Regular Article
Interplay between Local Dynamics and Dispersal in Discrete-time Metapopulation Models

https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.3075Get rights and content

Abstract

The effects of synchronous dispersal on discrete-time metapopulation dynamics with local (patch) dynamics of the same (compensatory or overcompensatory) or mixed (compensatory and overcompensatory) types are explored. Single-species metapopulation models behave as single-species single-patch models, whenever all local patches are governed by compensatory dynamics. Dispersal gives rise to multiple attractors with complex basin structures, whenever some local patches are under overcompensatory dynamics. In mixed systems, dispersal is capable of altering the local dynamics from compensatory to overcompensatory dynamics and vice versa. Examples are provided of metapopulation models supporting multiple attractors with intermingled basins of attraction.

References (56)

  • L.J. ALLEN

    Persistence, extinction, and critical patch number for island populations

    J. Math. Biol.

    (1987)
  • M. BEGON et al.

    Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. Populations and Communities

    (1996)
  • BEST, J. PASOUR, V. TISCH, N. CASTILLO-CHAVEZ, C. 2001, Delayed density dependence and the dynamic consequences of...
  • F. BRAUER et al.

    Mathematical models in population biology and epidemiology

  • C. CASTILLO-CHAVEZ et al.

    Intraspecific competition, dispersal and disease dynamics in discrete-time patchy environments

  • COHEN, D. LEVIN, S. A. 1987, The interaction between dispersal and dormancy strategies in varying and heterogeneous...
  • M. DOEBELI et al.

    Evolution of dispersal rates in metapopulation model: branching and cyclic dynamics in phenotype space

    Evolution

    (1997)
  • D.J. EARN et al.

    Coherence and conservation

    Science

    (2000)
  • P.L. ERRINGTON

    Some contributions of a fifteen year local study of the northern bobwhite to a knowledge of population phenomena

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (1945)
  • J.E. FRANKE et al.

    Mutual exclusion versus coexistence for discrete competitive systems

    J. Math. Biol.

    (1991)
  • M. GADGIL

    Dispersal: Population consequences and evolution

    Ecology

    (1971)
  • C. GREBOGI et al.

    Chaos, strange attractors, and fractal basin boundaries in nonlinear dynamics

    Science

    (1987)
  • HAIRSTON, N. G. Diapause dynamics of 2 Diaptomid copepod species in a large lake, Hydrobiologia, 293, 209,...
  • I. HANSKI et al.

    Multiple equilibria in metapopulation dynamics

    Nature

    (1995)
  • I. HANSKI

    Single-species metapopulation dynamics-concepts, models and observations

    Biol. J. Linn. Soc.

    (1997)
  • I.A. HANSKI et al.

    Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution

    (1997)
  • M.P. HASSELL

    The dynamics of competition and predation

  • Cited by (37)

    • Simple diffusion can support the pitchfork, the flip bifurcations, and the chaos

      2017, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Metapopulation is also an important concept in several ecological fields, including population ecology, landscape ecology, and conservation biology, which provide a theoretical framework for studying spatially structured populations. Recently, the authors in [28–33] had considered such problem. However, we find that their models are still complex when the diffusion terms vanish.

    • A quantitative approach to the stabilizing role of dispersal in metapopulations

      2017, Mathematical Biosciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Spatial structure is one source of new dynamical behaviours that particularly affect biological trends in managed environments [11–13,19,21] and has given rise to an important interest on the understanding of metapopulation models. Although the role of dispersal occupies a relevant place in the ecological research [2,6,22,23], many crucial issues remain to be solved. In this paper, we have analyzed one of the most popular and simple frameworks employed in metapopulation theory.

    • Dispersal effects on a discrete two-patch model for plant-insect interactions

      2011, Journal of Theoretical Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is a copious amount of literature on patch models (e.g., Maynard Smith and Slatkin, 1973; Allen, 1975; Holt, 1985; Reeve, 1988; Taylor, 1988; Adler, 1993; Gyllenberg et al., 1993; Hastings, 1993; Doebeli, 1997; Yakubu, 2000; Amarasekare, 2000; Yakubu and Castillo-Chavez, 2002; Holt et al. 2004; also see a review paper by Briggs and Hoopes, 2004; and references therein; Selgrade and Roberds, 2005; Kang and Lanchier, in press). Only a few are discrete two-species-interacting models in a patchy environment (e.g., Maynard Smith and Slatkin, 1973; Allen, 1975; Reeve, 1988; Taylor, 1988; Adler, 1993; Doebeli, 1997; Yakubu, 2000; Yakubu and Castillo-Chavez, 2002; Selgrade and Roberds, 2005). Maynard Smith and Slatkin (1973), as well as Allen (1975) and Reeve (1988) show that the unstable equilibrium of a single-patch predator–prey model cannot be stabilized by diffusive coupling with identical patches, since the coupled system behaves identically to the single-patch system if the patches are synchronized.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Corresponding author. Mathematical and Theoretical Biology Institute (MTBI), Department of Biometrics for Undergraduate Research, Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 432 Warren Hall, Ithaca NY 14853-7801, U.S.A.. Tel.: +1-607-255-81-03; fax: +1-607-255-4698. E-mail addresss: [email protected] [email protected] (A.-A. Yakubu).

    View full text