Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 63, Issue 6, June 2002, Pages 1079-1089
Animal Behaviour

Regular Articles
Path analysis and the relative importance of male–female conflict, female choice and male–male competition in water striders

https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.2002Get rights and content

Abstract

Three major behavioural mechanisms underlying sexual selection in many systems are male–male competition, female choice and male–female conflict. We used path analysis to evaluate the relative importance of these mechanisms in generating sexual selection on a suite of male traits in the stream-dwelling water strider, Aquarius remigis. To gather data for the analysis, we quantified the morphology (total length, limb length, forefemur width, genital length), behaviour (activity), mating frequency, mean mating duration and overall mating success of 96 adult males over a 10-day period. Males varied considerably in mating success. Over the 10 days, individual males mated 0–14 times, spending 0–67% of their time in copula. Path analysis showed that male–male competition was important in favouring larger males with longer limbs that tended to be more active. Active males should encounter females more frequently. In water striders, almost all male–female encounters result in intense premating struggles pitting female resistance to mating against male insistence. This male–female conflict favoured larger males with longer genitalia. These traits help males overcome female resistance. Female choice was expressed via female-controlled variation in mate-guarding durations. Female choice favoured smaller males perhaps because they are lighter, less expensive ‘shields’ against harassment by other males. Male size thus affected mating success via all three behavioural mechanisms. Weak, overall sexual selection favouring larger males was the product of conflicting effects: male–female conflict strongly favouring larger males and male–male competition weakly favouring larger males, offset by female choice favouring smaller males. Separate analyses for warmer versus colder days showed that on colder days (daily high below 20 °C), male–male competition was the main mechanism generating variation in mating frequency, while on warmer days, both male–male competition and male–female conflict were important. Copyright 2002 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

References (58)

  • M. Andersson

    Sexual Selection

    (1994)
  • S.J. Arnold

    Morphology, performance and fitness

    American Zoologist

    (1983)
  • S.J. Arnold et al.

    Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory

    American Naturalist

    (1994)
  • S.J. Arnold et al.

    On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory

    Evolution

    (1984)
  • G. Arnqvist

    Spatial variation in selective regimes: sexual selection in the water strider, Gerris odontogaster

    Evolution

    (1992)
  • G. Arnqvist

    The evolution of water strider mating systems: causes and consequences of sexual conflicts

  • G. Arnqvist et al.

    Postmating sexual selection: the effects of male body size and recovery period on paternity and egg production in a water strider

    Behavioral Ecology

    (1999)
  • W.U. Blanckenhorn

    Fitness consequences of alternative life histories in water striders, Aquarius remigis (Heteroptera: Gerridae)

    Oecologia

    (1994)
  • J.C. Choe et al.

    Social Competition and Cooperation in Insects and Arachnids. Vol. I. Evolution of Mating Systems

    (1995)
  • S.J. Clark

    The effects of operational sex ratio and food deprivation on copulation duration in the waterstrider (Gerris remigis Say)

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

    (1988)
  • I. Danielsson

    Antagonistic pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection on male body size in a water strider (Gerris lacustris)

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B

    (2001)
  • W.G. Eberhard

    Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice

    (1996)
  • D.J. Fairbairn

    Sexual selection for homogamy in the Gerridae: an extension of Ridley's comparative approach

    Evolution

    (1988)
  • D.J. Fairbairn

    Costs of loading associated with mate-carrying in the waterstrider, Aquarius remigis

    Behavioral Ecology

    (1993)
  • D.J. Fairbairn et al.

    Sexual selection and the evolution of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis

    American Naturalist

    (1994)
  • K.E. Haskins et al.

    Predation risk and social interference as factors influencing habitat selection in two species of stream-dwelling waterstriders

    Behavioral Ecology

    (1997)
  • A.E. Houde

    Sex, Color and Mate Choice in Guppies

    (1997)
  • R.A. Knapp et al.

    Egg-mimicry as a male mating strategy in the fantail darter, Etheostoma flabellare: females prefer males with eggs

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

    (1989)
  • J.J. Krupa et al.

    Experimental studies on water strider mating dynamics: spatial variation in density and sex ratio

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

    (1993)
  • Cited by (78)

    • Mating behaviour and behavioural ecology of a Predatory Wasp, Symmorphus allobrogus (de Saussure) (Hymenoptera: Eumeninae)

      2021, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, we may expect some sort of female’s choice at this phase: it is possible that the female uses the rejection response as an exercise of mate’s assessment . Mating systems of some insects such as flies and water striders involve a premating vigorous struggle that results in the rejection of undesirable males as well (Sih et al., 2002). The most important activities of the male, stimulating the female to copulate, were antennation involving the stroking of female’s antennae by the tyloidea and stroking by abdomen and the approach.

    • Effects of behavioural type, social skill and the social environment on male mating success in water striders

      2014, Animal Behaviour
      Citation Excerpt :

      The likely underlying behavioural mechanism is that more active–aggressive males (again, as long as they were not hyperaggressive) spent more time searching for females in habitats where mating usually occurs. This result is not surprising (see also Sih et al., 2002); nevertheless, because surprisingly few other studies have measured consistent behavioural types for individual males and quantified effects of variation in behavioural type on mating success (Schuett et al., 2010), it is comforting to find corroboration of our intuition. With regard to aggressiveness, a general view is that more aggressive males might mate more because females prefer males that win fights, or because aggressive males win better territories that females prefer (i.e. because aggressive males win out in interference competition).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    f1

    Correspondence and present address: A. Sih, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. (email: [email protected]).

    f2

    M. Lauer is now at the Biology Department, Viterbo University, 815 South 9th Street, La Crosse, WI 54601, U.S.A.

    f3

    J. J. Krupa is at the T. H. Morgan School of Biological Sciences, Center for Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, U.S.A.

    View full text