Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Therapeutic Proteins

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Therapeutic Proteins

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 899))

Abstract

Protein-based therapeutics are highly successful in clinic and currently enjoy unprecedented recognition of their potential. More than 100 genuine and similar number of modified therapeutic proteins are approved for clinical use in the European Union and the USA with 2010 sales of US$108 bln; monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) accounted for almost half (48%) of the sales. Based on their pharmacological activity, they can be divided into five groups: (a) replacing a protein that is deficient or abnormal; (b) augmenting an existing pathway; (c) providing a novel function or activity; (d) interfering with a molecule or organism; and (e) delivering other compounds or proteins, such as a radionuclide, cytotoxic drug, or effector proteins. Therapeutic proteins can also be grouped based on their molecular types that include antibody-based drugs, Fc fusion proteins, anticoagulants, blood factors, bone morphogenetic proteins, engineered protein scaffolds, enzymes, growth factors, hormones, interferons, interleukins, and thrombolytics. They can also be classified based on their molecular mechanism of activity as (a) binding non-covalently to target, e.g., mAbs; (b) affecting covalent bonds, e.g., enzymes; and (c) exerting activity without specific interactions, e.g., serum albumin. Most protein therapeutics currently on the market are recombinant and hundreds of them are in clinical trials for therapy of cancers, immune disorders, infections, and other diseases. New engineered proteins, including bispecific mAbs and multispecific fusion proteins, mAbs conjugated with small molecule drugs, and proteins with optimized pharmacokinetics, are currently under development. However, in the last several decades, there are no conceptually new methodological developments comparable, e.g., to genetic engineering leading to the development of recombinant therapeutic proteins. It appears that a paradigm change in methodologies and understanding of mechanisms is needed to overcome major challenges, including resistance to therapy, access to targets, complexity of biological systems, and individual variations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carter PJ (2006) Potent antibody therapeutics by design. Nat Rev Immunol 6:343–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schrama D, Reisfeld RA, Becker JC (2006) Antibody targeted drugs as cancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:147–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Waldmann TA (2003) Immunotherapy: past, present and future. Nat Med 9:269–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Casadevall A, Dadachova E, Pirofski LA (2004) Passive antibody therapy for infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:695–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carter PJ (2011) Introduction to current and future protein therapeutics: a protein engineering perspective. Exp Cell Res 317:1261–1269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dimitrov DS (2010) Therapeutic antibodies, vaccines and antibodyomes. MAbs 2:347–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Walsh G (2010) Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2010. Nat Biotechnol 28:917–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leader B, Baca QJ, Golan DE (2008) Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7:21–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dimitrov DS, Marks JD (2009) Therapeutic antibodies: current state and future trends—is a paradigm change coming soon? Methods Mol Biol 525:1–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ashkenazi A (2008) Directing cancer cells to self-destruct with pro-apoptotic receptor agonists. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7:1001–1012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beck A, Reichert JM (2011) Therapeutic Fc-fusion proteins and peptides as successful alternatives to antibodies. MAbs 3(5):415–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reichert JM (2011) Antibody-based therapeutics to watch in 2011. MAbs 3:76–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reichert JM (2010) Metrics for antibody therapeutics development. MAbs 2:695–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohler G, Milstein C (1975) Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256:495–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goeddel DV, Kleid DG, Bolivar F, Heyneker HL, Yansura DG, Crea R, Hirose T, Kraszewski A, Itakura K, Riggs AD (1979) Expression in Escherichia coli of chemically synthesized genes for human insulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:106–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Feng Y, Dimitrov DS (2008) Monoclonal antibodies against components of the IGF system for cancer treatment. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 11:178–185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu H, Pfarr DS, Tang Y, An LL, Patel NK, Watkins JD, Huse WD, Kiener PA, Young JF (2005) Ultra-potent antibodies against respiratory syncytial virus: effects of binding kinetics and binding valence on viral neutralization. J Mol Biol 350:126–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Skerra A (2007) Alternative non-antibody scaffolds for molecular recognition. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:295–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen W, Dimitrov DS (2009) Human monoclonal antibodies and engineered antibody domains as HIV-1 entry inhibitors. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 4:112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen W, Zhu Z, Feng Y, Xiao X, Dimitrov DS (2008) Construction of a large phage-displayed human antibody domain library with a scaffold based on a newly identified highly soluble, stable heavy chain variable domain. J Mol Biol 382:779–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen W, Zhu Z, Feng Y, Dimitrov DS (2008) Human domain antibodies to conserved sterically restricted regions on gp120 as exceptionally potent cross-reactive HIV-1 neutralizers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:17121–17126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen W, Xiao X, Wang Y, Zhu Z, Dimitrov DS (2010) Bifunctional fusion proteins of the human engineered antibody domain m36 with human soluble CD4 are potent inhibitors of diverse HIV-1 isolates. Antiviral Res 88:107–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dimitrov DS (2009) Engineered CH2 domains (nanoantibodies). MAbs 1:26–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiao X, Feng Y, Vu BK, Ishima R, Dimitrov DS (2009) A large library based on a novel (CH2) scaffold: identification of HIV-1 inhibitors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 387:387–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gong R, Vu BK, Feng Y, Prieto DA, Dyba MA, Walsh JD, Prabakaran P, Veenstra TD, Tarasov SG, Ishima R, Dimitrov DS (2009) Engineered human antibody constant domains with increased stability. J Biol Chem 284:14203–14210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gong R, Wang Y, Feng Y, Zhao Q, Dimitrov DS (2011) Shortened engineered human antibody CH2 domains: increased stability and binding to the human neonatal receptor. J Biol Chem 286(3):27288–27293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang XR, Song A, Bergelson S, Arroll T, Parekh B, May K, Chung S, Strouse R, Mire-Sluis A, Schenerman M (2011) Advances in the assessment and control of the effector functions of therapeutic antibodies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:101–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Descotes J, Gouraud A (2008) Clinical immunotoxicity of therapeutic proteins. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 4:1537–1549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Suntharalingam G, Perry MR, Ward S, Brett SJ, Castello-Cortes A, Brunner MD, Panoskaltsis N (2006) Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. N Engl J Med 355:1018–1028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ewer SM, Ewer MS (2008) Cardiotoxicity profile of trastuzumab. Drug Saf 31:459–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chung CH (2008) Managing premedications and the risk for reactions to infusional monoclonal antibody therapy. Oncologist 13:725–732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Winter MC, Hancock BW (2009) Ten years of rituximab in NHL. Expert Opin Drug Saf 8:223–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pendley C, Schantz A, Wagner C (2003) Immunogenicity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Curr Opin Mol Ther 5:172–179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schellekens H (2008) How to predict and prevent the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. Biotechnol Annu Rev 14:191–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Onda M (2009) Reducing the immunogenicity of protein therapeutics. Curr Drug Targets 10:131–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Baker MP, Jones TD (2007) Identification and removal of immunogenicity in therapeutic proteins. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 10:219–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Stas P, Lasters I (2009) Strategies for preclinical immunogenicity assessment of protein therapeutics. IDrugs 12:169–173

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. De Groot AS, McMurry J, Moise L (2008) Prediction of immunogenicity: in silico paradigms, ex vivo and in vivo correlates. Curr Opin Pharmacol 8:620–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Emi AN, de Carvalho JF, Artur Almeida SC, Bonfa E (2010) Immunogenicity of Anti-TNF-alpha agents in autoimmune diseases. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 38(2–3):82–89

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hangartner L, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H (2006) Antiviral antibody responses: the two extremes of a wide spectrum. Nat Rev Immunol 6:231–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dixit R, Coats S (2009) Preclinical efficacy and safety models for mAbs: the challenge of developing effective model systems. IDrugs 12:103–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Castillo J, Winer E, Quesenberry P (2008) Newer monoclonal antibodies for hematological malignancies. Exp Hematol 36:755–768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mariani G, Fasolo A, De BE, Gianni L (2009) Trastuzumab as adjuvant systemic therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 6:93–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bedard PL, Piccart-Gebhart MJ (2008) Current paradigms for the use of HER2-targeted therapy in early-stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 8(Suppl 4):S157–S165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hall PS, Cameron DA (2009) Current perspective—trastuzumab. Eur J Cancer 45:12–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Cameron D, Casey M, Press M, Lindquist D, Pienkowski T, Romieu CG, Chan S, Jagiello-Gruszfeld A, Kaufman B, Crown J, Chan A, Campone M, Viens P, Davidson N, Gorbounova V, Raats JI, Skarlos D, Newstat B, Roychowdhury D, Paoletti P, Oliva C, Rubin S, Stein S, Geyer CE (2008) A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:533–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Norden AD, Drappatz J, Wen PY (2008) Novel anti-angiogenic therapies for malignant gliomas. Lancet Neurol 7:1152–1160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sachdev JC, Jahanzeb M (2008) Evolution of bevacizumab-based therapy in the management of breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 8:402–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Patel DK (2008) Clinical use of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer. Pharmacotherapy 28:31S–41S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tassev DV, Cheung NK (2009) Monoclonal antibody therapies for solid tumors. Expert Opin Biol Ther 9:341–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hopper-Borge EA, Nasto RE, Ratushny V, Weiner LM, Golemis EA, Astsaturov I (2009) Mechanisms of tumor resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies. Expert Opin Ther Targets 13:339–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Presta LG (2008) Molecular engineering and design of therapeutic antibodies. Curr Opin Immunol 20:460–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Jefferis R (2009) Glycosylation as a strategy to improve antibody-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 8:226–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Labrijn AF, Aalberse RC, Schuurman J (2008) When binding is enough: nonactivating antibody formats. Curr Opin Immunol 20:479–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kiewe P, Thiel E (2008) Ertumaxomab: a trifunctional antibody for breast cancer treatment. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 17:1553–1558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Weber J (2009) Ipilimumab: controversies in its development, utility and autoimmune adverse events. Cancer Immunol Immunother 58:823–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Yuan J, Gnjatic S, Li H, Powel S, Gallardo HF, Ritter E, Ku GY, Jungbluth AA, Segal NH, Rasalan TS, Manukian G, Xu Y, Roman RA, Terzulli SL, Heywood M, Pogoriler E, Ritter G, Old LJ, Allison JP, Wolchok JD (2008) CTLA-4 blockade enhances polyfunctional NY-ESO-1 specific T cell responses in metastatic melanoma patients with clinical benefit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:20410–20415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bellail AC, Qi L, Mulligan P, Chhabra V, Hao C (2009) TRAIL agonists on clinical trials for cancer therapy: the promises and the challenges. Rev Recent Clin Trials 4:34–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Feng Y, Xiao X, Zhu Z, Dimitrov DS (2010) Identification and characterization of a novel agonistic anti-DR4 human monoclonal antibody. MAbs 2:565–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang MY, Shu Y, Phogat S, Xiao X, Cham F, Bouma P, Choudhary A, Feng YR, Sanz I, Rybak S, Broder CC, Quinnan GV, Evans T, Dimitrov DS (2003) Broadly cross-reactive HIV neutralizing human monoclonal antibody Fab selected by sequential antigen panning of a phage display library. J Immunol Methods 283:17–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Choudhry V, Zhang MY, Sidorov IA, Louis JM, Harris I, Dimitrov AS, Bouma P, Cham F, Choudhary A, Rybak SM, Fouts T, Montefiori DC, Broder CC, Quinnan GV Jr, Dimitrov DS (2007) Cross-reactive HIV-1 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies selected by screening of an immune human phage library against an envelope glycoprotein (gp140) isolated from a patient (R2) with broadly HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies. Virology 363:79–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang MY, Dimitrov DS (2007) Novel approaches for identification of broadly cross-reactive HIV-1 neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies and improvement of their potency. Curr Pharm Des 13:203–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Liu H, Gaza-Bulseco G, Faldu D, Chumsae C, Sun J (2008) Heterogeneity of monoclonal antibodies. J Pharm Sci 97:2426–2447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Birch JR, Racher AJ (2006) Antibody production. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58:671–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhou JX, Tressel T, Yang X, Seewoester T (2008) Implementation of advanced technologies in commercial monoclonal antibody production. Biotechnol J 3:1185–1200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank members of the group Protein Interactions, especially W. Chen, X. Xiao, Z. Zhu, Y. Feng, E. Streaker, and J. Owens for discussions, experiments and help, and the Editor V. Voynov for helpful suggestions which improved this article. This study was supported by the NIH NCI CCR intramural program, the NIH intramural AIDS program (IATAP), and the NIAID intramural biodefense program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Protein Interactions Group, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA

    Dimiter S. Dimitrov

Authors
  1. Dimiter S. Dimitrov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimiter S. Dimitrov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. MedImmune, LLC, MedImmune Way One, Gaithersburg, 20878, USA

    Vladimir Voynov

  2. , Department of Physical Biochemistry, Biogen Idec, Cambridge Center 14, Cambridge, 02142, Massachusetts, USA

    Justin A. Caravella

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Dimitrov, D.S. (2012). Therapeutic Proteins. In: Voynov, V., Caravella, J. (eds) Therapeutic Proteins. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 899. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-921-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-921-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-920-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-921-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation