Regular Article
Punctuated Equilibria or Gradual Evolution: Fluctuating Asymmetry and Variation in the Rate of Evolution

https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1993.1061Get rights and content

Abstract

The debate on long-term rates of evolution is polarized around two models: the punctuated equilibrium hypothesis (long periods of very little evolution interrupted by periods of relatively rapid evolutionary change) and the gradual view (the rate of evolution is gradual, albeit with variable rate). Here we suggest that the pace of evolutionary change can be independently determined by estimating the degree of trait asymmetry. Fluctuating asymmetry occurs as a result of random deviations in the development of bilaterally symmetric traits. The degree of fluctuating asymmetry closely reflects the ability of individuals to cope with stress. Traits subject to strong directional selection become less developmentally canalized and more susceptible to the influence of stress. Strong stabilizing selection has the opposite effect. Characters of individuals from periods of rapid evolutionary change should hence be characterized by high variability, high fluctuating asymmetry and fluctuating asymmetry should increase with trait size in the direction of selection. In contrast, characters of individuals from periods of little evolutionary change should demonstrate low variability, low asymmetry and a flat or U-shaped relationship between size and asymmetry.

References (0)

Cited by (38)

  • Morphological homeostasis in the fossil record

    2019, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Genetic canalization, environmental canalization, and mechanisms of homeorhesis reduce the sensitivity of the phenotype to allelic variation, environmental variation, and stochastic developmental perturbations, respectively. In situations where phenotypic deviants are at a selective disadvantage within and/or across particular environments—i.e., when a population is subject to stabilizing selection—one or more of these processes might therefore be expected to evolve ([3,4,10,25,51,59,71–75,7,11,17,52,76–82]; although canalization or homeorhesis of a given trait under stabilizing selection can be limited by factors such as mutation-selection balance and fitness trade-offs between integrated traits, e.g., [4,22,83,84]). Conversely, in the face of changing or fluctuating environmental conditions, the capacity of a developmental system to produce phenotypic deviants might be a selective advantage.

  • Growth and developmental instability

    2003, Veterinary Journal
  • Developmental stability and signalling among cells

    1998, Journal of Theoretical Biology
  • Developmental Instability as a General Measure of Stress

    1998, Advances in the Study of Behavior
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text