Regular Article
The More Rational Side of Self-Serving Prototypes: The Effects of Success and Failure Performance Feedback,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1362Get rights and content

Abstract

People have a tendency to believe that the attributes they view as self-descriptive are more important for success than those they view as non-self-descriptive. That is, the prototypes that people possess of social concepts tend to be self-serving. We propose that this bias may arise because people rationally infer from their experiences of achievement that their personal skills and characteristics are related to success. In two studies, the correlation between participants' self-ratings on number of attributes related to a domain and their ratings of importance of those attributes to success within that domain was examined before and after performance feedback was provided. As expected, those who received success feedback came to perceive a stronger relationship between “what they had” and “what it takes to succeed” than did those who received failure feedback. Discussion focuses on the implications of these findings for the development and consequences of self-serving prototypes.

References (32)

  • D. Dunning et al.

    Egocentric definitions of traits and abilities in social judgment

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1992)
  • D. Dunning et al.

    Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1996)
  • D. Dunning et al.

    A new look at motivated inference: Are self-serving theories of success a product of motivational forces

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1995)
  • D. Dunning et al.

    Idiosyncratic trait prototypes and self-description: Implications for self and social judgment

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1995)
  • D. Dunning et al.

    Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic definitions in self-serving assessments of ability

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1989)
  • Cited by (19)

    • "I just don't know what I'm supposed to know": Evaluating self-assessment skills of international pharmacy graduates in Canada

      2008, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
      Citation Excerpt :

      to important but rare (do I have the competency necessary to administer first aid in this situation?).6,7 Impaired self-assessment is commonplace,8 and suggests that self-assessment is not a binary process (effective/ineffective), but instead is one which ranges from more effective to less effective.9,10 There is literature that suggests that many people have impaired self-assessment skills:11 for example, the so-called “above-average effect” is the tendency of most people to believe that they are above average despite the obvious violation of logic or statistics this necessarily entails.12

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors thank Michelle Silver, Amy Holzberg, and Erin Pettis for their assistance in this research and the anonymous reviewers, whose comments improved the quality of this manuscript. Preparation of this article was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant RO1 56072 to the second author.

    Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Amber L. Story, University of South Carolina Aiken, Department of Psychology, 471 University Parkway, Aiken, SC 29801. E-mail:[email protected].

    ☆☆

    J. Suls

    View full text