. Dezobry et E. Magdeleine

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pinker S (2011) The better angels of our nature: why violence has declined. Viking Adult, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pizarro DA, Laney C, Morris EK, Loftus EF (2006) Ripple effects in memory: judgments of moral blame can distort memory for events. Mem Cogn 34:550–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Polgreen PM, Nelson FD, Neumann GR, Weinstein RA (2007) Use of prediction markets to forecast infectious disease activity. Clin Infect Dis 44:272–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Quere CL, Harrison SP, Colin Prentice I, Buitenhuis ET, Aumont O, Bopp L, Claustre H (2005) Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models. Glob Change Biol 11:2016–2040

    Google Scholar 

  45. Raymond E (2000) The cathedral and the bazaar. http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/homesteading/cathedral–bazaar/ Accessed 8 Oct 2012

  46. Rest J (1979) Development in judging moral issues. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  47. Santos-Lang CC (2002). Ethics for artificial intelligences. Presented at the 2002 Wisconsin State-wide technology symposium. http://santoslang.wordpress.com/article/ethics-for-artificial-intelligences-3iue30fi4gfq9-1/ Accessed July 2011

  48. Sauper C (2008) Automated creation of Wikipedia articles. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schiff JL (2011) Cellular automata: a discrete view of the world. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  50. Servan-Schreiber E, Wolfers J, Pennock DM, Galebach B (2004) Prediction markets: does money matter? Electron Markets 14:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Slovic P (2007) If I look at the mass I will never act: Psychic numbing and genocide. Judgment Decis Making 2:79–95

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sober E, Wilson DS (1998) Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sober E, Wilson S (2000) Summary of: unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. J Conscious Stud 7:185–206

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sosis R, Ruffle BJ (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibuttzun. Curr Anthropol 44:713–722

    Google Scholar 

  55. Steare R (2006) Ethicability. Roger Steare Consulting, London

    Google Scholar 

  56. Steil B, Victor DG, Nelson RR (2002) Technological Innovation and Economic Performance. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  57. Stephens SL, Martin RE, Clinton NE (2007) Prehistoric fire area and emissions from California’s forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands. For Ecol Manage 251:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Stephens SL, Ruth LW (2005) Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:532–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Taleb NN (2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random House Digital. Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  60. Thompson A (1996) Silicon evolution. In: Proceedings of the first annual conference on genetic programming. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 444–452

    Google Scholar 

  61. Turiel E (1983) The development of social knowledge: morality and convention. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  62. Versel N (2013) NCQA tests new healthcare quality measure. Information Week. April 12

    Google Scholar 

  63. Walker LJ, Frimer JA, Dunlop WL (2010) Varieties of moral personality: beyond the banality of heroism. J Pers 78:907–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wallach W, Allen C, Smit I (2008) Machine morality: bottom–up and top-down approaches for modeling human moral faculties. AI Soc 22:565–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Wallach W, Allen C (2008) Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wilde D (2011) Personalities into teams. Eng Manage Rev IEEE 39:20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wilson DS, Wilson EO (2008) Evolution “for the good of the group”. Am Sci 96:380–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wilson DS, Near D, Miller R (1996) Machiavellianism: a synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychol Bull 119:285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wittgenstein L (1958) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wolfers J , Zitzewitz E (2004) Prediction markets. No. w10504. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  71. Yamagishi T (2003) Cross–societal experimentation on trust: a comparison of the United States and Japan. In: Ostrom E, Walker J (eds) Trust and reciprocity: interdisciplinary lessons from experimental evidence. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, pp 352–370

    Google Scholar 

  72. Yang X-S (2009) Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on stochastic algorithms: foundations and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 169–178

    Google Scholar 

  73. Zak P (2011) The physiology of moral sentiments. J Econ Behav Organ 77:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Charles Santos-Lang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Santos-Lang, C.C. (2015). Moral Ecology Approaches to Machine Ethics. In: van Rysewyk, S., Pontier, M. (eds) Machine Medical Ethics. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 74. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08107-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08108-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics