Abstract
In spite of the gradual development of three-dimensional analysis packages utilizing finite element models or finite difference algorithms for stress–strain calculations, two-dimensional (2D) analysis is still used as the primary engineering tool for practical analysis of tunnel behavior and tunnel support performance for design—particularly at the preliminary stage of a project. The applicability of 2D finite element analysis or analytical convergence confinement solutions to staged support installation depend on the application of an assumed or validated longitudinal displacement profile. Convergence in commonly applied 2D staged models is controlled by boundary displacement or internal pressure relaxation. While there have been developments to improve this methodology, this often assumes independence between the ground reaction curve and the support resistance, independence between the longitudinal displacement profile to support application, and the assumption that non-isotropic stresses and non-circular geometries can be handled in the same way as circular tunnels in isotropic conditions. This paper examines the validity of these assumptions and the error inherent in these extensions to 2D tunnel analysis. Anisotropic stresses and lagged (staged) excavation present a particular problem. Practical solutions are proposed for support longitudinal displacement LDPs in simplified conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernaud D, Rousset G (1996) The ‘New Implicit Method’ for tunnel analysis. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 20(9):673–690. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199609)20:9<673::AID-NAG845>3.0.CO;2-9
Brady BHG, Brown ET (1993) Rock mechanics for underground mining. Chapman and Hall 1993:571
Cai M (2008) Influence of stress path on tunnel excavation response—numerical tool selection and modeling strategy. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 23(2008):618–628
Cantieni L, Anagnostou G (2009) The effect of the stress path on squeezing behaviour in tunnelling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42(2):289–318
Carranza-Torres C, Fairhurst C (2000) Application of the convergence–confinement method of tunnel design to rock masses that satisfy the Hoek-Brown failure criterion. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 15(2):187–213
Chen WF (1982) Plasticity in Reinforced Concrete. McGraw Hill, New York, p 465p
Corbetta F, Bernaud D, Nguyen-Minh D (1991) Contribution a‘la method convergerce–confinement par le principe de la similitude. Rev Fr Geotech 54:5–11
Duncan Fama ME (1993) Numerical modelling of yield zones in weak rocks. In: Hudson JA (ed) Comprehensive rock engineering, vol 2. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 49–75
Eberhardt E (2001) Numerical modeling of three-dimensional stress rotation ahead of an advancing tunnel face. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(4):499–518
Hoek E, Diederichs MS (2006) Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(2):203–215
Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B. (2002) Hoek-Brown criterion-2002 edition. In: Proceedings of NARMS-TAC conference, Toronto, vol 1, pp 267–273
Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C. Diederichs, M.S. and Corkum B. (2008). Kersten lecture: Integration of geotechnical and structural design in tunnelling. In: Proceedings university of Minnesota 56th annual geotechnical engineering conference. Minneapolis, 29 Feb 2008, pp 1–53
Itasca (2002) FLAC3D Numercial Software Package. Itasca Consulting Group Inc, Lagrangian Analysis of Contiuna
Itasca (2005) FLAC3D Numercial Software Package. Itasca Consulting Group Inc, Lagrangian Analysis of Contiuna
Karakus M (2006) Appraising the methods accounting for 3D tunneling effects in 2D plain strain FE analysis. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 22:47–56
Nguyen-Minh D, Guo C (1996) Recent progress in convergence confinement method. In: Barla G (ed) Prediction and performance in rock mechanics and rock engineering: EUROCK’96, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 855–860
Owen DRJ, Hinton E (1980) Finite Elements in Plasticity. Pineridge Press, Swansea, p 589
Panet M (1993) Understanding deformations in tunnels. In: Hudson JA, Brown ET, Fairhurst C, Hoek E (eds) Comprehensive rock engineering, vol 1. Pergamon, London, pp 663–690
Panet M (1995) Le calcul des tunnels par la me′thode convergence–confinement. Presses de l’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chausse′es, Paris ISBN 2-85978-230-3. 187 p
Rocscience Inc. (2004) Phase2, 5. Rocscience Inc., Toronto, www.rocscience.com
Unlu T, Gercek H (2003) Effect of Poisson’s ratio on the normalized radial displacements occurring around the face of a circular tunnel. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 18:547–553
Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS (2009) Improved longitudinal displacement profiles for convergence confinement analysis of deep tunnels. Journal of rock mechanics and rock engineering, vol 42, Number 2, April 2009. pp 131–146
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vlachopoulos, N., Diederichs, M.S. Appropriate Uses and Practical Limitations of 2D Numerical Analysis of Tunnels and Tunnel Support Response. Geotech Geol Eng 32, 469–488 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9727-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9727-x