Panagiotis Georgakis
ABSTRACT
Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is a new approach for multimodal transportation in smart cities which refers to the seamless integration of various forms of transport services accessible through one single digital platform. In a MaaS environment there can be a multitude of multi modal options to reach a destination which are derived from combinations of available transport services. Therefore, route planning functionalities in the MaaS era need to be able to generate multi-modal routes using constraints related to a user's modal allowances, service provision and limited user preferences (e.g. mode exclusions) and suggest to the traveller the routes that are relevant for specific trips as well as aligned to her/his preferences. In this paper, we describe an architecture for a MaaS multi-modal route planner which integrates i) a dynamic journey planner that aggregates unimodal routes from existing route planners (e.g. Google directions or Here routing), enriches them with innovative mobility services typically found in MaaS schemes, and converts them to multimodal options, while considering aspects of transport network supply and ii) a route recommender that filters and ranks the available routes in an optimal manner, while trying to satisfy travellers’ preferences as well as requirements set by the MaaS operator (e.g. environmental friendliness of the routes or promotion of specific modes of transport).
- Jönson G., & Tengström E. (2006). Urban Transport Development: A Complex Issue. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
- Durand, A., Harms, L., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., & Zijlstra, T. (2018). Mobility-as-a-Service and changes in travel preferences and travel behaviour: a literature review. KiM Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
- Kamargianni, M., & Matyas, M. (2017). The business ecosystem of mobility-as-a-service. In transportation research board (Vol. 96). Transportation Research Board.Google Scholar
- Ştefănescu, P., Mocan, M., Ştefănescu, W., & Neculai, P. V. (2014). Trip Planners Used in Public Transportation. Case Study on the City of Timişoara. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 142-148.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rahaman, M. S., Mei, Y., Hamilton, M., & Salim, F. D. (2017). CAPRA: A contour-based accessible path routing algorithm. Information Sciences, 385, 157-173.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu, H., & Lu, F. (2012). A multi-modal route planning approach with an improved genetic algorithm. Advances in Geo-Spatial Information Science, 193.Google Scholar
- Liu, L. (2011). Data model and algorithms for multimodal route planning with transportation networks (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität München).Google Scholar
- Clauss, T., & Döppe, S. (2016). Why do urban travelers select multimodal travel options: A repertory grid analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 93, 93-116.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kramers, A., Höjer, M., Lövehagen, N., & Wangel, J. (2014). Smart sustainable cities–Exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities. Environmental modelling & software, 56, 52-62.Google Scholar
- Hrncir, J., & Jakob, M. (2013). (2013). Generalised time-dependent Graphs for fully multimodal journey planning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 16th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013), The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Prandtstetter, M., Straub, M., & Puchinger, J. (2013). On the way to a multi-modal energy-efficient route. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2013, Vienna.Google Scholar
- Bast, H., Delling, D., Goldberg, A., Müller-Hannemann, M., Pajor, T., Sanders, P., Wagner, D., Werneck, R. F. (2016). Route planning in transportation networks. Algorithm Engineering, Springer, 19-80.Google Scholar
- Gillies, S., Butler, H., Daly, M., Doyle, A., & Schaub, T. (2016). The GeoJSON Format. coordinates, 102, 0-5.Google Scholar
- Lamsfus, C., Wang, D., Alzua-Sorzabal, A., & Xiang, Z. (2015). Going mobile defining context for on-the-go travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 54(6), 691-701.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Newson, P., Krumm, J. (2009), Hidden Markov Map Matching Through Noise and Sparseness, 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2009), November 4-6, Seattle, WA | November 2009Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gretzel, U., Hwang, Y. H., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2012). Informing destination recommender systems design and evaluation through quantitative research. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 6(4), 297-315.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benediktsson J.A. and I. Kanellopoulos. Classification of multisource and hyperspectral data based on decision. IEEE Transactions On Geoscience And Remote Sensing, 1999.Conference Name:ACM Woodstock conference.Google Scholar
Recommendations
User-Constrained Multimodal Route Planning
In the multimodal route planning problem, we are given multiple transportation networks (e.g., pedestrian, road, public transit) and ask for a best integrated journey between two points. The main challenge is that a seemingly optimal journey may have ...
Multi‐AGV route planning in automated warehouse system based on shortest‐time Q‐learning algorithm
AbstractRoute planning for automated guided vehicles (AGVs) is one of the key factors that affects work efficiency of automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RSes). Route planning plays an important role in the operation of AGVs. Since the ...
Online Route Replanning for Scalable System-Optimal Route Planning
SIGSPATIAL '21: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information SystemsRoute planning in transportation networks is typically performed as a single optimization at trip departure. In this paper, we consider the impact of within-trip replanning on the performance of the overall network in a fully-algorithmic route selection ...
Comments