Regular ArticleTense and Agreement in Agrammatic Production: Pruning the Syntactic Tree☆,☆☆
References (53)
Working memory
(1986)Human memory
(1990)- et al.
Grammatical morphology in aphasia: evidence from three languages
Cortex
(1987) - et al.
Relating events in narrative
(1994) - H. Borer, 1986, On the morphological parallelism between compounds and...
- et al.
A redefinition of the syndrome of Broca's aphasia: Implications of a neuropsychological model of language
Applied Psycholinguistics
(1980) Syntactic and semantic structures in agrammatism
Agrammatism
(1985)- et al.
The disruption of sentence production: some dissociations
Brain and Language
(1989) - et al.
Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia
Brain and Language
(1976) Syntactic structures
(1957)
A minimalist program for linguistic theory
MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics
German word formation and aphasia
The linguistic review
Morphological processing in Italian agrammatic speakers: Syntactic implementation of inflectional morphology
Brain and Language
Agrammatism
Agrammatism and inflectional morphology in English
Journal of speech and hearing research
Comparison of morphology and syntax in free narrative and structured tests: fluent vs. nonfluent aphasics
Cortex
Language disorders (aphasia)
The syntactic characterization of agrammatism
Cognition
Language deficits and the theory of syntax
Brain & Language
Theoretical perspectives on language deficits
There is an entity called agrammatic aphasia
Brain & Language
A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension
Brain and Language
Cited by (309)
Agrammatism in a usage-based theory of grammatical status: Impaired combinatorics, compensatory prioritization, or both?
2023, Journal of NeurolinguisticsCitation Excerpt :Many of the most influential theories of agrammatism are representational in the sense that they assume that the central deficit pertains to syntactic representation. This is the case, for instance, with Grodzinsky's Trace Deletion Hypothesis (e.g., Drai & Grodzinsky, 2006), Hickok and Avrutin's Differential Chain Deficit Hypothesis (e.g., Hickok & Avrutin, 1996), Mauner, Fromkin and Cornell's (1993) Double Dependency Hypothesis, and Friedmann and Grodzinsky's (1997) Tree Pruning Hypothesis. In contrast, neither of our two hypotheses assumes a representation deficit.
Treatment of verb tense morphology in agrammatic aphasia: A systematic review
2022, Journal of NeurolinguisticsCitation Excerpt :In this part, we will discuss these theories to see which one is more applicable to the results of reviewed studies. The TPH theory (Friedmann & Grodzinsky, 1997) limits the tense deficit to output modality and predicts the non-equal impairment of verb inflection production and the higher vulnerability of higher-level nodes on the syntactic tree (e.g. complementizer) compared to the impairment of the lower nodes (e.g. tense, agreement). Further, based on Pollock’s (1989) theory of split inflection phrase (IP), TPH proposes that the tense node is higher and more vulnerable than the agreement.
The comprehension of relative clauses in Mandarin Children with suspected specific language impairment
2023, Journal of Child LanguageAutomated Measures of Syntactic Complexity in Natural Speech Production: Older and Younger Adults as a Case Study
2024, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchThe language network as a natural kind within the broader landscape of the human brain
2024, Nature Reviews NeuroscienceTreatment of verb tense inflection and sentence production in Persian individuals with agrammatism
2024, Applied Neuropsychology:Adult
- ☆
We thank Jennifer Balogh, Roelien Bastiaanse, Uri Hadar, Maria Mercedes Piñango, Esterella de Roo, and Edgar Zurif for their insightful comments on this paper. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Na'ama Friedmann, Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. E-mail:[email protected].
- ☆☆
M.-L. Kean