Regular Article
Correcting Measures of Relationship between Aggregate-Level Variables for Both Unreliability and Correlated Errors: An Empirical Example,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1998.0619Get rights and content

Abstract

Many social scientists conducting macro-level analyses use aggregate-level variables (weighted sums of the characteristics of the individuals within the macro-level units: e.g., means, percents, or rates) to describe macro-level units (e.g., schools, cities, or states). Researchers have long known that aggregate-level variables are likely to be more reliable than individual-level variables. More recently, they have recognized the possibility of estimating the reliability of aggregate-level variables using information on the variability of these variables and variability of the individual-level characteristics (on which they are based). These reliability estimates can be used to correct measures of association at the aggregate-level for unreliability. When correcting measures of relationship, however, researchers will often need to consider the correlated errors generated when the same set of individuals responds to the same questions used to create the aggregate-level variables (the problem of joint sampling). This paper shows how to estimate these correlated measurement errors and use them, and aggregate-level reliability coefficients, to correct measures of relationship at the aggregate-level. These techniques are applied to data from the Senate National Election Studies to illustrate the impact of these corrections.

References (24)

  • L.L. Hargens et al.

    A new approach to referees' assessments of manuscripts

    Social Science Research

    (1990)
  • R.M. O'Brien

    The reliability of composites of referee assessments in manuscripts

    Social Science Research

    (1991)
  • C.J. Coluton et al.

    Measuring neighborhood context for young children in an urban area

    American Journal of Community Psychology

    (1996)
  • L.J. Cronbach et al.

    The Dependability of Behavioral Measurement: Theory of Generalizability for Score Profiles

    (1972)
  • R.S. Erikson et al.

    Statehouse Democracy

    (1993)
  • K.F. Ferraro

    Validity, reliability, and hostility: A comment on Longshore

    Social Forces

    (1984)
  • R.V. Hogg et al.

    Introduction to Mathematical Statistics

    (1978)
  • B.S. Jones et al.

    The reliability of aggregated public opinion measures

    American Journal of Political Science

    (1996)
  • P.F. Lazarsfeld et al.

    On the relation between individual and collective properties

    A Sociological Reader on Complex Organizations

    (1969)
  • D.W. Levine

    True scores, error, reliability, and unit of analysis in environment and behavior research

    Environment and Behavior

    (1994)
  • D.W. Levine

    Why choose one level of analysis? And other issues in multilevel research

    Environment and Behavior

    (1996)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Multiculturalism in the classroom: Ethnic attitudes and classmates' beliefs

      2013, International Journal of Intercultural Relations
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, we aggregated the three original items at the classroom level, and computed α for the 38 classrooms, which was 0.91. Second, we calculated the reliability coefficient suggested by O’Brien (1998) which indicates the extent to which the mean scores for individual students can be regarded as parallel items of the aggregated measure. This reliability coefficient was r = 0.73.

    • Ethnic attitudes of minority students and their contact with majority group teachers

      2012, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cronbach's alpha was .81. We also calculated the reliability coefficient suggested by O'Brien (1998), which indicates the extent to which the mean scores for individual students can be regarded as parallel items of the aggregated measure. This reliability coefficient was satisfactory, r = .77.

    • Ethnic incongruence and the student-teacher relationship: The perspective of ethnic majority teachers

      2012, Journal of School Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, we aggregated the three original items at the classroom level, and computed Cronbach's α for the 36 classrooms, which was .82. Second, we calculated the reliability coefficient suggested by O'Brien (1998), which indicates the extent to which the mean scores for individual students can be regarded as parallel items of the aggregated measure. This reliability coefficient was sufficient, r = .76.

    • Affluence and influence: Economic inequality and political power in America

      2012, Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America
    • Affluence and influence: Economic inequality and political power in America

      2012, Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America

    Address reprint requests to Robert M. O'Brien, Department of Sociology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.

    ☆☆

    A. Etzioni

    View full text